Madhya Pradesh Court July 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Narmada Prasad Sharma Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-31-2012
W.A.No.593/2010 31.7.2012 Shri R.K.Samaiya, with Shri Shailendra Samaiya, counsel for appellant. Shri Jaideep Singh, Dy.G.A., for respondent nos.1 to 3. Shri Pranay Verma, counsel for respondent nos.4 & 5. Learned counsel for respondent nos.4 & 5 submits that before filing of this appeal all the appellants have received the compensation without any protest, so this appeal has rendered infructuous. On raising such contention, Shri Samaiya, learned counsel for appellant submits that though the appellants have received the compensation, but they are entitled for the benefit under the rehabilitation scheme of the State Government of 2002 & 2007. On raising such contention, learned counsel for respondent no.4 & 5 submits that so far as the benefit of the aforesaid scheme is concerned appellant may get the benefit of the scheme which ever policy is applicable in the case of appellants by making an appropriate application before the Collector, Singroli for extending the benefit of the policy,...
Ganesh Education Society College Bhoj Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-31-2012
1 W.P. No. 1047/2010 31.7.2012 Counsel for the parties present. For the reasons stated in the order passed today separately in W.P. No. 14932/2010 Jawaharlal Nehru College v. Barkatullah University and others this petition is also disposed of with the following directions: (i) That, the State Government in coordination with Western Regional Committee and respective examining bodies, i.e., Universities, shall take a decision within a period of one month in respect of admissions made for the academic session 200809 as to whether the same was in consonance with the Regulations framed by the NCTE and the statutory policy framed by the State Government, if any, and whether the students have been imparted the teaching in accordance with the norms laid down by the NCTE. (ii) That, after ascertaining the above, and after having satisfied that the students in respective colleges ...
Vibha Patel Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-31-2012
1 Criminal Revision No.1077/12 31.07.2012. Shri A.K.Jain, Advocate for petitioner. Shri Sameer Chile, Govt.Advocate for State/respondent no.1. Shri Vivek Dixit, Advocate for respondent no.2. Heard finally at the motion stage with the consent of counsel for parties. This petition has been filed under Section 397 read with Section 401 of Cr.P.C.to quash the Order dated 29.5.12 passed by Judl.Magistrate Ist Class, ItaRs.in Criminal Case No.578/11 by which an amount of Rs.6,00,000/- deposited in the name of respondent no.2 was ordered not to be given to any of the parties. In short, the allegation in the revision is that respondent no.2 being servant stole three cheques, out of which one cheque of Rs.6,00,000/- was deposited at Allahabad Bank,ItaRs.in Saving Accounts No.50054409575 by him in his name. On the report of husband of petitioner, police registered a case under 2 Section 381 of IPC against respondent no.2 and Criminal Case No.578/11 is going on before JMFC, Itarsi. Payment was wi...
Narendra Kumar Ahirwar Vs. Union of India
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-31-2012
1 W.P. No. 13897/2009 31.7.2012 Shri Sanjay Sanyal, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri Vikram Singh, learned counsel for respondents. Heard. Assail is to an order dated 10.11.2009 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Jabalpur Bench, Jabalpur; whereby, the petitioner's Original Application seeking direction to the respondent to appoint him on compassionate ground in lieu of the death of his father has been dismissed. Petitioner's father, Chargeman Grade I, died in harness on 7.2.2004. He left behind his wife, one son and one unmarried daughter. Petitioner filed an application seeking compassionate appointment. Record reveals that he was thrice considered but more eligible candidates were appointed. In the year 2004, 2005 and 2006, petitioner, under the policy, secured 48 marks; whereas, the persons who were found eligible had secured 63 points and 55 points. The petitioner was, therefore, ...
Gyanodaya Mahavidyalaya Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-31-2012
1 W.P. No. 17583/2010 31.7.2012 Counsel for the parties present. For the reasons stated in the order passed today separately in W.P. No. 14932/2010 Jawaharlal Nehru College v. Barkatullah University and others this petition is also disposed of with the following directions: (i) That, the State Government in coordination with Western Regional Committee and respective examining bodies, i.e., Universities, shall take a decision within a period of one month in respect of admissions made for the academic session 200809 as to whether the same was in consonance with the Regulations framed by the NCTE and the statutory policy framed by the State Government, if any, and whether the students have been imparted the teaching in accordance with the norms laid down by the NCTE. (ii) That, after ascertaining the above, and after having satisfied that the students in respective colleges ...
