Madhya Pradesh Court July 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Bhola Prasad and ors. Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-26-2012
1 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH, PRINCIPAL SEAT, JABALPUR SINGLE BENCH PRESENT: HON'BLE JUSTICE SHRI N. K. GUPTA CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.543/2000 Bholaprasad and 5 others Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh ........................................................................................................... For the appellants : Shri Raman Patel, Advocate. For the respondent : Shri G. S. Thakur, Panel Lawyer. For the complainant : Shri A.K. Paroha. ........................................................................................................... JUDGMENT (Delivered on the 26th day of July, 2012) The appellants have preferred this appeal against the judgment dated 18.2.2000, passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Mauganj, District Rewa in ST. No.93/1998 whereby the appellants were convicted for offences punishable under Sections 307 read with Section 149 & 148 of I.P.C and sentenced for 7 years rigorous imprisonment with fine of Rs.500/- and six months rigorous imprisonment respective...
Vijay Shankar Pandey Vs. Chancellor, Bhoj Open University, Bhopal
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-26-2012
1 W.P.No.7478/2012 Vijay Shankar Pandey versus Bhoj Open University & ORS.26.07.2012 Shri Hakim Khan learned counsel for the petitioner. Smt.P.L. Shrivastava learned counsel for respondent no.1. Heard on the question of admission. The petitioner has filed this petition being aggrieved not by any specific order but by the act of the respondents in changing the examination centre for the examination conducted by the respondent no.1 from Chakghat to Thakur Ranmat Singh Mahavidyalaya, Rewa. It is alleged that the changed centre is 90 kms away and is, therefore, causing great inconvenience to the petitioner who has undertaken the examination of M.Sc (Prev.) which is conducted by the Bhoj Open University. The learned counsel for the respondent no.1, on the basis of the averments made in the return, has pointed out that there are several complaints from the student of the Nehru Smarak Mahavidyalaya, Chakghat to the effect that the Principal of the centre has not conducting the examination in ...
Akhand Prasad Dwivedi Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-26-2012
W.P.No.10184/2012 (A.P.Dwivedi and another versus State of MP and another) 26.07.2012 Heard Shri Y.P.Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioners on the question of admission and interim relief. The petitioners have filed this petition alleging deliberate inaction on the part of the respondent No.2 against the Sarpanch, Secretary and others of Gram Panchayat Jhakharawal, Tahsil Deosar District Singrouli inspite of the fact that there is an enquiry report submitted by the Sub Divisional Officer, Deosar against them. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioneRs.I am of the considered opinion that the appropriate remedy of the petitioner is to approach the Collector, Singrouli for mitigation of their grievance and therefore, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the petition filed by the petitioners is disposed of with a direction to the effect that in case the petitioners file a proper representation before the Collector, Singrouli within 15 days along with a c...
Betwa Swa Sahayata Samooh Th: Smt. Shanti Pandey Vs. the State of Madh ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-26-2012
W.P.No.10246/2012 (Betwa Swa Sahayata Samooh versus State of MP and otheRs.26.07.2012 Heard Shri V.D.S.Chouhan, learned counsel for the petitioner on the question of admission. The petitioner has filed this petition being aggrieved by order dated 17.05.2012 passed by the Sub Divisional Officer, Beohari, District Shahdol whereby work of supply of mid-day-meal has been ordered to be taken away from the petitioner and with a further direction to hand it over to the respondent No.6. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the impugned order is contrary to law against which he has filed a representation before the Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat, Shahdol which is pending consideration. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. Looking to the fact that there is a conflict of interest between the Zila Panchayat and Sub Divisional Officer, it would be appropriate to dispose of this petition with a direction to the effect that in case the petitioner files a fresh ...
Rajeev Kumar Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-26-2012
1 Criminal Rev No.492/2012 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH : JABALPUR (SINGLE BENCH : HONBLE SHRI M.A. SIDDIQUI, J.Criminal Rev No.492/2012 Rajeev Kumar. APPLICANT VERSUS The State of Madhya Pradesh. RESPONDENT Shri R. K. Samaiya, Advocate for applicant. Shri Akshya Namdeo P.L.. for respondent/State. Order Reserved on 10.07.2012 Order Passed on 26.07.2012 ORDER This criminal revision u/s 397/401 Code of Criminal Procedure,1973 (hereinafter referred to for short 'Cr.P.C.') has been filed in order to quash the order dated 13.12.2011 passed by 4th Additional Sessions Judge, Tikamgarh in Sessions Trial No.244/2009 (State of M.P. v. Ashok Gurjar and another) by which learned trial Court has framed the charge u/ss 467,468, and 471 of IPC and u/s 3/7 of Essential Commodities Act, against the applicant.2. In nut shell, the facts of the prosecution case are that on 6.6.2009 at 17.30 (5.30 p.m.) at Kitakhera Tigaila (Tiraha) about 3 K.M. away from Jatara towards Tikamgarh, Ashok driver co-accused w...
