Madhya Pradesh Court June 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Mukesh JaIn Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-26-2012
1 Criminal Revision No.695/12 26.06.2012. Shri N.K.Jain, Counsel for petitioneRs.Shri Akshay Namdeo, learned Panel Lawyer for the respondent-State. Heard finally with the consent of learned counsel for the parties. This petition under Section 397/401 of Cr.P.C.has been filed by the petitioners against the charge put by Ist Addl. Sessions Judge, Narsinghpur on 20.03.2012 for offence punishable under Section 306/34 IPC in ST No.55/12. The charges framed are annexed as Annexure-A1 to the petition. Prosecution case, in brief, is that deceased Kamlesh Jain son of Gyan Chand Jain who was uncle of petitioner no.1committed suicide by consuming some poisonous substance on 5.10.11 leaving behind a suicide note at his house. Petitioner no.2 is wife of petitioner no.1 and petitioner no.3 is brother of petitioner no.2. It was revealed that Kamlesh committed suicide due to harassment and torture made by petitioneRs.Police registered offence under Section 306/34 IPC, and after due investigation charg...
Prem Lal Irpache Vs. Union of India
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-26-2012
1 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH PRINCIPAL SEAT AT JABALPUR W.P. No.12421/2007 PREM LAL IRPACHE VS. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Present: Honble Shri Justice Rajendra Menon. Shri Anubhav Jain, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri Vikram Singh, learned counsel for the respondents. ______________________________________________ Whether approved for reporting: Yes/ No ORDER ( 2662012 ) 1. Challenging the orders passed by the competent authority, appellate authority so also the revisional authority as contained in Annexures P/1, P/2 and P/3 dated 25 March, 2005, 2nd April, 2000 and 4.10.99, dismissing the petitioner from service and rejecting his appeal and revision, this writ petition has been filed.2. Petitioner joined the Central Industrial Security Force as a 'Sepoy' in the year 1982. He was promoted on the post of Head Constable and according to the petitioner 2 he has an unblemished service record of more than 17 years. At the relevant time in the year 1998 it is stated that petitioner w...
Kammu @ Kamlesh Vs. the State of M.P.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-26-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH, JABALPUR SINGLE BENCH : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE N.K.GUPTA, J.Criminal Appeal No.2517/1997 Kammu @ Kamlesh VERSUS State of Madhya Pradesh --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Shri H.S.Dubey, counsel for the appellant. Shri Ajay Tamrakar, Panel Lawyer for the State/ respondent. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- JUDGMENT (Delivered on the 26th day of June, 2012) The appellant has preferred this appeal against the judgment dated 22.11.1997 passed by Sessions Judge, Raisen in S.T.No.97/1993, whereby the appellant was convicted for offence punishable under section 354 of IPC and sentenced for one year's Rigorous Imprisonment.2. Prosecution's case, in short, is that, on 13.1.1993, at about 12.30 p.m., the prosecutrix (P.W.1) went to the river near village Dhokheda, Police Station Bareli, District Raisen to take bath. When she was wearing her clothes after taking bath, the appellant...
Shailendra Kumar Tripathi Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-26-2012
1 W.P No.10137/2010 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH : JABALPUR W.P. No.10137/2010 Shailendra Kumar Tripathi Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh Present : Honble Shri Justice R.S. Jha. For the petitioner : Shri M.L.Jaiswal, Sr. Advocate with Shri Manot Kushwaha, Advocate. For the respondents : Shri Puneet Shroti, Panel Lawyer. ORDER (26.06.2012) The petitioner has filed this petition being aggrieved by order dated 21.06.2010, passed by the Mining Officer, Satna by which the petitioner's application for grant of quarry lease over an area 6.583 hectares of Khasra No.78/1 , 12/5 , 12/5 and 12/5 of village Tatiyajhir, district Satna has been rejected on the ground that in view of the amendment in the Rules affected from 09.02.2010, querry lease can be granted only through public auction and not on the basis of individual application.2. It is submitted by the learned Senior counsel 2 W.P No.10137/2010 appearing for the petitioner that the application for grant of querry lease was filed by the petitio...
Prem Prakash Ambedkar Vs. the Director,regional Medical Res.Cen.Anda
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-26-2012
HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADEESH JABALPUR (Writ Petition No.543/2004) Prem Prakash Ambedakar. Vs. The Director, RMRC (ICMR), Jabalpur and others PRESENT : HONOURABLE SHRI JUSTICE AJIT SINGH HONOURABLE SHRI JUSTICE SANJAY YADAV Petitioner in person Counsel for Respondents Shri Ashish Shroti, Advocate O R D E R (26/07/2012) The following order of the Court was delivered by Sanjay Yadav, J : This petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is directed against the order dated 19.9.2003 passed by Central Administrative Tribunal, Jabalpur Bench, Jabalpur; whereby, by common order Transferred Application Nos. 14/2000 and 3/2002 were dismissed.2. Transferred Application No. 14/2000 was directed against the order dated 13.2.1992 and 26.5.1993 whereby the petitioner was placed under suspension and his subsistence allowance was stopped; whereas vide T.A. No. 3/2002 petitioner challenged the order dated 30.9.1993; whereby service of the petitioner was dismissed....
