Madhya Pradesh Court July 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Jayram Chouhan Vs. Union of India
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-20-2012
Writ Petition No.3906/2012 (S) 20.7.2012 Counsel for the parties present. This petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution, is directed against the order dated 15.2.2012 passed by the Armed Forces Tribunal, Regional Bench, Lucknow, whereby it has dismissed the petitioners Original Application No.246/2010. As the petitioner has a remedy of filing an appeal before the Supreme Court under section 30 of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007, we find no good reason to admit the present petition. The petition is accordingly dismissed on the ground of efficacious remedy of appeal available to the petitioner. The certified copy of the impugned order be returned to the petitioner subject to his filing photo copy of the same. Certified copy as per rules. (AJIT SINGH) (SANJAY YADAV) JUDGE JUDGE ps...
Bhajan Lal Latoriya Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-20-2012
1 W.P.No.9350/2012 Bhjan Lal Latoriya versus State of M.P.& ORS.20.07.2012 Heard Shri Sheshank Upadhyay learned counsel for the petitioner on the question of admission and interim relief. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that though elections are over and, therefore, nothing survives for adjudication in the petition, however the respondents be directed to comply with the direction issued by the Dy. Registrar, Co.operative Societies, Tikamgarh dated 4.5.2012, Annexure P-5. In the circumstances, while the petition filed by the petitioner is disposed of in view of the statement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, it is observed that the petitioner may approach the respondent Society for compliance of the direction issued by the Dy. Registrar, Co.operative Societies, Annexure P-5, and to take up further proceedings in that regard, if aggrieved. With the aforesaid observation, as prayed, the petition filed by the petitioner stands disposed of. C.C as per rules. ( R...
Devi Prasad Sharma Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-20-2012
W.P.No.9701/12 (D.P.Sharma versus State of MP and another) 20.07.2012 Heard Shri Pushpendra Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner on the question of admission. The petitioner has filed this petition praying for a direction to the respondents/authorities to consider and decide the petitioner's application claiming freedom fighter pension under M.P.Swatantrata Sangram Sainik Samman Nidhi Niyam, 1972 which is pending before them since 1982. Shri S.S.Bisen, learned Government Advocate appearing for the State on advance copy submits that in case the application of the petitioner is still pending and has not already been processed or decided by the authority, the respondents/authorities shall look into the same and decide it expeditiously, in accordance with law. In view of the aforesaid, the petition filed by the petitioner is disposed of with a direction to the respondents/ authorities to the effect that in case the petitioner furnishes a copy of the order passed today along with a cop...
Amlesh Kumar Upadhyay Vs. Union of India
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-20-2012
Writ Petition No.4553/2011 (S) 20.7.2012 Counsel for the parties present. This petition, under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution, is directed against the order dated 10.1.2011 passed by the Armed Forces Tribunal, Regional Bench, Lucknow, whereby it has dismissed the petitioners Transferred Application No.300/2010. As the petitioner has a remedy of filing an appeal before the Supreme Court under section 30 of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007, we find no good reason to admit the present petition. The petition is accordingly dismissed on the ground of efficacious remedy of appeal available to the petitioner. The certified copy of the impugned order be returned to the petitioner subject to his filing photo copy of the same. Certified copy as per rules. (AJIT SINGH) (SANJAY YADAV) JUDGE JUDGE ps...
Vijay Kumar Dehariya Vs. Secretary the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-20-2012
1 W.P.No.3893/2009 W.P.No.3893/2009 20/07/2012 Shri Manas Verma, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri Sanjeev Kumar Singh, learned PL for the respondents/State. Challenging the order Annexure-P1 dated 27.2.2009 passed by the respondents terminating the appointment of the petitioner, this writ petition has been filed. Appointment of the petitioner is cancelled on the ground that he has committed a misconduct of bigamy. Records indicate that the petitioner was appointed and was working on the post of Shiksha Karmi Grade-III after his due appointment in accordance with requirement of law. While so working, a complaint was lodged by one Smt. Leena Dehariya in Police Station Amarwara on 25.3.2008 to the effect that she is the legally married wife of the present petitioner and since her marriage i.e.from the year 2002, petitioner is harassing her, demanding dowry and assaulting her physically and it is also alleged that he has committed an offence of bigamy by marrying one Rajkumari daug...
