Madhya Pradesh Court June 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Madan Chand JaIn Vs. Dwarka Prasad Jain
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-25-2012
W.P.No.2467/2012 M.C.Jain versus Dwarka Prasad & Ors.) 25.06.2012 Heard Shri Sankalp Kochar, learned counsel for the petitioner on the question of admission. Inspite of notices being issued by this court, none appeared on behalf of the respondents. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the prayer for summoning Dr. Mahesh Dixit, Orthopedic Surgeon and Sr.Medical Officer, Govt. J.P.Hospital, Bhopal has been rejected only on account of the fact that he did not pay the travelling expenses alongwith the process fee and in such circumstances, the impugned order be quashed and he be permitted to examine the aforesaid doctor in accordance with the law. He further submits that he was permitted to do so by a direction issued by this court in W.P.No.7695/2011 dated 11.11.2011. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and find that the order passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Begumganj, district Raisen to be absolutely without application of mind, per...
M/S Excel Carriers Private Limited Vs. Municipal Corporation
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-25-2012
1 W.P.No.8747/2012 M/s Excel Carriers PVT.LTD.versus Municipal Corporation. 25.06.2012 Heard Shri Maninder S. Bhatti learned counsel for the petitioner, on the question of admission. The petitioner has filed this petition alleging that the respondent Corporation, inspite of a direction being issued by this Court in W.P No.14401/2008, has not decided the representation of the petitioner wherein he has claimed allotment of an alternative plot on account of the fact that the plot no.C-9 allotted to him in Transport Nagar, Jabalpur for which premium has also been paid by the petitioner is said to be a disputed plot. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that though two notices have been issued to the petitioner asking him to submit documents, the respondent has not decided the representation since 2008 and has kept it pending since the last four years in total ignorance of the direction issued by this Court. Looking to the fact that this Court has already issued a direc...
Ku. Roshni Gautam Vs. Dr. Hari Singh Gour Vishvidyalaya
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-25-2012
1 W.P. No. 8596/2010 25.6.2012 Shri A.K. Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner. Ms. Surabhi Ahirkar, learned counsel for respondent Nos. 1 to 3. Shri Pradeep Sharma, learned counsel for respondent No. 4. None for respondent No. 5 though served Hamdast, as apparent vide affidavit dated 29.4.2012 filed by the petitioner. Learned counsel for the parties are heard. Petitioner a GATE qualified student pursuing her Master in Pharmacy (M. Pharma) from Dr. Hari Singh Gour Vishwa Vidyalaya, Sagar, a Central University has filed this petition seeking direction to respondents that being qualified she is entitled to Post Graduate Scholarship/Stipend of Rs.8000/. It is the contention of the petitioner that instead the scholarship is granted to respondent No. 5. It is a matter of record that 8 seats ( 5 General and 3 SC/ ST) for Post Graduate Course in Pharma BioTechnology in respondent Vishvidyalaya is approved by All India Council...
Bhawani Prasad Gupta Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-25-2012
W.P.No.5513.06 Writ Petition No.5513 o25. 06/2012 Shri S.K.Garg, learned counsel for the petitioneRs.Heard on admission. This petition is directed against the order dated 22-12-2005 whereby claim of the petitioners for grant of compensation in respect of alleged contention that they are gas affected persons has been declined. Petitioners on the basis of the contention that they are resident of house near Suryalok Hotel, Ghoda Nakkas, Bhopal, filed the claim before the Deputy Commissioner, Bhopal Gas VictiMs.who on a finding that the petitioners were not the resident of area which they have claimed, rejected the application whereagainst the petitioners preferred an appeal before the Additional Commissioner, Bhopal Gas VictiMs.who by order dated 20-06-2003 dismissed the same. Aggrieved, petitioners preferred suo- motu revision before the Welfare Commissioner, Bhopal Gas VictiMs.who by his order dated 22-12-2005 rejected the same. While recording the fact that the applicant Bhawani Prasad...
Mahesh Kumar Shivhare Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-25-2012
W.P.No.9060/2012 25.06.2012 Shri Arun Nema, learned counsel for the petitioner. Heard on the question of admission. The grievance of the petitioner in this writ petition is that he is frequently transferred from one place to another after his posting at Hoshangabad vide order dated 15.6.2010. When he was issued an order of shifting, he approached this Court by way of filing W.P.No.6944/2012, which came up for hearing on 7.5.2012. This Court permitted the petitioner to withdraw the said writ petition with liberty to prosecute his representation made before the authorities who were directed to decide the same by a reasoned order within a period of thirty days from the date of communication of the order. It is the contention of the petitioner that the order has not been passed on the representation of the petitioner though he was attached at Hoshanabad, by order impugned he is shifted from Hoshangabad to Betul district. Thus, it is contended that the order impugned has been issued without...