Jaggu Korku Vs. the State of M.P.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-26-2012
1 AFR HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH PRINCIPAL SEAT AT JABALPUR DIVISION BENCH Criminal Reference No.2/2011 IN REFEENCE Received from III Additional Sessions Judge (Fast Track Court), Narsinghpur, M.P.. Versus 1. Rahul Rajak, s/o Ashok Rajak, aged about 25 years, resident of Near Shyam Talkies, Narsinghpur (M.P.).2. Ashok Kumar, s/o Bhawani Prasad Vishwakarma, aged 37 years, resident of Ganesh Nagar, Bargi Colony, Narsinghpur, Police Station, Tehsil and District Narsinghpur (M.P.).3. Satish Parochi, s/o Imrat Lal Parochi, aged 28 years, resident of Housing Board Colony, Police Station, Narsinghpur (M.P.). ---------------------------------------------------------- For the State: Shri Umesh Pandey,Govt. Advocate. For the Complainant: Shri Surendra Singh,Sr. Advocate, with Shri Ashwani Kumar Dubey, advocate. For the Respondents/: Shri S.C. Datt, Sr. Advocate, Accused with Shri Siddharth Datt,Advocate, Shri R.S. Patel, Shri Alok Vagrecha, advocates. ------------------------------------------...
QamaruddIn Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-26-2012
HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH, JABALPUR Miscellaneous Criminal Case No.7366/2011 Qamaruddin..Petitioner Versus State of Madhya Pradesh..Respondent For the petitioner : Shri Rajendra Babbar, Advocate. For the respondent: Shri Aditya Adhikari with Shri Abhishek Gulatee, Advocates. ****** Present: HONOURABLE SHRI JUSTICE AJIT SINGH HONOURABLE SHRI JUSTICE SANJAY YADAV ****** ORDER (26.6.2012) The following order of the Court was passed by Ajit Singh, J.By this petition, filed under section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973, the petitioner has essentially prayed for quashing of the first information report dated 26.3.2009 and the order dated 1.2.2011, Annexure A1, passed by the Special Judge (Prevention of Corruption Act), Bhopal, in Special Case No.9/2010.2. During the relevant period the petitioner was posted as Assistant Estate Officer in the Bhopal Development Authority. One K. C. Malkani, a resident of Bhopal, made a written complaint in the month of November 2003, Annexure R1...
Mahila Bahu Uddeshiya Sahkari Samiti Maryadit Beslee Vs. the State of ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-26-2012
1 W.P.No.8404/2012 Mahila Bhahuuddesiya Sahkari Samiti versus State of M.P.& ORS.26.06.2012 Shri Gopi Chourasia learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri R.P.Tiwari, learned Govt. Advocate, for the respondent/State. Heard on the question of admission. The petitioner has filed this petition being aggrieved by the show cause notices dated 24.5.2012, Annexures P-1, issued by the SDO Banda, District Sagar proposing to cancel the allotment of the fair price shop allotted to them under the provisions of the M.P.(Food Stuff) Public Distribution Scheme 1991 pursuant to and subsequent to coming into force of the M.P.Public Distribution Scheme (Control) Order, 2009 (hereinafter referred to as the Control Order, 2009).It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that a Division Bench of this Court in W.P No.3487/2010 has upheld the validity of the Control Order, 2009. It is further stated that in an identical petition i.e.W.A No.52/2012, a Division Bench of this Court has held that sh...
The State of M.P. Vs. Amarnath
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-26-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH, JABALPUR SB: Honble Mr. Justice N.K.Gupta, J.Criminal Appeal No.1887 of 1997 State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Amarnath ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Shri G. S. Thakur, Panel Lawyer for the State/appellant. Shri Ajay Tamrakar, counsel for the respondent. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- JUDGMENT (Delivered on the 26th day of June, 2012) The appellant/State has preferred this appeal against the judgment dated 10.4.1997 (Shri Sudip Kumar Shrivastava) passed by learned JMFC Amarpatan, District Satna in Criminal Case No.260/1994 whereby the respondent was acquitted from the charges of offence punishable under Section 324 of I.P.C.2. Prosecution's case in short is that on 19.7.1991 the victim Shobnath Patel (P.W.1) was grazing cattles near garden of accused situated in village Mohat, Police Station Amarpatan. At about 10.00 a.m, the responde...
President Bahu Uddeshiya Mahila Sahkari Samiti Maryadit Vs. Principal ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-26-2012
1 W.P.No.8434/2012 Bahu Uddeshiya Mahila Sahkari Samiti versus State of M.P.& ORS.26.06.2012 Shri Deepak Awasthi learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri R.P.Tiwari, learned Govt. Advocate, for the respondent/State. Heard on the question of admission. The petitioner has filed this petition being aggrieved by the show cause notices dated 24.5.2012, Annexures P-3 & 4, issued by the SDO Banda, District Sagar proposing to cancel the allotment of the fair price shop allotted to them under the provisions of the M.P.(Food Stuff) Public Distribution Scheme 1991 pursuant to and subsequent to coming into force of the M.P.Public Distribution Scheme (Control) Order, 2009 (hereinafter referred to as the Control Order, 2009).It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that a Division Bench of this Court in W.P No.3487/2010 has upheld the validity of the Control Order, 2009. It is further stated that in an identical petition i.e.W.A No.52/2012, a Division Bench of this Court has held th...
- ‹ Prev
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- Next ›
- Last »