Skip to content

Madhya Pradesh Court March 2012 Judgments

Mar 30 2012

Dr. Sandeep Sharma and Others Vs. M/S. Sai Chhaya Autolink (P) Ltd.

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Decided on: Mar-30-2012

1. This application has been filed under Section 11 (6) r/w Section 11 (4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking constitution of an Arbitral Tribunal for resolving the dispute between the parties. The application was originally filed by Dr. Om Prakash Sharma through his attorney holder and son Dr. Sandeep Sharma. However, during the pendency of this application as Shri Om Prakash Sharma has expired, his legal heirs namely his son Dr. Sandeep Sharma and his daughters have been brought on record. 2. Petitioners claim to be registered owners of a building situated in plot no. 191-A, Zone-I, M. P. Nagar, Bhopal. Respondent is a company registered under the provisions of the Indian Companies Act. Initially, a lease agreement was entered into between the petitioner and the respondent for the purpose of giving the building in question to the respondent for the purpose of establishing an Automobile Showroom and carrying out various business activities. After expiry of the lease...

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 26 2012

Gudda Alias Sultan Singh and Another Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh Throu ...

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Decided on: Mar-26-2012

Reported in: 2012CrLJ3411

Brij Kishore Dube, J. 1. Feeling aggrieved by the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 28.08.09 passed by the learned Additional Judge, Mungaoli, District Ashok Nagar, in Sessions Trial No.110 of 2009 (State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Gudda and another), convicting the appellants under Cr. A. 695 of 2009 Section 449 of IPC and thereby sentencing each of them to suffer rigorous imprisonment for ten years with fine of Rs.1,000/, in default of payment of fine further one year rigorous imprisonment, further convicting appellant, Maan Singh under Section 302 of IPC and Gudda under Section 302 read with Section 34 of IPC and thereby sentencing each of them to suffer rigorous imprisonment for life and fine of Rs.1,000/indefault of payment of fine further one  year imprisonment, with further stipulation that the jail sentences shall run concurrently, the appellants have preferred this appeal under Section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. 2. Prosecution story, in br...

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 19 2012

Devendra Gupta Vs. State of M.P. and Others

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Decided on: Mar-19-2012

1. I. A. No. 3407/12 has been filed for dismissing the writ petition and recalling the order issuing notice on the writ petition. Even though, during the course of hearing of this writ petition today, Shri Abhijeet Awasthy sought permission to withdraw the writ petition but Shri Kishore Shrivastava, learned Sr. Counsel raised serious objections to the same. 2. Having heard learned counsel for the parties, it transpires that the petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking a direction for conducting an enquiry by the High Power Committee constituted in accordance with the judgment rendered by the Supreme Court in the case of Ku. Madhuri Patil Vs. Additional Commissioner and others, A.I.R. 1995 SC 94 . 3. Considering the prayer made by the petitioner, notices were issued and from the objection filed by the respondent no. 7, it transpires that respondent no 7 is an elected representative and has also held office of the minister in the State Cabinet. Respondent no. 7 had contested the e...

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 01 2012

Mohd. Fareed and Others Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh and Others

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Decided on: Mar-01-2012

Ajit Singh, J. Order 1. This order shall also dispose of Writ Petition Nos.6322, 6355, 4880, 4890, 10244, 3887 and 612, all of 2010. All these petitions were heard together because they relate to a common issue. 2. There is an old fruit and vegetable market known as “Nav Bahar Sabji Mandi” since last 20/25 years in the city of Bhopal. The Sabji Mandi is, in fact, situated in the heart of city. With the passage of time, the population of the city has increased manifold. This has resulted into huge congestion and lack of space for fruit and vegetable traders in the Sabji Mandi. The State Government therefore, taking note of the difficulties of such traders, by notification dated 9.11.2000 issued under section 3 of the Madhya Pradesh Krishi Upaj Mandi Adhiniyam, 1972 (in short, “the Adhiniyam”) for the first time established a new market yard for fruit and vegetable traders having 56 acres of land at a place called Karond in Bhopal. On 22.12.2006 the Krishi Upaj Ma...

Tag this Judgment!

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›


Save Judgments · Add Notes · Store Search Results · Organize Client Files

Start your Free Trial