Vidyasagar College Vs. Devi Ahilya University
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-31-2012
1 W.P. No. 17086/2010 31.7.2012 Counsel for the parties present. For the reasons stated in the order passed today separately in W.P. No. 14932/2010 Jawaharlal Nehru College v. Barkatullah University and others this petition is also disposed of with the following directions: (i) That, the State Government in coordination with Western Regional Committee and respective examining bodies, i.e., Universities, shall take a decision within a period of one month in respect of admissions made for the academic session 200809 as to whether the same was in consonance with the Regulations framed by the NCTE and the statutory policy framed by the State Government, if any, and whether the students have been imparted the teaching in accordance with the norms laid down by the NCTE. (ii) That, after ascertaining the above, and after having satisfied that the students in respective colleges ...
Chitransh A.D.P.G. College Vs. Secretary the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-31-2012
1 W.P. No. 18355/2010 31.7.2012 Counsel for the parties present. For the reasons stated in the order passed today separately in W.P. No. 14932/2010 Jawaharlal Nehru College v. Barkatullah University and others this petition is also disposed of with the following directions: (i) That, the State Government in coordination with Western Regional Committee and respective examining bodies, i.e., Universities, shall take a decision within a period of one month in respect of admissions made for the academic session 200809 as to whether the same was in consonance with the Regulations framed by the NCTE and the statutory policy framed by the State Government, if any, and whether the students have been imparted the teaching in accordance with the norms laid down by the NCTE. (ii) That, after ascertaining the above, and after having satisfied that the students in respective colleges ...
Rajeev Gandhi College Obedullaganj, M.P. Vs. the State of Madhya Prade ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-31-2012
1 W.P. No. 4562/2012 31.7.2012 Counsel for the parties present. For the reasons stated in the order passed today separately in W.P. No. 14932/2010 Jawaharlal Nehru College v. Barkatullah University and others this petition is also disposed of with the following directions: (i) That, the State Government in coordination with Western Regional Committee and respective examining bodies, i.e., Universities, shall take a decision within a period of one month in respect of admissions made for the academic session 200809 as to whether the same was in consonance with the Regulations framed by the NCTE and the statutory policy framed by the State Government, if any, and whether the students have been imparted the teaching in accordance with the norms laid down by the NCTE. (ii) That, after ascertaining the above, and after having satisfied that the students in respective colleges ...
Rajeev Gandhi College Bhopal Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-31-2012
1 W.P. No. 4552/2012 31.7.2012 Counsel for the parties present. For the reasons stated in the order passed today separately in W.P. No. 14932/2010 Jawaharlal Nehru College v. Barkatullah University and others this petition is also disposed of with the following directions: (i) That, the State Government in coordination with Western Regional Committee and respective examining bodies, i.e., Universities, shall take a decision within a period of one month in respect of admissions made for the academic session 200809 as to whether the same was in consonance with the Regulations framed by the NCTE and the statutory policy framed by the State Government, if any, and whether the students have been imparted the teaching in accordance with the norms laid down by the NCTE. (ii) That, after ascertaining the above, and after having satisfied that the students in respective colleges ...
Pramod Shrivas Vs. the State of M.P. and ors.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-31-2012
HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH : AT JABALPUR Writ Petition No :498. of 2005 Pramod Shrivas - V/s - State of MP and others Present : Honble Shri Justice Rajendra Menon. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Shri M.S.Bhatti and Shri Y.M.Tiwari, counsel for the petitioner. Ms.D.K.Bohrey, Panel Lawyer, for the respondents. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Whether approved for reporting: Yes / No.ORDER 31/07/2012 Challenging the order-dated 13.4.2000 passed by the disciplinary authority imposing the punishment of dismissal from service, which is not a disqualification for future employment; the order- dated 25.7.2000, passed by the Inspector General of Police, rejecting the appeal of the petitioner; and, the order-dated 5.11.2001, rejecting the mercy appeal of the petitioner, this writ petition has been filed. 2- Petitioner was enrolled in the Police Department as a Constable. While so worki...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »