Madhya Pradesh Court October 2008 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Vijay Jaiswal Vs. Smt. Nisha Jaiswal
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-15-2008
Reported in: 2008(5)MPHT263
Arun Mishra, J.1. The appeal has been preferred by the husband aggrieved by dismissal of his application seeking dissolution of marriage filed under Section 12 of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, same has been dismissed as barred by limitation vide impugned order dated 15-7-05 passed by Family Court, Bhopal in RCS No. 66-A/05.2. The controverted facts relevant for decision of the appeal are that marriage of appellant Vijay was performed with Smt. Nisha on 28-6-03. The application was filed seeking dissolution of marriage on 21-2-05.3. It was claimed by the husband that he came to know on 15-1-2005 of pregnancy of wife, at the time of solemnization of marriage when he found certain prescriptions in which it was mentioned that wife was carrying pregnancy of 12 weeks on 15-7-2003 from someone else whereas marriage was performed two weeks before. Thus, the application for dissolution was filed under Section 12(1)(d) of Hindu Marriage Act. An application under Order 7 Rule 11, CPC was filed by the...
Dwarkalal and anr. Vs. Government of India
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-15-2008
Reported in: 2009(1)MPHT468
S.L. Kochar, J.1. By this appeal, the appellants have challenged their conviction under Sections 8/21(c) and 21(c) read with Section 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act (for short 'the NDPS Act') and sentence of R.I. for 13 years and fine of Rs. 1,50,000/- each, in default of payment of fine to suffer additional R.I. for four years, passed by the learned Special Judge (under NDPS Act), Indore in Special Case No. 29/2001 by judgment dated 14-10-2003.2. According to the prosecution case on 26-7-01 the complainant Smt. Sabia Khan (P.W. 8) was posted as Inspector and Ravindrasingh Negi as Sub-Inspector in the Central Narcotics Bureau, Indore. On this day, Ravindrasingh received information from Mukhbir that two persons namely; Raghunathsingh resident of Village Dabla and Dwarkalal of Village Misroli will be proceeding from Indore to Dhulia with heroin between 6.00 and 8.00 p.m. Ravindrasingh prepared a Panchnama (Exh. P-l) of this information in presence of Constables ...
Rahul Singh Vs. State of M.P. and ors.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-15-2008
Reported in: 2009(2)MPHT38; 2009(3)SLJ176(NULL)
ORDERS.C. Sharma, J.1. The petitioner before this Court is a Child Constable working at 5th Battalion, Special Armed Force, Morena has filed this present writ petition through his guardian mother Munnidevi assailing the legality and validity of the order dated 6-11-2002 by which the compassionate appointment granted to the petitioner has been cancelled.2. The contention of the petitioner is that the father of the petitioner was serving the Special Armed Force and died in harness while in service. The petitioner has submitted an application for grant of compassionate appointment and the Competent Authority by an order dated 29-8-2001 has granted compassionate appointment to the petitioner as Child Constable. It is also pertinent to note that petitioner while submitting an application for grant of compassionate appointment on 6-8-1997 has categorically informed the Deputy Inspector General SAF, Gwalior that he is son of Smt. Munnidevi who is second wife of the deceased Government servant...
Kavindra Nath Thakur Vs. the State of M.P.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-14-2008
Reported in: 2009(1)MPHT29
K.S. Chauhan, J.1. This criminal appeal under Section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure has been preferred being aggrieved by the judgment, finding and sentence dated 8-8-1994 passed by Special Judge, Balaghat in Special Case No. 31/1992, whereby the appellant has been convicted under Section 3(1)(x) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 and sentenced to R.I. for 6 months with fine of Rs. 200/-, in default of payment of fine S.I. for 1 1/2 months.2. Prosecution case in short is that on 28-2-1992 at about 5.30 p.m. complainant Bharatlal Mahar, Peon in the office of Block Development Officer, Khairlanji brought Government dak to the house of Kavindra Nath Thakur, Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat, Kinhi for delivery. He read the letter and thereafter hurled abuses to BDO and the complainant himself. Thereafter he also assaulted the complainant with fist and kick blows and gave him shoe beating. Thus he intentionally insulted and threatened to t...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- Next ›