Madhya Pradesh Court November 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Khumanpuri and ors. Vs. Deoshankerji Mandir and ors.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-22-2012
(1) F.A. No.163/1996 HIGH COURT OF M. P. JUDICATURE AT JABALPUR Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Justice A.K. Shrivastava First Appeal No.163 / 1996 Appellants 1, Khumanpuri S/o. Prempuri Gosai, R/o. Village Pagara, Tehsil and District Sagar.2. Lakhanlal, S/o. Dargailal Kesarwani, R/o. Parkota Ward, Sagar Vs. Respondents:1. Shri Deoshankerji Mandir Trust Maharashi Dayanand Ward, Sagar through its Trustee Rameshwar Prasad, S/o. Ramsahay Pateria, Lajpatpura Ward, Sagar.2. Jhalkanpuri, S/o. Mangalpuri, R/o. Village Pagara, Tehsil & District Sagar.3. Dinanath (deleted) 4. Prakashchand S/o. Mukandilal Jain, R/o. Maharshi Dayanand Ward, Sagar ______________________________________________ Shri T.S. Ruprah, Senior Advocate with Shri Prabhat Shukla, Advocate or appellants. Shri B.P. Yadav, Advocate for respondents. ______________________________________________ Date of hearing :11. 09.2012 Date of judgment : /11/2012 JUDGMENT (Delivered on this day of November, 2012) (2) F.A. No.163/1996 Feeling ag...
Bhanu Shankar Raikwar Vs. Vijay Shankar Raikwar
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-22-2012
1 M.A. 4455/2011 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH JABALPUR SINGLE BENCH: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE A.K. SHRIVASTAVA M.A. No.4455/2011 .........Appellants:1. Bhanu Shankar Raikwar, S/o Late Damrilal, Occupation- Service 2. Vinot Shankar Raikwar, S/o Damrilal, Both residents of House No.274, Karamchand Chowk, Ram-Manohar Lohiya Ward, Jabalpur Versus .......Respondents:1. Vijay Shankar Raikwar, S/o Late Damrilal, Ram-Manohar Lohiya Ward, Jabalpur 2. Ravishankar, S/o Late Damrilal Raikwar, Occupation Service, R/o 1806-B, Type I, Sector 2, Vehicle Estate, Jabalpur. 3 Smt. Madhubala, wife of Jeevanlal Agarwal, Resident of Gautamjiki Madhiya, Garha, Jabalpur. 4.. Anju Yadav, W/o Shri Sanjay Yadav, R/o 290, Karamchand Chowk, Jabalpur, --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Appellants by - Shri A.K. Jain, Advocate Respondent no.1 by - Shri R.P. Khare, Advocate Respondent no.4 by - Shri Abhishek Arjariya, Advocate ------------------------------------------...
M.P. Housingh Board Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-22-2012
W.A.No.495/2012 22.11.2012 None for the appellants. Shri A.P.Singh, Advocate for respondent No.2. It is submitted by Shri Singh that the order passed by the Single Bench has been given effect to, so this appeal has become infructuous. It is further submitted that taking advantage of the interim order passed by this Court, the appellants herein are trying to dispossess the respondent No.2. As the counsel of the appellants is not present today, we adjourn hearing of this appeal for 12.12.2012. Till next date of hearing, it is directed that the status quo, as on today, in respect of factual position on the spot be maintained by both the parties. C.C.today. (Krishn Kumar Lahoti) (Smt. Vimla Jain) Judge Judge psm...
Rohit @ Mahipal Singh Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-22-2012
HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH JABALPUR Criminal Appeal No.1605/2012 Rohit @ Mahipal Singh Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Present : Hon'ble Shri Justice N.K. Gupta. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name of counsel for the parties: Shri Dinesh Upadhyay, counsel for the appellant. Shri Ajay Tamrakar, Panel Lawyer the respondent/State. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- JUDGMENT (Delivered on 22nd day of November, 2012) The appellant has preferred this appeal against the judgment dated 19.7.2012 passed by the 4th Additional Sessions Judge, Tikamgarh in S.T. No.62/11, whereby the appellant was convicted for the offence punishable under Section 392 of IPC and sentenced for five years R.I. with fine of `1,000/- and in default of payment of fine, three months R.I. was directed.2. The prosecutions stor...
Mahendra Singh and ors Vs. the State of M.P.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-22-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH, JABALPUR SINGLE BENCH : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE N.K.GUPTA, J.Criminal Appeal No.2633/1997 Mahendra Singh & another VERSUS State of Madhya Pradesh --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Shri Narendra Nikhare, counsel for the appellant. Shri G.S.Thakur, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondent. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- JUDGMENT (Delivered on the 22nd day of November, 2012) The appellants have preferred this appeal against the judgment dated 9.12.1997 passed by the learned 6th Additional Sessions Judge, Jabalpur in S.T.No.368/1994, whereby the appellant No.1 was convicted for the offence punishable under section 326 of IPC and the appellant No.2 was convicted for the offence punishable under section 326 read with section 34 of IPC. Both the appellants were sentenced for 3 years' rigorous imprisonment with fine of Rs.1,000/- each for the aforesaid crime and 2 months' additio...
