Madhya Pradesh Court October 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Radheshyam Kushwaha Vs. Babiya
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-19-2012
1 M.A. 2973/2005 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH JABALPUR SINGLE BENCH: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE A.K. SHRIVASTAVA M.A. No.2973/2005 Appellants:1. Radheshyam Kushwaha, S/o Sukhai Prasad Kushwaha, R/o Village Naro, P.S. Majhauli, District Sidhi (M.P.) 2. Rajendra Prasad @ Ramlakhan S/o Tajai Kushwaha, Occupation-Driver, R/o Village Dhuadol, P.S. Majhauli, District Sidhi (M.P.) Versus Respondents 1. Babiya, w/o Budhsen Prajapati, 2. Indrapal, S/o Budhsen Prajapati 3. Shriman Prajapati S/o Budhsen Prajapati 4. Keshkali, D/o Budhsen Prajapati 5. Lalbhai D/o Budhsen Prajapati 6. Ku. Rani Prajapati D/o Budhsen Prajapati 7. Mamta D/o Budhsen Prajapati 8. Chandramani, S/o Budhsen Prajapati Respondents No.2 to 8 are minors through their natural mother guardian Babiya All residents of Village Ghijwar, Tahsil Majhouli, District Sidhi (M.P.) 9. The New India Insurance Co. Ltd. Branch Office, Galla Mandi Road, Rewa (M.P.) 2 M.A. 2973/2005 --------------------------------------------------------------------...
Ramanuj Tiwari Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-19-2012
Writ Petition No.17672/12. 19.10.2012 Shri A.P.Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner. Smt. Sheetal Dubey, learned Govt. Adv.for the State-respondents no.1 to 3. Heard on the question of admission. The petitioner has filed this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuing the appropriate writ in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondents No.2 & 3 to decide the representation of the petitioner against illegal and unauthorized working of respondent no.3 as Returning Officer in the impugned election of Prathmik Laghu Van Upaj Sahkari Samiti Maryadit, Gorvani, Tahsil Sarai District Singrauli. In addition to it, the prayer for appropriate direction to the respondents no.2 & 3 to take strict disciplinary action against the respondent no.4 for disobeying the order dated 26.9.2012 (Annexure-P-4) issued by the respondent no.2 whereby, the respondent no.4 was changed from the post of Returning Officer for conducting the election of petitioners Society, is made. I...
Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Shri Lal
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-19-2012
1 M.A. No. 5116/2010 19.10.2012 Shri Gulab Shane, learned counsel for the appellant. Shri Arun Nema, learned Counsel for respondents. Heard. Aggrieved by Award dated 30.8.2010 passed by Second Additional Member to Fifth Additional Motor Accident Tribunal (Fast Track Court) Chhindwara in M.V.C No. 51/2009, appellant Insurance Company has filed this appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicle Act, 1988 (hereafter referred as Act, 1988).Claim under Section 166 of Act, 1988 for compensation emanated from accident which occurred on 28.5.2006 when one Dumper bearing registration No. MP 04K1137 turned turtle resulting in death of Bhagwatibai, Vijai, Aslal alias Asharam, Ramkar and Basantibai and grievous injury to Ramavtar, a pillion rider of Motor Cycle got embroiled with the offending vehicle. The Claims Tribunal after appreciating the entire evidence on record came to hold that the offending vehicle being driven ra...
Rameshwar Yadav Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-19-2012
Cr. Appeal No.2780/11. 19.10.2012 Shri Prakash Gupta, learned counsel for the appellant. Shri S.K.Shrivastava, learned P.L.for the State/respondent. Heard on I.A.No.13358/12, a repeat application on behalf of appellant for suspension of remaining jail sentence and grant of bail. As his earlier application in this regard was dismissed as withdrawn vide order dated 12.1.2012, by extending a liberty to revive the prayer after six months and this application has been preferred under such liberty. The appellant has been convicted and sentenced under Section 307 of I.P.C., RI for five years with fine of Rs.2000/- and he has suffered the judicial custody for 95 days, as appeared from the record of the trial Court. Besides this, he has already suffered the jail from 10.11.2011 i.e.from the date of impugned judgment till today. Having heard, perused the record along with the impugned judgment, in the available circumstances, taking into consideration the aforesaid period suffered by the appella...
In Reference Vs. Shri Vijay Singh Thakur
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-19-2012
Con.Cr.No.3/2011 19.10.2012 Shri Vijay Pandey, Dy.A.G., for State. Shri Hitendra Singh, counsel for contemneRs.I.A.No.18292/2011. Shri Hitendra Singh submits that he has moved this application for withdrawal of Vakalatnama. It is also intimated by him that contemners have engaged Sarvashri D.K.Tripath and D.K.Patel, as counsel in the matter. In view of aforesaid, we permit Sarvashri Mrigendra Singh and Hitendra Singh to withdraw their Vakalatnama. I.A.No.18292/2011 is allowed. Shri D.K.Patel, counsel present in the Court submitted that he has filed Vakalatnma in the office, but office has not listed Vakalatnama along with the case because earlier an Advocate was engaged. In view of aforesaid, we permit Sarvashri D.K.Tripathi and D.K.Patel to file Vakalatnama. Office to accept aforesaid Vakalatnama. Office to reflect name of Sarvashri D.K.Tripathi and D.K.Patel in the cause list on the next date of hearing. It is brought to our notice that this case was listed for hearing on 17.10.2012,...
