Madhya Pradesh Court October 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Tularam Chadar Vs. Union of India
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-09-2012
HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADEESH JABALPUR (Writ Petition No.12855/2009) Tularam Chadhar Vs. Union of India and others PRESENT : HONOURABLE SHRI JUSTICE AJIT SINGH HONOURABLE SHRI JUSTICE SANJAY YADAV Counsel for petitioner Shri, S. Chakravarty, Advocate Counsel for Respondents Shri, S.A. Dharmadhikari, Advocate O R D E R (9/10/2012) The following order of the Court was delivered by Sanjay Yadav, J : This petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is directed against order dated 26.5.2009, passed by Central Administrative Tribunal, Jabalpur Bench, Jabalpur; whereby Original Application Nos. 829 and 834 of 2007 have been dismissed.2. Vide Original Application petitioner sought quashment of communication dated 12.9.2007 and a direction to respondents to promote petitioner as Highly Skilled Tool Maker w.e.f. 1.1.1996 and for grant of difference of salary.3. Uncontroverted facts briefly are th...
Gram Panchayat Dawaldi Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-09-2012
W.P.No.15595 o09. 10.12 Shri T.S.Ruprah, Senior Advocate assisted by Shri Harmeet Singh Ruprah, counsel for the petitioner. Smt Sheetal Dubey, GA for respondents No.1 to 3. The petitioner/Gram Panchayat has filed this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuing the appropriate writ in the nature of mandamus directing the authorities of the respondents not to interfere with the possession of the land of Cultivators and Bhumi Swamis the residents of village Dewaldi the area of the petitioner/panchayat. In the CouRs.of the argument on asking the petitioner's counsel whether any property of the Gram Panchayat is also involved in the subject matter of this petition, on which, he fairly submits that no such property of the Panchayat is involved in the matter, then on asking the petitioner's counsel whether under the provisions of the Gram Panchayat Avem Gram Swaraj Adhiniyam the petitioner/panchayat is empowered or having the authority to file the impugned petition on...
indrajeet Vs. the State of M.P.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-09-2012
HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH, PRINCIPAL SEAT, JABALPUR SINGLE BENCH PRESENT: HON'BLE JUSTICE SHRI N. K. GUPTA CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1482/1998 Indrajeet Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh ........................................................................................................... For the appellant : Shri S. K. Gangrade, Advocate. For the respondent: Shri Punit Shroti, Panel Lawyer ........................................................................................................... JUDGMENT (Delivered on the 9th day of October, 2012) The appellant has preferred this appeal against the judgment dated 29.6.1998 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Beohari, District Shahdol in ST. No.142/1996 whereby the appellant was convicted for offence punishable under Section 376(1) of I.P.C and sentenced for 7 years rigorous imprisonment with fine of Rs.2000/- and in default of payment of fine, six months simple imprisonment in addition.2. The prosecution's case in short is that on 9.6....
Rajendra Kumar Gupta Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-09-2012
W.P.No.16815 o09. 10.12 Shri Anil Dwivedi, counsel for the petitioner. He is heard on the question of admission. The petitioner has filed this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuing the writ in the nature of certiorari for quashment of the entire recovery proceedings of the sum carried out by the respondent/bank against the petitioner with respect of some housing loan. In additional to it, the prayer for taking the appropriate action against the recovery officer of respondent No.2 is also made. In the couRs.of the arguments on admission, on asking the petitioner's counsel regarding maintainability of this petition before this court, on which, he made his limited submission that this petition be disposed of with appropriate direction to the respondent/bank to consider representation of the petitioner Annex.P/5 which was made to the authorities of respondents No.2 to 4 in the shape of legal notice dated 17.7.12 through the counsel Shri Vinot Kumar Prajapati i...
Union of India Vs. Shiv Charan Choudhary
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-09-2012
HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH : AT JABALPUR Writ Petition No :2701. of 2006(S) Union of India and Others - V/s - Smt. Sharda Bai and others Present : Honble Shri Justice Rajendra Menon. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Shri O.P.Namdeo, counsel for the petitioneRs.Shri Subodh Kathar, counsel for the respondents. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Whether approved for reporting: Yes / No.ORDER 09/10/2012 Challenging an award dated 1.8.2006 Annexure P/12, passed by the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Jabalpur in Case not CGIT/L.C/R/219/91, answering the reference in favour of the Workman concerned, this writ petition has been filed by the petitioners/management. 2- Respondents herein are the Legal Heirs of deceased workman Shri Shiv Charan Choudhary, who was working as a Postal Assistant in the office of Senior Superintendent of Post Office, Sagar. It seems th...