Dinendra Kumar Chouhan Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-22-2012
Writ Appeal No.1184 o22. 11/2012 Shri Dr. Anuvad Shrivastava, Advocate for the appellant. Shri Vivek Agrawal, Government Advocate for State. This appeal is directed against an order dated 03/09/2012 passed by the Single Bench in Writ Petition No.1878/2012, by which writ petition preferred by the appellant challenging the correctness of the answers of the questions which were asked from the petitioner for the selection on the post of ADPO by Madhya Pradesh Public Service Commission, was dismissed. Learned counsel appearing for the appellant submitted that the model answers were incorrect. That Mayank Bharadwaj judgment which has been relied on by the Single Bench does not fully apply in the present case. All the answers of the questions which were under challenge in the present petition were not before the Gwalior Bench in Mayank Bharadwarj, so, the learned Single Judge erred in dismissing the petition. Stating aforesaid, it was submitted the learned counsel for the appellant that the a...
Smt. Shambha Bai JaIn Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-22-2012
W.A.No.993/2012 22.11.2012 Shri Sanjay K. Agrawal, Advocate for the appellant. Shri Vijay Pandey, Dy. Advocate General for the respondents. It is submitted by the learned counsel appearing for the appellant that as per circular Annexure R-1 dated 2.3.2000 the appellant is entitled for pension. By the aforesaid circular, an employee, who was in pensionable service, but died before coming into force of Family Pension Scheme, 1966, without completion of required period of pension, is not entitled for pension. On raising such contention, learned counsel for the State prays a short time to seek instructions from the Finance Department in respect of entitlement of the appellant for pension. For this purpose, we adjourn hearing of this appeal for 12.12.2012. A typed copy of this order be supplied to Shri Vijay Pandey, learned counsel for the State for necessary action. (Krishn Kumar Lahoti) (Smt. Vimla Jain) Judge Judge psm...
Vidya Mandir Samiti Shala and anr. Vs. the State of M.P. and ors.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-22-2012
1 W.P.No.6081/2005 Vidya Mandir Samiti & Anot versus State of M.P.& ORS.22.11.2012 Shri Pranay Verma and Shri Abhishek Singh learned counsel for the petitioneRs.Shri S.S.Bisen learned Govt. Advocate for respondent/State. Though the petitioner has filed this petition being aggrieved by order dated 23.6.2005 whereby the respondent authorities had directed to shift Government Primary School Hanauta Dugah, Block Rahatgarh to the premises of the petitioneRs.school run by the petitioner society at village Ghaurat presuming that the petitioneRs.school had stopped functioning on retirement of two Gurujis whose salary was being sanctioned by the Government, it is submitted by the learned Govt. Advocate for the respondent/State that subsequently the respondent authorities, on realizing the mistake that the petitioneRs.school was infact functioning and they had appointed three Gurujis from their own resources, have modified the impugned order dated 23.6.2005 by the subsequent order dated 7.8.2006...
Dr.S.S.Nafde Vs. the State of M.P. and ors.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-22-2012
1 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH PRINCIPAL SEAT AT JABALPUR. W.P.No.1178/2004 Dr. S.S. Nafde. -Versus- State of M.P. and others. PRESENT : Honble Shri Justice K.K. Trivedi. Shri Avinash Zargar and Shri Girish Prakash Kekre, Advocate, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri Samdarshi Tiwari, learned Govt. Advocate for the respondents. ORDER ( .11.2012) By this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has called in question the action of respondents of recovering certain amount from the retiral dues of the petitioner, as is indicated in the Pension Payment Order dated 28.2.2001. It is contended that the petitioner was serving on the post of Deputy Chief Medical Officer at Kurai, District Seoni, when he gave a notice for his voluntary retirement. The said notice was not acted upon on first occasion, therefore, a repeated request was made on 1.9.1999, categorically indicating in the notice that the petitioner would retire from service on 30.11.1999. However, t...
Nagar Palika Parishad Seoni Malwa Vs. State of M.P. and ors.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-22-2012
F.A. 100/1996 1 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH JABALPUR SINGLE BENCH: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE A.K. SHRIVASTAVA F.A. No.100/1996 .........Appellant: Nagar Palika Parishad Seoni-Malwa District Hoshangabad through the Chief Municipal Officer, Seoni-Malwa Versus .......Respondents:1. State of M.P. through:- (i) The Secretary, Education Department, Govt. of M.P. Mantralaya, Bhopal, (M.P.) (ii) The Collector, Hoshangabad 2. Joint Director Education, Narmada Division, Hoshangabad 3. Head Master, Govt. Girls Middle School, Seoni-Malwa, District Hoshangabad 4. Principal, Govt. Naveen High School, Seoni- Malwa,District Hoshangabad --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Appellant by - Shri D.K. Dixit, Advocate Respondents by - Shri Akhilesh Shukla, Dy. Govt. Advocate. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Date of hearing:23. 08/2012 Date of Judgment: /11/2012 JUDGMENT ( /11/2012) F.A. 100/1996 2 Feeling ...
- ‹ Prev
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- Next ›
- Last »