Madhya Pradesh Court December 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ramayan Prasad Sharma Vs. Union of India
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-21-2012
1 W.P.No.21444/2012 Ramayan Prasad Sharma versus Union of India & ORS.21.12.2012 Shri Anoop Singh learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri R.S.Siddiqui learned counsel for the respondent Union of India. The petitioner has filed this petition praying for the following reliefs:- (I) This Hon'ble Court may kindly pleased to call for the relevant record pertaining to the subject matter for kind perusal of this Hon'ble Court. (ii) This, Hon'ble Court may kindly pleased to direct the respondents to furnish the reply of representation Ann.P/1 submitted by petitioner clarifying the result of petitioner with reasons by issuing an appropriate writ order and direction. (iii) This, Hon'ble Court may kindly pleased issue any other Writ, directions, orders which this Hon'ble Court may deems fit and proper, looking to the facts and circumstances of the case. This, Hon'ble Court may kindly pleased to award cost of this petition to him. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the...
Khurshid Bee Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-21-2012
W.P.No.21585/2012 21.12.2012 Shri S.S.Saket, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri P.K.Kaurav, Deputy Advocate General for respondents No.1 to 4 with Shri Kamal Mourya, C.S.P., Burhanpur. It is submitted by Shri Kaurav that husband of the petitioner Jiyaullah Khan was required by police of Police Station Jilapeth, District Jalgaon (Maharashtra).the aforesaid police recorded its Amad at Police Station Shikarpura, District Burhanpur and with the cooperation of local police, the police of police station Jilapeth arrested the husband of the petitioner namely Jiyaullah Khan in an offence under sections 454, 457 and 380 of Indian Penal Code registered as Crime No.331/2012 at police station Jilapeth, District Jalgaon. It is submitted that after arrest of husband of the petitioner namely Jiyaullah Khan, he was produced before the concerned Judicial Magistrate and on 19.12.2012 he was released on bail by the aforesaid Court. It is submitted that he was not in illegal detention of the police and not...
Dayaram Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-21-2012
W.P.No.20739 / 2012 (Dayaram ..versus State of M.P.& others.) 21-12-2012 Shri Sanjay Patel, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri S.S.Bisen, learned G.A.for the State/respondents. Heard on the question of admission and interim relief. The petitioner has filed this petition being aggrieved by the order dated 20-11-2012 passed by the Additional Commissioner, Sagar Division, Sagar, in Appeal No.1177- A/89-2011-12 whereby the order removing the petitioner from the post of Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat, Nivoda, Tahsil Bina, District Sagar passed by the Collector, Sagar, under Section 36 of M.P.Panchayat Raj Avam Gram Swaraj Adhiniyam, 1993 has been affirmed. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the impugned orders removing the petitioner from the post of Sarpanch have been passed without giving any opportunity of hearing to the petitioner in the proceedings before the Collector, Sagar, under Section 36 of M.P.Panchayat Raj Avam Gram Swaraj Adhiniyam, 1993 which was...
Kishore Kumar Chourasia Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-21-2012
W.P.No.21564/2012 (K.K.Chourasia versus State of M.P.& ors.) 21.12.2012 Shri Anshuman Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri S.P.Rai, learned Panel Lawyer for the respondent/State. On directions by this court, the learned Panel Lawyer appearing for the respondent/State on instructions submits that notification for holding the elections of Municipal Council, Umaria have been issued on 18.12.2012 and therefore, the election process has commenced. In view of the fact that the election process has commenced, keeping in kind the bar regarding interference in the process of election enshrined under Article 243 ZG, the petition filed by the petitioner is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to take up all issues in the present petition at an appropriate stage before the appropriate forum in case cause of action survives or arises, if so advised. With the aforesaid liberty, the petition filed by the petitioner stands disposed of. C.C.as per rules. (R.S.Jha) Judge gn...
Manjeet Singh Bhatia Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-21-2012
1 W.P.No.21394/2012 Manjeet Singh Bhatia versus State of M.P.& ORS.21.12.2012 Heard Shri N.S.Ruprah learned counsel for the petitioner, on the question of admission and interim relief. The petitioner has filed this petition being aggrieved by order dated 5.12.2012 passed by the Regional Manager of the respondents increasing the remuneration to be paid to the fishermen in respect of some specified variety of fishes. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the impugned order is contrary to the terms of the agreement entered into by the petitioner with the respondents for the period 2008-2013 wherein it has been provided that the rate of remuneration to be paid to the fishermen is Rs.19/- per kg. for all types of fishes and, therefore, the impugned order is in breach of the terms of the contract entered into by the petitioner with the respondents. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner it is observed that the present petition involves issues which are p...
