Madhya Pradesh Court July 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Pradeep Hinduja Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-24-2012
1....W.P.No.10846 o24. 7.2012 Shri Vivek Dalal, Counsel for the petitioner. Shri Vijay Pandey, learned Dy. A.G.for respondents/State. Shri Vivek Rusia, Counsel for respondents (proposed) No.2,8,12,15,19,35 and 59. Shri Mohd. Firoz, Counsel for respondent No.6. Shri Kapil Jain, Counsel for proposed respondent No.16. Shri Pramod Sahu, Counsel for proposed respondent No.34. Shri Riaz Mohd. Counsel for proposed respondent No.64. Other proposed respondents have already been served by paper publication. A copy of the paper publication is on record showing that the notice on this application was published in daily newspaper Hindustan Times and Nai Dunia on 16.6.2011, as per order dated 25.1.2011 in this petition. We have heard the learned counsel for the parties on I.A.4417/2011. Considering the nature of the application and the dispute involved in this petition, we find it appropriate to allow the application to implead the proposed respondents, as any order passed in the petition may affect...
Prabhunath Singh Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-24-2012
1 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH, PRINCIPAL SEAT, JABALPUR SINGLE BENCH PRESENT: HON'BLE JUSTICE SHRI N. K. GUPTA CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.2668/2008 Prabhunath Singh and two others Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh ........................................................................................................... For the appellant no.1 and 2 : Shri Amit Dubey Advocate. For the respondent: Shri R.P. Tiwari, Government Advocate. For the Objector : Shri P.C. Paliwal, Advocate. ........................................................................................................... JUDGMENT (Delivered on the 24rd day of July, 2012) The appellants have preferred this appeal against the judgment dated 10.12.2008, passed by the Second Additional Sessions Judge, Mauganj, District Rewa in ST. No.36/2007 whereby the appellants were convicted for offence punishable under Section 307 of I.P.C and sentenced for 10 years rigorous imprisonment with fine of Rs.1000/- failing which they had to undergo two ...
Mithlesh Kumar Khampuriya Vs. the State of M.P. and anr.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-24-2012
HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR Writ Petition No :4790. OF 200.Mithlesh Kumar Khampariya - V/s - State of M.P. & another Present : Honble Shri Justice Rajendra Menon. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Shri D.K.Dixit with Shri Ajay Dubey, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri Sanjeev Kumar Singh, learned PL the for respondent/ State. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ORDER ( 24/07/2012) Challenging the order Annexure-R3 dated 6.8.2004 by which petitioner has been dismissed from service and the order Annexure-R4 dated 10.5.2005 passed by the appellate authority rejecting his appeal, petitioner has filed this writ petition.2. Records indicate that the petitioner was working as a Forest Guard in Sizhor Depot District-Mandla under the administrative control of the Divisional Forest Officer, when an incident of fire took place in the depot and in the said incident, fir...
Smt. Aruna Sahu Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-24-2012
W.P.No.11388/2012 (Smt Aruna Sahu versus State of M.P.& ors.) 24.07.2012 Heard Shri N.S.Ruprah,learned counsel for the petitioner on the question of admission. The petitioner has filed this petition seeking a writ of Habeas Corpus against the respondent No.2, who is the mother of child Ayush in question, aged about 13 years of age. It is alleged that the respondent No.2 was responsible for abating her husband, brother of the petitioner to commit suicide, which fact is evident from the suicide note left by him, copy of which has been filed as Annexure P-1. It is submitted that because of the illicit relations, she was having with another person, the father in his suicide note has written that he wanted to retain the child with the petitioner and not with the respondent No.2. It is further being brought on record that the respondent No.2 has filed an application under Section 25 of the Guardian and Wards Act (hereafter referred to as 'the Act').which is pending decision before the Additi...
Ku.Nidhi Sharma Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-24-2012
1 W.P. No. 14630/2006 24.7.2012 None for the petitioner. Shri Puneet Shroti, learned Govt. Advocate for respondent Nos. 1 and 2. Shri Anoop Nair, learned counsel for respondent No. 3. Shri Uttam Maheshwari, learned counsel for respondent No. 5. With consent the matter is heard finally. Petitioner, a physically handicapped, was in waiting list No. 26 and was given admission against physically handicapped quota in M.B.B.S Course in Netaji Subha Chandra Bose, Medical College, Jabalpur on 29.8.2006. The said admission was, however, cancelled by order dated 28.9.2006 whereon one Nitin Mantri, 40% visually handicapped and in the merit list No. 1 was given the admission on the basis of decision in W.P. No. 10648/2006 decided on 26.9.2006. The decision in W.P. No. 10648/2006 was subjected to challenge in Writ Appeal No. 1276/2006 by Medical Council of India; wherein, it is held that a visual i...