Hari Krishna @ Krishna Vs. the State of M.P.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-26-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH, JABALPUR SB: Honble Shri Justice N.K.Gupta, J.Criminal Appeal No.2283/1996 Harikrishna Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh .................................................................................................... Shri Manish Datt, Senior Advocate with Shri Ajay Mishra, for the appellant. Shri G. S. Thakur, Panel Lawyer for the respondent/State. .................................................................................................... JUDGMENT (Delivered on the 26th day of July, 2012)) The appellant has preferred this appeal against the judgment dated 11.12.1996 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Khurai in Sessions Trial No.101/1996 whereby the appellant was convicted for offences punishable under Sections 376(1) and 457 of I.P.C and sentenced for seven years rigorous imprisonment with fine of Rs.1000/- and two years rigorous imprisonment with fine of Rs.500/-, in default of payment of fine he was to undergo for two months rigorous...
Kharya Charitable Society Vs. Madhyamik Shiksha Mandal
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-26-2012
HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH: JABALPUR Writ Petition No.4158 / 2010 Kharya Charitable Society, Narsinghpur, M.P. Versus Madhyamik Shiksha Mandal, Bhopal and another ______________________________________________ Shri Mohd. Ali, counsel for the petitioner. Shri T.S.Ruprah, senior counsel with Shri Harmeet Singh Ruprah, for the respondent No.1. Shri Sanjay Verma, counsel for the respondent No.2. ______________________________________________ PRESENT : Honble Shri R.S. Jha, J.: ORDER (26-07-2012) The petitioner has filed this petition being aggrieved by the decision of the respondent No.1/Board, dated 4-11-2009 whereby the father's name mentioned in the mark sheet issued by the respondent No.1 has been changed to Badri Prasad Kharya by scoring out the name of Shri Ashok Kumar Sohane.2. The brief facts leading to the filing of the present petition are that the petitioner is a charitable society and has been entrusted to manage some part of the property of deceased Badri Prasad Kharya. In t...
Smt. Amit Kour Bhatiya Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-26-2012
W.P.No.10566 / 2012 (Smt. Amit Kour Bhatia versus State of MP & otheRs.26-07-2012 Shri Brajesh Dubey, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri S.S.Bisen, learned G.A., for the State/respondents. After arguing at length when confronted with the decision of a Division Bench of this Court rendered in W.P.No.18821/2010 (Shaheed Khan & others versus State of M.P.& otheRs.decided on 18-5-2011, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petition filed by the petitioner be disposed of with a direction to the Regional Transport Authority, Shahdol to consider and decide the petitioner's application for renewal of permit (Annexure P-5) in accordance with law. In the circumstances, in view of the limited prayer made by the petitioner, which is not opposed by the learned Government Advocate, appearing for the State/respondents, the petition filed by the petitioner is disposed of with a direction that the respondent/Regional Transport Authority, Shahdol shall decide the application for ...
Rameshwari Malviya Vs. Sushila Dhruve
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-26-2012
Cr.R. No.2178 /11 26.7.2012 Shri Satyam Agarwal, Adv. for applicants/petitioners. Shri P.R. Bhave Sr. Adv. with Shri Bhanu Pratap Yadav, Adv. for respondent no.1. Shri Sameer Chile,Govt. Adv. for respondent No.2 /State. Heard finally. Petitioners Rameshwari Malvidya and Surendra Malviya have been convicted u/s 451 and 324 of IPC and sentenced to Regorous Imprisonment for 3 months, one year with fine of Rs.500/--500/- each by J.M.F.C. Sehore in criminal case no.574/05 vide judgment dated 9.2.2011 for causing simple hurt to complainant Sushila Dhurve respondent no.1. In appeal, bearing cri. appeal no.59/11 by First Additional Sessions Judge Sehore vide judgment dated 28.11.2011 partly allowed the appeal modifying the sentence till rising the Court (TRC) and fine of Rs.2000/- each; against which this petition has been filed to set aside the conviction and sentence.2. I have heard both the sides and perused the judgments available in the case.3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has argue...
Ramayan Prasad Tiwari Vs. the State of M.P.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-26-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH, JABALPUR SINGLE BENCH : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE N.K.GUPTA, J.Criminal Appeal No.1170/1997 Ramayan Prasad Tiwari VERSUS State of Madhya Pradesh --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Shri S.K.P.Varma, counsel for the appellant. Shri G.S.Thakur, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondent. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- JUDGMENT (Delivered on the 26th day of July, 2012) The appellant has preferred this appeal against the judgment dated 24.5.1997 passed by the learned Special Judge, Rewa under SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act in Special case No.27/1995, whereby the appellants were convicted for offence punishable under section 3 (1) (x) of SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (hereinafter it will be referred to as 'Special Act') and section 323 of IPC and sentenced for six months' rigorous imprisonment with fine of Rs.500/- and 3 months' rigorous imprisonment. In default o...
- ‹ Prev
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 39
- Next ›
- Last »