Ramanju Gupta Vs. Managing Committee
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-25-2012
HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR SINGLE BENCH PRESENT : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE N. K. GUPTA FIRST APPEAL NO.50/2010 Ramanuj Gupta and 7 others -VERSUS- Managing Committee, Azad Higher Secondary School Katra Bazar, Sagar, Tehsil Sagar, District Sagar through Members and office bearers and 4 others ................................................................................................. Shri J.L. Agnihotri, counsel for the appellants. Shri Mukhtar Ahmad, counsel for the respondents. .................................................................................................... JUDGMENT (Delivered on the 25th day of June, 2013) The appellants have challenged the order dated 21.9.2005 passed by IIIrd Additional District Judge, Sagar in Civil Suit No.24-A of 2005 in which it was directed that the trial Court did not have any jurisdiction to hear the suit and therefore, suit was dismissed by the trial Court.2. The facts of the case in short are that the appellants have move...
Smt. Suman Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-25-2012
1 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH : JABALPUR WRIT PETITION No.8790/2012 Kinnar Kamla Chela Suraj Jan Guru versus State of Madhya Pradesh & others ____________________________________________________________ Shri Raveesh Agrawal, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Shri Anshuman Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri Prasant Singh, learned Additional Advocate General, for respondents No.1 and 3. Shri Siddharth Seth, learned Counsel for respondent No.2. ____________________________________________________________ WRIT PETITION No.8607/2012 Smt. Suman versus State of Madhya Pradesh & others ____________________________________________________________ Shri Sanjay K. Agrawal and Shri Rajesh Chand, learned Counsel for the petitioner. Shri Prasant Singh, learned Additional Advocate General, for respondents No.1 and 3. Shri Siddharth Seth, learned Counsel for respondent No.2. ____________________________________________________________ Present : Honble Shri Justice K.K.Trivedi __________...
Sharda Prasad Tripathi Vs. Incharge Accounts Officer
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-25-2012
W.P.No.10269/2010 25.6.2012 Shri Nimesh Shrivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri Vivek Sharma, learned Panel Lawyer for the respondents. The petitioner is the nominee of his wife Late Smt. Lalita Devi who was working as Teacher in Junior High School, Sohagi Block, Teonther, District Rewa and had retired on voluntary basis w.e.f.31.7.2004. After retirement when post retiral benefits were not been paid to her, she represented to the State Government, ultimately she expired in the year 2005. Claiming payment of benefit which remain unpaid to his wife after her death in the year 2005 and contending that petitioner is a nominee of his wife and entitled to pension and various other amounts pertaining to payment of contributory provident fund, etc.petitioner has filed this writ petition. On notice being issued respondents have filed reply and it is pointed out by the respondents in para 3 and 4 as under :- "3. It is submitted that there were number of deficiencies like (i) death ...
Gurukul Higher Secondary School Vs. Deepesh Singh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-25-2012
R.P.No.445/2012 (Gurukul Higher Secondary School versus Deepesh Singh and otheRs.25.06.2012 Shri Pranay Verma, learned counsel for the applicant. Heard on the question of admission. The applicant has sought review/modification of the order dated 18.01.2012 passed in W.P.No.841/12 whereby this court on the petition filed by the petitioner Deepesh Singh had disposed of the petition with a direction to the respondents No.2,4,5, 7,8,and 9 therein to look into the complaint filed by the petitioner and deal with the same expeditiously, in accordance with law after hearing all concerned and in case necessary action is required to be take, same may be taken in accordance with law by passing a reasoned order. It is submitted that the applicant who was respondent No.12 in the petition that the complaint of the original petitioner had already been examined, however, in compliance of the order passed by this court, the concerned authorities are not taking into consideration the previous report fil...
Smt. Premwati Kashyap Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-25-2012
Criminal Appeal No.2981/2011 25.6.2012 Shri R.N.Shrivastava, counsel for the appellant. Shri G.S.Thakur, Panel Lawyer for the State/ respondent No.1. None for the remaining respondents. Present matter is criminal appeal against the judgment of acquitted passed by the trial Court. Instead of hearing the matter on the question of admission, notices were issued to the respondents. Heard the learned counsel for the parties on the question of admission. The respondents were convicted for offence punishable under section 498-A of IPC and section 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act vide judgment dated 8.12.2010 passed by learned JMFC, Jabalpur (Shri Ashish Shrivastava) in criminal case No.2776/2008 and sentenced for one year's rigorous imprisonment with fine of Rs.100/- and 3 yeaRs.rigorous imprisonment with fine of Rs.100/-. In criminal appeal No.9/2011, learned 12th Additional Sessions Judge, Jabalpur vide judgment dated 20.9.2011 accepted the appeal and acquitted the respondents from all the charge...
- ‹ Prev
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- Next ›
- Last »