Gulam Rasool Rayeen Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-20-2012
W.P.No.9724/2012 (Gulam Rasool Rayeen versus State of M.P.& Ors.) 20.07.2012 Heard Shri S.D.Khan, learned counsel for the petitioner on the question of admission and interim relief. The petitioner has filed this petition being aggrieved by order dated 04.06.2012 (Annexure P-8) whereby the Managing Committee of the Waqf Jama Masjid Sadar Bazar, Sagar, District Sagar has been appointed for a period of one year. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that he is the erstwhile Mutawalli of the said Waqf, however, as he was removed on account of his conviction in a criminal case, he had approached the Tribunal and thereafter this court by filing Civil Revision No.218/2010, which was disposed of with a direction to the respondent Waqf Board to reconstitute the committee after giving opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and other members and also taking into consideration the fact whether the petitioner can be included in the committee inspite of his conviction, after ex...
Bhagwat Yadav Vs. the State of M.P.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-20-2012
1 Criminal Appeal No.673/1997 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH JABALPUR Criminal Appeal No.673/1997 Bhagwat Yadava Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Present : Hon'ble Shri Justice N.K. Gupta. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name of counsel for the parties: Shri Raj Kamal Chaturvedi, counsel for the appellant. Shri S.K. Kashyap, Public Prosecutor the respondent/State. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- JUDGMENT (Passed on 20th day of July, 2012) The appellant has preferred this appeal against the judgment dated 28.1.1997 passed by the 4 th Additional Sessions Judge, Chhatarpur in S.T. No.19/1993, whereby the appellant was convicted for the offence punishable under Section 326 of IPC and sentenced for three years R.I. with fine of `500/- failing in depositing ...
Lavlesh Kumar Patel Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-20-2012
1 W.P.No.10427/2012 Lavlesh Kumar Patel versus State of M.P.& ORS.20.07.2012 Shri Ajay K. Shukla learned counsel for the petitioner. The learned counsel for the petitioner, after arguing at length, prays that he be granted liberty to file a representation before the respondent authorities against the impugned order dated 4.7.2012 and they be directed to consider the same. In view of the aforesaid, the petitioner filed by the petitioner is disposed of with the aforesaid. It goes without saying that in case the petitioner files a representation against the impugned order dated 4.7.2012, the authority concerned shall consider and decide the same expeditiously in accordance with law before proceeding any further in the matter. With the aforesaid observation/liberty, the petition filed by the petitioner stands disposed of. C.C as per rules. ( R.S.JHA ) JUDGE mms/-...
Reliable Construction Company Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-20-2012
1 A.C.No.22/2012 A.C.No.22/2012 20/07/2012 Shri R.N.Singh, learned Sr.Advocate with Shri Arpan Pawar, learned counsel for the applicant. Shri Rajesh Tiwari, learned GA for the respondents/State. Seeking constitution of an arbitral tribunal for adjudication of the dispute between the parties, this application has been filed under Section 11 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act 1996. Applicant herein is a registered partnership firm and is a contractor carrying out various civil engineering works for the Central Government and other government departments. The application on behalf of the firm is filed by one of the partneRs.Shri Madan Lal Bhatia, as is evident from Annexure-A1 and A2. It is the case of the applicant that an agreement Annexure- A3 was executed between the parties for the purpose of construction of a bypass road in the district at Jabalpur as detailed in Para-2 of the application. It is stated that the applicant has discharged his contractual obligation as per the agreem...
Shyamlal Dhurvey Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-20-2012
1 W.P.No.9432/2012 20/7/2012: Shri Shakti Soni, learned counsel for the petitioneRs.Shri B.P.Pandey, learned Dy.Govt.Adv., on advance notice for respondents/State. Petitioners are challenging an action of the respondents in denying the benefit of second kramonnati and proposing to make recovery of benefit already granted, the question involved in this petition already decided by a Bench of this Court in the case of Smt. Prerna W/o. Shri Promod Koranne versus State of M.P.and OtheRs.in W.P.No.6773/06, decided on 26/04/2007, and subsequently followed by this Court in series of cases, one such order being W.P.No.5756/08(s).Shri R.C.Chaurasiya & Others versus State of M.P.& OtheRs.decided on 26/05/2008. In the case of Smt. Prerna (Supra) the directions given is as under: 17. Consequently these petitions are allowed. The petitioners are entitled to derive the benefit of second Krammonati according to the terms and conditions mentioned in the circular dated 21/03/1983, 19/04/1999, 02/11/2001...
- ‹ Prev
- 44
- 45
- 46
- 47
- 48
- 50
- 51
- 52
- 53
- 54
- Next ›
- Last »