Smt.Prakash Mishra Vs. M.P.Legal Aid and Legal Ad.Board and anr.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-24-2012
1 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR Miscellaneous Petition No :730. Of 1992 Smt. Prakash Mishra V/s Madhya Pradesh Legal Aid and Legal Advice Board Present : Honble Shri Justice Rajendra Menon. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Shri Anil Lala, learned counsel for the petitioner. Smt. Sharda Dubey, learned Panel Lawyer for respondent. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ORDER 24.7.2012 This petition was filed by the petitioner in the year 1992 and at that point of time grievance of petitioner was that her appointment with the M.P. Legal Aid and Legal Advice Board constituted under the M.P. Samaj Ke Kamzor Vargon Ke Liye Vidhik Sahayta Tatha Vidhik Salah Adhiniyam, 1976 (hereinabove referred to as an Act of 1976) have been illegally terminated. The order impugned terminating the service of petitioner is Annexure P-4 dated 25.1.1992 and it is the case of petitioner th...
Ram Bahadur Tiwari Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-24-2012
1 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR Writ Petition No :16042. Of 2007 (s) Ram Bahadur Tiwari V/s State of Madhya Pradesh & Others Present : Honble Shri Justice Rajendra Menon. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Shri Ashish Pathak, learned counsel for the petitioner. Smt. B.P. Pandey, learned Dy. Government Advocate for respondent/State. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ORDER 24.7.2012 Challenging the orders of compulsory retirement passed, by the Disciplinary Authority and the Appellate Authority in the matter of punishing the petitioner after a Departmental Enquiry, this writ petition has been filed.2. Orders in question impugned in this writ petition are Annexure P-7 dated 30.3.2007, Annexure P-9 dated 27.7.2007 and Annexure P-10 dated 7.9.2007. Petitioner was working as a Constable and was posted in the Reserve Inspector's Office, Police Lines Jabalpur. In the ...
M/S Som Distilleries Pvt.Ltd. Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-24-2012
1....W.P.No.9443 o24. 7.2012 Shri Prem Francis, Counsel for the petitioner. Shri M.P.S.Raghuwanshi, learned Addl. Advocate General for the respondents/State. A prayer is made for an adjournment as Senior Advocate Shri Ravindra Shrivastava could not come. Prayer is vehemently opposed by Shri Raghuwanshi who submitted that on 26 occasions, the case has been adjourned because of the prayer of the petitioner. So it is submitted that heavy cost may be imposed on the petitioner. It is also submitted that recovery of 16 crores has been stayed in this case. Though the aforesaid contention is opposed by Shri Fransis but considering the facts of the case, we adjourn hearing of this petition for 21.8.2012, as agreed by the parties with a condition that in case on the next date of hearing any adjournment is prayed on behalf of the petitioner, petitioner shall be liable to pay cost of Rs.1,00,000/- to the State. (Krishn Kumar Lahoti) (Smt. Vimla Jain) Judge Judge vj...
Smt. Kirti Chourasiya Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-24-2012
1....W.A.No.53 o23. 7.2012 Smt. Shobha Menon, learned Senior Advocate with Shri C.A.Thomas, Counsel for the appellant. Shri Vijay Pandey, learned Dy. A.G.for respondents No.1 and 2. Shri Jitendra Tiwari, Counsel for respondent No.5. Learned Dy. A.G.submitted that today Shri G.N.Agrawal, Joint Director, Directorate of Skill Development is present in Court. He has also shown a copy of order dated 13.7.2012 by which petitioner has been transferred from Chhindwara to AdaRs.Jabalpur which was on own cost. It is submitted that grievance of the appellant has come to an end, as she has been accommodated at Jabalpur but Smt. Menon, learned Senior Advocate submitted that till date the order has not been received by the appellant. However, as per the virbal instructions received by the appellant, it is intimated to the concerned authority that she be not relieved. On raising such contention, the Joint Director submitted that the order has been sent to the Principal concerned by mail and the appel...
Pankaj Vikas Khare Vs. the M.P.State Tourism Corporation Ltd.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-24-2012
1 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH PRINCIPAL SEAT AT JABALPUR Writ Petition No.1046/2010 Pankaj Vikas Khare S/o Late Shri R.B.Khare......................Petitioner VERSUS The M.P. State Tourism Corporation Limited and Ors. ....Respondents ======== For the petitioner :Shri Vishal Dhagat, Advocate. For the respondents : Shri P.K. Kaurav, Dy. Advocate General with Shri K.Dwivedi, Advocate. Present :- Hon'ble Shri Justice Alok Aradhe ORDER (24-07-2012) In this writ petition, the petitioner, inter alia, seeks a direction to the respondents to reckon his seniority from the date of his initial appointment i.e, 11-11-1986 and to grant him all consequential benefits.2. In order to appreciate the petitioner's grievance, few facts need mention which are stated infra. The petitioner was appointed on the post of Assistant Manager(Hotel) on probation in Madhya Pradesh State Tourism Corporation Limited vide order dated 11-11-1986. The period of probation of the petitioner was extended vide order dated 06...
- ‹ Prev
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 41
- 42
- 43
- 44
- 45
- Next ›
- Last »