indrajeet Sharma Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-19-2012
Cr.A.No.200/2010 19.10.2012 None for the appellant. Smt. Sheetal Dubey, learned Govt. Adv for the respondent- State. Shri D.K.Pandey, learned counsel for the applicant Praveen Kumar Shukla, the earlier surety of the appellant of the matter on whose behalf IA No.21748/12 has been filed. Heard on IA No.21748/12, this is an application filed on behalf of said Praveen Kumar Shukla, the earlier surety of the appellant for modification of the order dated 4.1.2012. Having perused the orders dated 24.2.2010 and 7.2.2011 whereby suspending the remaining jail sentence of the appellant, he was directed to be released on bail. In the available scenario in the order sheet dated 4.1.2012 in the sixth line of para 1 dated 24.2.2010 is hereby replaced by 7.2.2011. Office is directed to correct accordingly and it be read accordingly. Pursuant to it, office is also directed to inform the trial court to recover the sum of the surety who furnished the surety on behalf of the appellant in compliance of th...
Shri Guru Harikishasn College of Education Run by Shri Guru Harikishan ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-19-2012
WP No.15130 of 2012. 19.10.2012. Shri Praveen Chourasia for the petitioner. Shri P.K.Kaurav for respondents No.1 and 2. Shri K.K.Singh for respondent No.4. Shri Mahendra Pateria for respondent No.1. A preliminary objection is raised by Shri Kaurav that this matter relates to Ratlam which falls within the territorial jurisdiction of Indore Bench of this Court, so this petition may not be entertained. On raising such objection,learned counsel for the petitioner seeks withdrawal of this petition with liberty to file a fresh petition before the Indore Bench of this Court. Prayer is allowed. This petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed. (Krishn Kumar Lahoti) (Smt.Vimla Jain) Judge Judge Khan*...
Akhilesh Choubey Vs. National Highway Authority of India
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-19-2012
W.P.No.6333/2012 (Akhilesh Choubey and others versus National Highway Authority of India and another) 19.10.2012 Shri V. Bide, learned counsel for the petitioneRs.Shri Mohan Sousarkar, learned counsel for the respondent No.1. On instructions, the learned counsel for the respondent/National Highway has produced the map and stated that no alternative government land is available in the area to fulfill the requirement of the toll plaza. It is submitted that .07 hectare of land in khaSr.No.243 belonging to the government is available which is not sufficient for constructing the toll plaza. It is submitted that the land for constructing the toll plaza from the petitioners and other person has already been acquired and in such circumstances after taking all aspects into consideration, the relief sought for by the petitioners for shifting the toll plaza is practically not possible as it is based on incorrect statement regarding availability of the government land. In view of the aforesaid fac...
Kishan Lal Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-19-2012
1 W.P.No.16390 o19. 10.2012 Shri Rakesh Pandey, counsel for the petitioner. Smt Sheetal Dubey, GA for the respondent/State. Heard on the question of admission. The petitioner has filed this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, being aggrieved by the order dated 9.3.12 (Annex.P/1) passed by the respondent No.3/Appellate authority And Forest Conservator Seoni, Circle Seoni whereby his appeal filed against the order dated 27.2.2010 passed by the authorized officer/ respondent No.4 confiscating his vehicle, has been dismissed. Pursuant to it, the order of the competent authority has been affirmed. In the couRs.of the arguments on asking the petitioner's counsel that under the provision, the impugned order is made revisable and why instead to file the revision he has come to this court with this petition, on which, he seeks permission to withdraw this petition with liberty to fie the criminal revision before the competent Sessions Court against the impugned order with a ...
Oriental Insurance Co.Ltd. Vs. Bhagwan Das
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-19-2012
1 M.A. No. 5114/2010 19.10.2012 Shri Gulab Shane, learned counsel for the appellant. Shri Arun Nema, learned Counsel for respondents. Heard. Aggrieved by Award dated 30.8.2010 passed by Second Additional Member to Fifth Additional Motor Accident Tribunal (Fast Track Court) Chhindwara in M.V.C No. 38/2009, appellant Insurance Company has filed this appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicle Act, 1988 (hereafter referred as Act, 1988).Claim under Section 166 of Act, 1988 for compensation emanated from accident which occurred on 28.5.2006 when one Dumper bearing registration No. MP 04K1137 turned turtle resulting in death of Bhagwatibai, Vijai, Aslal alias Asharam, Ramkar and Basantibai and grievous injury to Ramavtar, a pillion rider of Motor Cycle got embroiled with the offending vehicle. The Claims Tribunal after appreciating the entire evidence on record came to hold that the offending vehicle being driven ra...
- ‹ Prev
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
- Next ›
- Last »