Madhya Pradesh Court December 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Mst.Bainoorbi and ors Vs. Mst.Khimiyabai(D) Sheikh Sattar and ors.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-11-2012
F.A. No.58/91 -1- HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH JABALPUR SINGLE BENCH: Honble Shri Justice A.K. Shrivastava F.A. No.58/1991 APPELLANTS 1 Mst. Bainooribi (since deleted) 2. Sheikh Akbar (since dead) not by LRs:- 2-A Sheikh Sahadat 2-B Sheikh Shabbir 2-C Sheikh Shamim 2-D Sheikh Shakil 2-E Sheikh Jamil All above son of Sheikh Akbar, R/o Gram Singodi, Tahsil Amarwara, District Chhindwara (M.P.) 3. Sheikh Asraf s/o Sheikh Usman, Musalman, Occupation Tailoring 4. Sheikh Nasraf, s/o Sheikh Usman, Musalman, Occupation Readymade Cloth Shop 5. Sheikh Nazar s/o Shri Sheikh Usman, Musalman, Occupation- Kirana Shop 6. Sheikh Chhote Bhaiya, s/o Sheikh Usman, Musalman, Occupation- Readymade Cloth Shop Appellants 2 to 6 R/o Gram Singodi, Tahsil Amarwada, District Chhindwara.7. Sheikh Anwar (since dead) not by LRs:- 7.A Smt. Rabiya bi (since deleted) 7.B Shrikh Khwaja Pasha s/o Sheikh Anwar R/o Rawanwara Colliery Tahsil Parasia, District Chhindwara. Versus F.A. No.58/91 -2- RESPONDENTS 1 Mst. Khimiya...
Ramprasad Namdev Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-11-2012
W.P.No.15263 / 2012 (Ramprasad Namdeo..Vs..State of M.P.and another) 11-12-2012 Shri Deependra Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri S.M.Lal, learned G.A.for the State/respondents. The petitioner has filed this petition alleging that the wife of the petitioner is missing since 4-8-2012 but in spite of reports to the police authorities she has not been recovered. This Court, on the previous occasion, had directed the police authorities to take action in the matter. The respondents in response has stated that the police have registered a missing persons case No.8/2012 and 9/2012 at P.S.Gunnor, District Panna and have conducted the investigation therein. It is stated that the police have also examined Kallu Pandey, resident of village Paderi and Deependra Pandey, resident of village Puraini against whom allegations had been made by the petitioner but did not find out any incriminating evidence against them. The police have also made an enquiry about Hamid Musalman who has also ...
Bheemsen Sharma Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-11-2012
Bheemsen Sharma versus State 1 W.P.No.10927/2012 11.12.2012: Shri Shashank Shekhar, learned counsel for the petitioner. Smt. Sheetal Dubey, learned Panel Lawyer for the respondents No.1 to 3. Shri K.C.Ghildyal, learned counsel for respondent No.4. Shri V.K.Shukla, learned counsel for respondent No.5. Petitioner who is substantively holding the post of Revenue Sub Inspector in Nagar Parishad, Teonthar, has filed this writ petition challenging the orders Annexures P/6 and P/7 passed by the State Government transferring him to his substantive post of Revenue Sub Inspector and posting him in the neighboring District of Sidhi. Challenge to the order of transfer is made mainly on two counts. The fiRs.ground is that transfer is tainted with malafide and the same is attributed to the activities of respondent No.5, the President of Nagar Parishad, Teonthar and the second ground of challenge is that petitioner is being replaced by respondent No.4 who is substantively holding the post of Head Cle...
Hiralal Vs. Chhindwara Seoni Khet.GrA.Bank.Racnch.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-11-2012
W.P.No.9982/2006 (Hiralal and others versus Chhindwara- Seoni Kshetriya Gramin Bank) 11.12.2012 Shri Pradeep Naveriya, learned counsel for the petitioneRs.Shri Som Mishra, learned counsel for the respondent No.1. Heard. Though notices were issued to the respondents and the counsel for the respondent/Bank has entered appearance, the learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the present petition be disposed of with a direction to the Collector, Seoni and the Branch Manager, Chhindwara- Seoni Kshetriya Gramin Bank, respondent No.1 to examine the complaint of the petitioners regarding non- disbursement of the insurance amount and decide the same expeditiously, in accordance with law. The learned counsel for the respondent/Bank has no objection to the said prayer. In view of the aforesaid, the petition filed by the petitioners is disposed of with a direction to the effect that in case the petitioners file a detailed representation before the concerned Collector and respondent No.1 wi...
Avadh NaraIn Tiwari Vs. the Indian Red Cross Society
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-11-2012
W.P.No.6811/2008 (A.N.Tiwari versus the Indian Red Cross Society and otheRs.12.12.2012 Shri Atulanand Awasthy, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri S.K.Rao, learned senior counsel with Shri Shailendra Pandey, for the respondents. The learned counsel for the respondents submits that as the period for which the petitioner was appointed is over, therefore, the petition filed by the petitioner has been rendered infructuous. The aforesaid averment of the learned senior counsel for the respondents is not disputed by the learned counsel for the petitioner. In view of the aforesaid, the petition filed by the petitioner is disposed of as infructuous with liberty to the petitioner to take up further proceedings in case any cause of action survives or arises. (R.S.Jha) Judge msp...
