Madhya Pradesh Court October 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Pradeep Kumar Singh (Since Deceased) Through His Legal Representatives ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-01-2012
1 MCC. No.1122/2012 MCC. NO.1122/2012 01.10.2012 Shri B.K.Upadhyaya, learned counsel for the applicants.I.A. No.11136/2012, is an application for permission to bring legal representatives of applicant No.1 on record. It is stated therein that, applicant No.1 Pradeep Singh died on 03.08.12, which has necessitated filing an application for bringing his legal representatives on record. Considered. Allowed. The applicants since has already impleaded legal representatives of applicant no.1 in the cause title, no further correction is warranted. Present MCC is an application for extension of time to comply with order dated 06.07.11 passed in MCC No.822/2011, which in turn was an application for restoration of M.A.No.1400/2011 which stood dismissed for non-compliance of peremptory order dated 8.4.2011.M.A. No.1400/2011 was at the instance of owner and driver of offending vehicle and was directed against the award in favour of respondents no.1 to 5. The restoration application M.C.C.No.822/201...
Satish Narayan Datar Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-01-2012
Satish Narayan Datar versus State of M.P.& Anr. Writ Petition No.16363 / 2012 (s) 1.10.2012: Shri Praveen Verma, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri S.S. Bisen, learned Government Advocate for the State, on advance notice. This is second round of litigation by the petitioner. Petitioner is working as Head Master in Government Middle School Karhipawal, Suhawal in District Satna. By the impugned order dated 15.7.2012 petitioner was transferred to another school in the same district. Pointing out personal inconvenience and various other grounds petitioner approached this Court by challenging the transfer in W.P. No.13497/2012(s). This Court on 29.8.2012 found that the grounds raised by petitioner are not such on the basis of which interference can be made by a writ court, but granted liberty to the petitioner to take recouRs. of remedy available. Petitioner subm...
Santosh Ram Bunkar Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-01-2012
W.P.No.16208/2012 01.10.2012 Shri R.S.Khare, learned counsel for the petitioneRs.Shri S.M.Lal, learned Govt. Advocate for respondents, on advance copy. Petitioners are challenging an action of the respondents in denying the benefit of second Kramonnati and proposing to make recovery of benefit already granted, the question involved in this petition already decided by a Bench of this Court in the case of Smt. Prerna W/o Shri Pramod Koranne versus State of M.P.and others in W.P.No.6773/2006, decided on 26.04.2007, and subsequently followed by this Court in series of cases, one such order being W.P.No.5756/2008 (s).Shri R.C.Chaurasiya and others versus State of M.P.and otheRs.decided on 26.05.2008. In the case of Smt. Prerna (supra) the directions given is as under. 17. Consequently these petitions are allowed. The petitioners are entitled to derive the benefit of second Kramonnati according to the terms and conditions mentioned in the circular dated 21/03/1983 19/4/1999, 02/11/2001 and 0...
- ‹ Prev
- 99
- 100
- 101
- 102
- 103
- 104
- 105
- 106
- 107
- 108
- Next ›