Rama Devi Vs. Smt. Kari Bai
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-09-2012
Writ Petition No.7233/12(O) 9.10.2012 Shri P.S.Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioner. Having heard on the question of admission, it is directed that on payment of P.F.along with requisite of the registered post within three working days, the notice against admission as well as of I.A.No.6290/12, an application for grant of stay against further proceedings of the trial Court, returnable by fixing a date in the month of December 2012, be issued to the respondents failing which, this petition shall stand dismissed automatically without further reference to the Bench. As an interim measure till next hearing of this petition, the further proceedings of Civil Original Suit No.30-A of 2011, pending in the Court of IInd Civil Judge Class-I Balaghat, is hereby stayed. Certified copy as per rules. (U.C.Maheshwari) Judge Pb...
Ayodhya Prasad Brahman Vs. Janak Dulari (Dead) Smt. Chitra Shukla
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-09-2012
W.P.No.15582 o09. 10.12 Shri Devendra Shukla, counsel for the petitioner. Heard on the question of admission. The petitioner/plaintiff has filed this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India being aggrieved by the order dated 23.8.12 passed by ADJ.Amarpatan in MCA No.30/12 affirming the order dated 29.8.11 passed by Civil Judge Class I, Amarpatan in MJ.No.2/10 whereby his application filed under order 9 rule 4/9 of the CPC for restoration of Co.No.10-A/97 which was dismissed in default of appearance and PF, has been dismissed. Initially, the case was argued at length for admission and allowing this petition for restoration of Co.No.10-A/97 but in the available circumstances of the matter according to which after filing the aforesaid Co.No.10-A/97, the same was dismissed on 28.10.2005 due to non-appearance of the petitioner's counsel so also not payment of PF in compliance of the direction of the court. Subsequent to such dismissal, on behalf of the petitioner an applicat...
Satyanarayan Somani Vs. Municipal Council, Harda Th: C.M.O.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-09-2012
1 W.P No.3544/2002 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR WRIT PETITION NO.3544/2002 PETITIONER : SATYANARAYAN SOMANI Vs. RESPONDENT : MUNICIPAL COUNCIL, HARDA -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For the petitioner : Shri Shreyas Pandit, Advocate. For the respondent : Shri V. K. Shukla, Advocate Present : Hon'ble Shri Justice R.S. Jha. ORDER (09/10/2012) The petitioner has filed this petition being aggrieved by demand notice dated 29.9.2000 and the order dated 12.4.2002 rejecting the petitioner's application submitted in compliance of the order passed by this Court in W.P No.6093/2000.2. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner had purchased a HIG House No.7 in the Housing Scheme floated by the Special Area Development Authority, Harda in the year 1986 which has not been converted into Municipal Council, Harda. It is submitted that the initial notified price of the house was Rs.1,50,000/- but it w...
Shri Satya Sai Nagrik Sahkari Bank Maryadit Vs. Reserve Bank of India
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-09-2012
W.P.No.12864 o9. 10.2012 Shri A.M.Mathur, learned Sr.Adv assisted by Shri Amalpushpa Shroti, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri S.A.Dharmadhikari, learned counsel for the respondents. At the request of the counsel present, this case is taken out of its turn from the list of motion hearing cases. Although this case is listed for final disposal in compliance of the earlier order dated 28.9.2012 but in view of long list of motion hearing cases, it is not possible to take this matter for final disposal today, hence the case is adjourned. At this stage learned Senior Advocate prayed to hear on IA No.13150/12, petitioner's application for amendment in the writ petition. The other side did not have any objection in allowing such application and permitting the petitioner to amend the petition. Accordingly in view of the aforesaid by allowing the IA the Assisting Counsel for the petitioner is directed to carry out the necessary correction in the writ petition within three working days. no...
Ashok Pandey Vs. the State of M.P. and ors.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-09-2012
1 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR Writ Petition No :1831. OF 200.Ashok Pandey V/s State of M.P. & Ors. Present : Honble Shri Justice Rajendra Menon. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Shri Ashish Pathak, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri S.S. Bisen, learned Government Advocate for respondents/State. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ORDER 9.10.2012 Challenging the order Annexure P-1 dated 2.7.2002 passed by the Disciplinary Authority dismissing the petitioner from service, order of the Appellate Authority Annexure P-2 dated 10.10.2002 and the order of Mercy Appeal Annexure P-3 dated 3.4.2003, petitioner has filed this writ petition.2. Petitioner was working as a Constable and was posted in Police Station Waidhan, District Sidhi. In the year 2000 when the cause of action for taking disciplinary action against the petitioner took place on 24.11.2000 pet...
- ‹ Prev
- 56
- 57
- 58
- 59
- 60
- 62
- 63
- 64
- 65
- 66
- Next ›
- Last »