Madhya Pradesh Court April 2012 Judgments
M/S. Maihar Cement Vs. Union of India and Others
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-25-2012
Sanjay Yadav, J. 1. This order shall lead to final disposal of writ petition Nos. 459/2009 – M/s. Maihar Cement v. Union of India and others; 460/2009M/ s. Maihar Cement v. Union of India and others; 461/2009M/ s. Maihar Cement v. Union of India and others; 463/2009M/ s. Maihar Cement v. Union of India and others; 464/2009M/ s. Maihar Cement v. Union of India and others; 466/2009M/ s. Maihar Cement v. Union of India and others; 468/2009M/ s. Maihar Cement v. Union of India and others; 470/2009M/ s. Maihar Cement v. Union of India and others; 472/2009M/ s. Maihar Cement v. Union of India and others; 473/2009M/ s. Maihar Cement v. Union of India and others; 474/2009M/ s. Maihar Cement v. Union of India and others; 4083/2009M/ s. Maihar Cement v. Union of India and others; 4086/2009M/ s. Maihar Cement v. Union of India and others and 14784/2008 M/s. Maihar Cement v. Union of India and others as the issue raised in these writ petitions being similar. 2. Issue which crops up for consi...
Tag this Judgment!Ashok Kumar Bafna Vs. Kewalchand Bafna and Others
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-20-2012
1. Order dated 17-01-2012 passed by Special Sessions Judge, Harda, in Civil Suit No. 5-A/2011 is being assailed vide this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. By the said order trial Court while allowing the application under Order 7 Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, (hereinafter referred to as the CPC)filed by the respondents/defendants has directed the petitioner to pay advalorem court fees on the value of the sale deed, the validity whereof is being challenged in the suit. 2. The suit as apparent from the plaint brought on record is for declaration, permanent injunction and physical possession of the suit property bearing Khasra No. 140/2 admeasuring 260 sq. ft. whereon two shops admeasuring 20' x 13' are constructed. A declaration is also sought that the sale deed dated 22-03-1999 executed by respondent No. 1 be declared null and void and not binding on the petitioner. Respondent No. 2/defendant No. 2 filed an application under Order 7 Rule 11, CPC, ...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- Next ›