Madhya Pradesh Court November 2006 Judgments

Kamta Prasad Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Reported in: 2007CriLJ695

ORDERA.K. Gohil, J.1. This is complainant's revision under Section 397 read with Section 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, against the judgment of acquittal dated 18-12-1998 passed by First Additional Sessions Judge, Vidisha in Sessions Trial No. 165/97 for the offences under Sections 307 and 307/34 of Indian Penal Code.2. We have heard Shri Amit Lahoti, learned Counsel for the applicant/complainant, Shri M.P.S. Bhadoriya, learned Govt. Advocate for the respondent No. 1/State and Shri S.S. Rajput, learned Counsel for the respondent Nos. 2 and 3.3. At the outset, learned Counsel for the applicant submitted that he will not press this revision against respondent No. 2 Kanchedi s/o Shankar Lal because he was not named in the FIR and he was not involved in the commission of crime. Therefore, the appeal as against respondent No. 2 is dismissed.4. So far as the case against Bhavsingh s/o Kanchedi Lal is concerned, in the FIR it was the case of complainant injured Kamta Prasad that Bhav ...