Mangna @ Mahendra Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-11-2012
(1) Cr.A.No.2607/2005 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH: JABALPUR AFR Division Bench: Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Saksena Hon'ble Shri Justice T.K.Kaushal CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.2607/2005 Mangna @ Mahendra S/o Narayansingh Dangi, aged 23 years, R/o village Chapri,P.S.Banda, District Sagar (MP) .....Appellant -Versus- State of Madhya Pradesh through P.S.Banda,District Sagar (MP). .....Respondent ---------------------------------------------------- For the appellant : Shri V.K.Lakhera, Advocate. For the respondent: Shri Umesh Pandey,Govt.Advocate. ---------------------------------------------------- Date of hearing:04. 12/2012 Date of Judgment:11. 12/2012 ********** JUDGMENT Per: Rakesh Saksena,J.Appellant has filed this appeal against the judgment dated 11.11.2005 passed by IV Additional Sessions Judge, Sagar in Sessions Trial No.57/2003 convicting the appellant under section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and sentencing him to imprisonment for life with fine of Rs.100/-. In default of (2) Cr.A.No...
P.D. Agrawal Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-11-2012
Misc.Cr.C.No.445/07 11.12.2012 Shri SC Datt, Sr.Adv.With Shri Rahul Sharma,Adv.for the applicant. Shri Ramesh Kushwaha, P.L.for respondent/State. Heard on I.A No.21106/12 an application for taking additional documents on record. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the documents may be helpful for just and proper adjudication of the case hence they may be taken on record. The office is directed that the aforesaid documents be taken on record. Learned counsel for the applicant further submits that he has submitted some statements of witnesses in the office in the month of June 2012 but the same is not on record. Office is directed the locate the same and tagged with the file. Learned counsel for the applicant seeks some time and is granted to submit the same. Interim relief shall remain continue till next date of hearing. List in the next week. (M.A.Siddiqui) JUDGE Ag/...
Aasha Ram Trivedi Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-11-2012
W.P.No.20328/2012 (A.R.Trivedi versus State of MP and otheRs.11.12.2012 Heard Shri Dharmendra Soni, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri S.P Rai, learned P.L.for the State on advance copy on the question of admission and interim relief. The petitioner has filed this petition alleging that one Shri Jai Singh Shekhawat S/o Shri Dulhe Singh Shekhawt, R/O Rawatsar District Hanumangarh, Rajasthan has obtained a mining lease by committing forgery in the name of the petitioner and his brother and on the strength of the same is conducting illegal mining operation at Ken River in Chhatarpur District. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has filed a representation/complaint before the Superintendent of Police, Chhatarpur and the Collector, Chhatarpur but no action thereon has been taken till date, therefore, the said authorities be directed to look into the matter. Shri S.P.Rai, learned P.L.for the State on advance copy submits that the said author...
Raman Kumar Gour Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-11-2012
Shiv Kumar Mishra versus State & ORS.W.P.No.14015/2012 11/12/2012 Shri A.K.Pathak, learned counsel for the petitioneRs.Shri B.P.Pandey, learned Government Advocate for Respondent Nos.1 to 7. Shri V.K.Shukla, learned counsel for Respondent No.8. Learned counsel for the parties are heard on I.A.No.12945/2012, an application filed by the petitioner for staying an order dated 14.9.2012, Document No.1 passed by the Collector. While hearing this writ petition on the question of admission on 3.9.2012, based on the statement made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of Respondent No.8 the then Sarpanch and the material available, it was found by this Court that the petitioner's services have been terminated by resolution passed by the Gram Panchayat, which was approved by the Gram Sabha and, therefore, this Court has refused the grant stay. not Shri A.K.Pathak, learned counsel for the petitioner brought to the notice of this Court certain facts, which goes to show that the order of terminati...
Anand Soni Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-11-2012
Anand Soni versus State of Madhya Pradesh and otheRs.11.12.2012. Shri Shreyas Pandit and Shri Rahul Diwakar for the petitioner. Shri B.P.Pandey, PL, for respondent Nos.1 to 3. Shri Anshuman Singh for respondent No.4. Challenging the order-dated 31.12.2010 Annexure P/17 indicating to the petitioner the decision of the State Government in the matter of his regularization, this writ petition has been filed. Petitioner was initially appointed in the Town Improvement Trust, Damoh on 1.6.1992 after undergoing due process of selection. Subsequently, the work of Town Improvement Trust was taken over by Municipal Council, Damoh and in pursuance to the same petitioners services were also taken over by the Council. In the Municipal Council, Damoh, petitioner is designated and is working as Revenue Sub-Inspector and grievance of the petitioner is that even though he has completed long period of service, his case for regularization is not being considered. Petitioner and many other similarly situa...
- ‹ Prev
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 40
- 41
- 42
- 43
- 44
- Next ›
- Last »