Madhya Pradesh Court May 2012 Judgments

Gahoi Food Private Limited Vs. Union of India

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Heard. The petitioner has filed this petition with the following reliefs:- “(a) That, a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction may kindly be issued for quashing the impugned order/communication dated 31-03-2012 (Annexure P/ 1) issued by the respondent no.3, with direction to the respondents in particular to the respondents No. 2, 3 and 4 not to create any interference or obstruction in the usual functioning of the petitioner – company in respect of production, storing and selling of commodity “ Gutka” (b) That, any other such orders or directions which the Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case, be also passed along-with the costs of the writ petition.” The petitioner is a Private Limited Company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956. As per the petitioner- Company, it is engaged in production and sale of ''Gutka'' in the State of Madhya Pradesh under the brand name “Puja...

M/S. Technical Associates Limited Vs. the Assistant Labour Commissione ...

Court: Madhya Pradesh

ORDER The following order of the Court was passed by Ajit Singh, J. 1. Since both Writ Petition Nos.3956/2009 and 14029/2009 involve a common issue, they were heard together and are being decided by this order. 2. The petitioners are companies and registered under the Companies Act. They are contractors of electrical works. Respondent no.2 is also a company registered under the Companies Act. It is wholly controlled by the State Government. 3. The petitioners have been awarded contracts by respondent no.2 for erection of 33/11 KV S/Ss associated with 33KV and 11KV lines. These contracts have been awarded under Japan Bank of International Cooperation (JBIC) Scheme on TOTAL TURN-KEY BASIS which broadly includes the supply, transportation to work site, storage, insurance, erection, assembling, testing and commissioning of the lines and line equipments. The Scheme is being implemented through Rural Electrification Corporation, New Delhi, by respondent no.2. 4. The relevant Clause 5.2 of th...

Thakat Singh and Another Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and Another

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Reported in: 2012CrLJ2573

Order G.D. Saxena, J. - (1) This revision petition under Sections 397/401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973, has been preferred against an order dated 12th January, 2012 in Sessions Case No.322/11 passed by the Third Additional Sessions Judge Guna (M.P.), dismissing thereby the application of the petitioners-accused for holding them as juveniles. (2) The case of the petitioners are that during trial, the petitioners filed the application stating that on the date of incident, i.e., 14th August, 2011, they were below 18 years of age, hence, being juveniles it was requested that their case be referred to the Juvenile Justice Court for holding an inquiry with regard to determination of their age and trial before the board. The trial Court on the basis of the evidence of the petitioners filed with the application and the evidence collected during investigation, concluded that the petitioners were not juveniles, hence, this revision. (3) The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted...