Madhya Pradesh Court November 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Executive Engineer Madhya Pradesh Grah Nirman Mandal Vs. Purushhottam ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-21-2012
1 F.A.593/2012 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH JABALPUR SINGLE BENCH: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE A.K.SHRIVASTAVA F.A.No.593/2012 .........Appellant: Executive Engineer, Madhya Pradesh Grah Nirman Mandal, Project Division, Chhindwara,Through Assistant Engineer, M.P.Grah Nirman Mandal Project, Sub- Division, Seoni District Seoni, M.P.Versus .......Respondents:1. Purushottam Das Gupt, S/o Late Shri Chhimanlal Gupt (died) through heir son Rajiv Gupt, S/o Late Purushottam Das Gupt, Behind Alankar Talkies, Nagpur (Maharashtra) 2. Land Acquisition Officer, for Collector (Land Acquisition) Seoni, District Seoni, M.P.--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Appellant by - Shri Rakesh Jain, Advocate Respondents no.1 by - Shri Ravi Ranjan, Advocate Respondent no.2 by - Shri Rahul Jain, Govt. Advocate --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ORDER (21/11/2012) 1. This appeal under Section 54 of the Land Acquisiti...
Mp State Electricity Board, Vs. P.N.Verma
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-21-2012
1 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH PRINCIPAL SEAT AT JABALPUR. W.P.No.16445/2005(s) M.P.State Electricity Board. -Versus- P.N.Verma And W.P.No.3306/2006(s) P.N.Verma -Versus- M.P.State Electricity Board. PRESENT : Honble Shri Justice K.K.Trivedi. Shri Anoop Nair, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri S.K.Raghuwanshi, learned counsel for respondent. (in W.P.No.16445/2005) Shri S.K.Raghuwanshi, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri Anoop Nair, learned counsel for the respondent. (in W.P.No.3306/2006) ORDER ( .11.2012) 1: Since these two writ petitions have been filed against the order dated 22.9.2005, passed in an appeal filed by the respondent/ employee by the Industrial Court partially allowing the appeal and setting aside the order of the Labour Court, both the writ petitions 2 were heard together and are being decided by this common order. However, for the purposes of this order, the facts are taken from W.P.No.16445/2005(s).2: These petitions under Article 227 of the Constitution ...
Sant Ram Gupta Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-21-2012
sant ram gupta versus state 1 W.P.No.19550/2012 21/11/2012 Shri V.D.S. Chouhan, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri Sanjeev Kumar Singh, learned Panel Lawyer for the respondents on advance notice. Petitioner is working as a Stenographer Grade III and has filed this writ petition challenging a show cause notice dated 9.11.2012. A show cause notice has been issued to the petitioner asking him to indicate as to why the promotion granted to him earlier should not be cancelled. It seems that a show cause notice was earlier issued to the petitioner on 5.8.2011 and various correspondence have taken place between the parties and petitioner has sought for various documents. not vide Annexure P/9 dated 9.11.2012 respondents have indicated that all the documents available have been supplied to the petitioner, inspite thereof, he is delaying the matter and not submitted his reply to show cause notice and therefore, final warning is given to him to file reply to the show cause notice failing w...
Executive Engineer Madhya Pradesh Grah Nirman Mandal Vs. Rajendra Gupt ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-21-2012
1 F.A.597/2012 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH JABALPUR SINGLE BENCH: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE A.K.SHRIVASTAVA F.A.No.597/2012 .........Appellant: Executive Engineer, Madhya Pradesh Grah Nirman Mandal, Project Division, Chhindwara,Through Assistant Engineer, M.P.Grah Nirman Mandal Project, Sub- Division, Seoni District Seoni, M.P.Versus .......Respondents:1. Rajendra Gupt, S/o Late Shri Narayandas J.Gupt, Occupation Advocate/Agriculturist, R/o Kachahri Chowk, Seoni, District Seoni 2. Land Acquisition Officer, for Collector (Land Acquisition) Seoni, District Seoni, M.P.--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Appellant by - Shri Rakesh Jain, Advocate Respondents no.1 by - Shri Ravi Ranjan, Advocate Respondent no.2 by - Shri Rahul Jain, Govt. Advocate --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ORDER (21/11/2012) 1. This appeal under Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 has been filed on behalf o...
Leela Bai Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-21-2012
Leela Bai versus State of Madhya Pradesh and four otheRs.21.11.2012. Shri D.K.Pandey for the petitioner. Shri Sanjeev Kumar Singh, Panel Lawyer, for the State. Claim of the petitioner for grant of compassionate appointment is pending consideration before respondent No.4 the District Education Officer. Keeping in view the aforesaid, respondent No.4 the District Education Officer, Mandla is directed to consider and decide the claim of the petitioner for grant of compassionate appointment in accordance to the policies and circulars applicable within a period of three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. With the aforesaid, the petition stands disposed of. Certified copy as per rules. (RAJENDRA MENON) JUDGE Aks/-...