Ramadhar Soni Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-21-2012
W.P.No.21667/2012 21.12.2012 Shri Rajesh Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner. Heard on the question of admission. Issue notice of this writ petition to the respondents on payment of P.F.within seven days by registered A.D.Notices be made returnable within six weeks. It is contended that petitioner is Class-IV employee working in contingency establishment and according to the State Act, the age of superannuation of Class-IV employees has been enhanced to 62 yeaRs.However, the petitioner is being retired on attaining the age of 60 years on 31.12.2012. considering the aforesaid, till the next consideration of this interim prayer, the petitioner may be allowed to continue on the post. However, he will not get the benefit of equity in case petition fails. List immediately after six weeks. Certified copy as per rules. (K.K.Trivedi) Judge A.Praj....
Mr. Ashok Kumar Kashyap Vs. Dewan Housing Corporation Ltd Company
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-21-2012
W.P.No.21265/2012 (A.K.Kashyap versus Dewan Housing Cor. Ltd.) 21.12.2012 Shri Vishal Dhagat, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for and is permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty to approach the Debt Recovery Tribunal for mitigation of his grievances. On the request of learned counsel for the petitioner, it is directed that to enable the petitioner to approach the Debt Recovery Tribunal and obtain ordeRs.no coercive steps shall be taken against the petitioner by the respondent, for a period of one week from today, i.e., 21.12.12. With the aforesaid liberty/direction, the petition filed by the petitioner stands disposed of. C.C.today. (R.S.Jha) Judge gn...
Ravendra Kumar Paroha Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-21-2012
W.P.No.21169/2012 21/12/2012 Shri P.K.Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioners Shri Ved Prakash Tiwari, learned Panel Lawyer for respondents State Government. Petitioners have challenged the orders dated 15.9.2009 by which the State Govt. has decided to close down the Library and Commuity Centres running in various villages. Questions involved in these writ petitions and tenability of similar action has already been considered and decided by this Court by a common order passed in W.P.No.590/2011(s).W.P.14312/2011(s).W.P.12477/2009 (s) W.P.17/2010 (s) and W.P.No.17445/2010 (s) on 15.9.2011. After considering similar prayer, the following directions were issued by this Court :- "Accordingly, taking note of the orders passed by the Rajasthan High Court in the writ petitions and writ appeals as indicated hereinabove, all these writ petitions are allowed and disposed of with the following directions:- Respondents are directed to take steps for continuing the petitioners and for ensuring ...
Hitkarni College of Engg. and Technology, Vs. the State of Madhya Prad ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-21-2012
WP No.13427 of 2012. 21.12.2012. Sarva Shri Ravish Agrawal and Shri R.N.Singh, Sr.counsel with Shri Sankalp Kochar for the petitioneRs.Shri Jaideep Singh,Dy.GA for the respondent No.1. Shri Pradeep Sharma for respondents No.2 and 3. Shri M.K.Verma for respondent No.4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that the respondent No.4 has opened portal for submitting the examination form for the students of B.E.and B.Arch courses, so the grievance raised by the petitioners in I.A.No.16334/12 in which order was issued on 20.12.12 has been partly substantiated. I.A.No.15510/12 for issuance of an appropriate direction agaisnt respondent No.2 for permitting the petitioners for filing on-line application for extension of approval for the academic year 2013-14 : The prayer made in the application is vehemently opposed by Shri Pradeep Sharma,learned counsel appearing for respondents No.2 and 3, who submitted that at present that the petitioner are not approved institutions so the...
Lolar Prasad Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-21-2012
M.C.C.No :1393. 2012 Lolar Prasad versus State of Madhya Pradesh & OtheRs.21.12.2012. Shri Devesh Khatri for the applicant. Shri Rajesh Tiwari, Government Advocate, for the non- applicants. This application has been filed for restoration of Writ Petition No.21017/2011, which was dismissed for non- compliance of the peremptory order passed by this Court on 2.5.2012. The default is attributed to some lapse on the part of the counsel for the applicant. The application is supported by affidavit of the counsel. Considering the reason given in the applications, they are allowed. Accordingly, Writ Petition No.21017/2011 is restored to its original file. It be placed before the appropriate Bench for hearing. Application stands allowed and disposed of. Certified copy as per rules. (RAJENDRA MENON) JUDGE Aks/-...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »