Madhya Pradesh Court January 2008 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
State of M.P. Vs. Ashok
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-03-2008
Reported in: 2008(2)MPHT281
Abhay Gohil, J.1. State has preferred this appeal under Section 378 Cr.P.C. after obtaining the leave from this Court against the judgment of acquittal dt.11.9.1996 passed by the Sessions Judge Shivpuri in Sessions Trial No. 165/95 for the offences under Section 302 read with Section 201 of IPC. 2. As per the prosecution story, on 27.7.1995, at about 7.30 p.m. in the evening deceased Hariram alongwith his nephew respondent had gone to ease himself near Aamghat, but in the night deceased Hariram did not come back. Mulua, father of Hariram, enquired from the respondent about the whereabouts of Hariram, but he said that he is not aware about him. The deceased was searched in the night but on the next day at about 12 p.m. his dead body was found lying in the water in Aamghat Nala, which was also stained with blood. It was also the prosecution case that the respondent, who is the nephew of the deceased has developed a liking towards the wife of Hariram and on account of this, the relations ...
Narmada Constructions Vs. Western Coalfields Ltd.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-03-2008
Reported in: 2008(4)ARBLR246(MP)
Arun Mishra, J.1. The appeals have been preferred by the contractor aggrieved by order dated 21.02.2002 passed in Civil Suit Nos. 18/2001 and 19/2001 refusing to modify/set aside separate awards passed by arbitrator on 26.03.1997.2. Facts are being referred from MA No. 1065/2002 as it is conceded at bar that decision of MA No. 1065/2002 would decide the issue raised in MA No. 1063/2002 on factual and legal aspects both.3. The contractor was given work of construction of quarters pursuant to tender dated 15.05.1990, an agreement 13/91-92 dated 02.01.1992 was entered into between the parties, cost of construction work was Rs. 2,35,26,072.30, the period of completion of work was 18 months. The Western Coalfields Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as 'WCL') was required to supply cement, electricity and coal for manufacturing of bricks. It is also not in dispute that as per contract the work could not be completed within 18 months, period of 57 months was extended as per several orders, in spit...
Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Rajendra Kumar
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-02-2008
Reported in: [2009]178TAXMAN208(MP)
May it please your Lordships,1. The above named appellant being aggrieved by the order passed by the ITAT in IT Appeal (SS) No. 1 l/Ind./2005 dated 20-7-2007 for the block period 1-4-1995 to 5-12-2001 humbly prefers this appeal as under:Facts In Brief2. The brief facts of the case are that the search action under Section 132 of the Act was conducted in this case on 5-12-2001. The assessee was doing the business of sales and purchases of wheat, gram, soya, etc. During the assessment proceedings, it was noted that there were cash entries in the name of the farmers.Income-tax Appeal No. 430/2007, 2-1-20083. Mr. R.L. Jain, senior advocate with Ms. Veena Mandlik, counsel for the appellant.Heard on the question of admission.4. The appellant being aggrieved by the order passed by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal in IT Appeal (SS )No. 11 /Ind./2005, dated 20-7-2007 for the Block period between 1-4-1995 to 5-12-2001, is before this Court with a submission that the Tribunal erred in not appreci...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- Next ›