Executive Engineer Madhya Pradesh Grah Nirman Mandal Vs. Smt. Suryakan ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-21-2012
1 F.A.588/2012 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH JABALPUR SINGLE BENCH: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE A.K.SHRIVASTAVA F.A.No.588/2012 .........Appellant: Executive Engineer, Madhya Pradesh Grah Nirman Mandal, Project Division, Chhindwara,Through Assistant Engineer, M.P.Grah Nirman Mandal Project, Sub- Division, Seoni District Seoni, M.P.Versus .......Respondents:1. Smt. Suryakanta Devi W/o Premnarayan (deceased) Through nephew Rajiv Gupta, S/o Late Purushottam Das Gupta, Behind Alankar Talkies, Nagpur (Maharashtra) 2. Land Acquisition Officer, for Collector (Land Acquisition) Seoni, District Seoni, M.P.--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Appellant by - Shri Rakesh Jain, Advocate Respondents no.1 by - Shri Ravi Ranjan, Advocate Respondent no.2 by - Shri Rahul Jain, Govt. Advocate --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ORDER (21/11/2012) 1. This appeal under Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 189...
Bherav Prasad Vishwakarma Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-21-2012
W.P.No.19320 / 2012 (Bherav Pd. Vishwakarma ...Vs...State of MP and otheRs.21-11-2012 Shri Subhash Tamrakar, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri S.S.Bisen, learned G.A.for the State/respondents. Heard on the question of admission. Though the petitioner has raised several issues in the petition, it is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that as the petitioner has raised several issues before the Collector, Narsinghpur by filing a representation, the petition be disposed of with a direction to the Collector, Narsinghpur to consider his grievance. It is submitted that although the petitioner has been nominated as the President of Self Help Group attached to the Government Silk Centre, Rehma, Tahsil Gadarwara, District Narsinghpur, he is neither being given charge not is he being involved in the activities by the Field Officer (Silk).Rehma and, therefore, the Collector, Narsinghpur be directed to look into the petitioner's grievance. Learned Govt. Advocate, appearing f...
Smt. Nisha Singh Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-21-2012
W.A.No.1157/2012 21.11.2012 Shri R.B.Singh, Advocate for the appellant. Shri Jaideep Singh, Dy. Govt. Advocate for respondents-State. Shri Luvkush Mishra, Advocate for respondent no.6. This appeal is directed against an ad-interim order dated 24/9/12 passed in W .P.No.12857/12 by which learned Single Judge permitted Smt. Asha Mishra to join on the post of Anganbadi worker treating that she was more meritorious in comparison to Smt. Nisha Singh. Learned counsel for the appellant submitted that he caused appearance on 24.9.12 and sought time to file reply. Appellant Nisha Singh had already joined the duty on 22/3/10 and she was working on the post on 24.9.12, i.e.the date of the order. The main relief in the writ petition was that Asha Mishra may be permitted to join the duty. Learned Single Judge by the impugned order directed joining of Asha Mishra treating her more meritorious than Smt. Nisha Singh, at interim stage. The effect of the order-dated 24/9/12 is that appellant Nisha Singh ...
Executive Engineer Madhya Pradesh Grah Nirman Mandal Vs. Smt. Ramadevi
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-21-2012
1 F.A.602/2012 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH JABALPUR SINGLE BENCH: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE A.K.SHRIVASTAVA F.A.No.602/2012 .........Appellant: Executive Engineer, Madhya Pradesh Grah Nirman Mandal, Project Division, Chhindwara,Through Assistant Engineer, M.P.Grah Nirman Mandal Project, Sub- Division, Seoni District Seoni, M.P.Versus .......Respondents:1. Smt. Ramadevi, W/o Shri Devendra Kumar Gupta, R/o South Civil Lines, Jabalpur, Through Power of Attorney Holder Shri Rajendra Gupt, S/o Late Shri Narayandas J.Gupt, Occupation Advocate/Agriculturist, R/o Kachahri Chowk, Seoni, District Seoni 2. Land Acquisition Officer, for Collector (Land Acquisition) Seoni, District Seoni, M.P.--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Appellant by - Shri Rakesh Jain, Advocate Respondents no.1 by - Shri Ravi Ranjan, Advocate Respondent no.2 by - Shri Rahul Jain, Govt. Advocate ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------...
Shyamlal Dahayat Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-21-2012
W.P.NO.18166/12 21-11-2012. Shri S.K.Patel, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri Rajesh Tiwari, learned Govt. Advocate, on advance notice for the respondents. Challenging the order Annexure P-8 dated 18-07-2012 passed by the Collector, postponing the decision to be taken with regard to regularization of the petitioner, this writ petition has been filed. The petitioner is working as a Headmaster and in accordance to the Scheme formulated by the State Government, he was to carry out certain work under the Scheme pertaining to distribution of uniforms and cycles to the students of the school in question. On the ground that in the distribution of the uniforms and cycles, the petitioner has committed some irregularity, he was placed under suspension vide order dated 30-12-2011 (Annexure P-1).Thereafter, it seems from the material available on record t that certain inquiry was conducted and on the basis of the material that came in the inquiry, it was found that no case for proceeding fu...
- ‹ Prev
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 34
- Next ›
- Last »