Madhya Pradesh Court March 2003 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Bhagirath (Deceased) Through L.Rs. Kanhaiyalal and ors. Vs. Lal Singh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-04-2003
Reported in: 2003(2)MPHT405
A.M. Sapre, J.1. It is a second appeal filed under Section 100 of CPC by the plaintiff against the judgment/decree, dated 1-10-1980, passed by learned IVth Additional District Judge, Ujjain, in C.A. No. 46-A of 1977, which in turn arises out of Civil Suit No. 27-A of 1973, decided by Civil Judge, Class II, Badnagar, on 4-5-1976. It was admitted for final hearing on following substantial questions of law:--'(1) Whether on the coming into force of Abolition of Zamindari, Lalsingh could be said to be in occupation of the land ? (2) Whether the transfer in favour of Lalsingh would be void, as he was minor at that time ?' 2. Heard Shri M. Barania, learned Counsel for the appellants. None for the respondent despite service.3. Having heard the learned Counsel for the appellants and having perused the record of the case, I am unable to notice any infirmity in the impugned judgment/decree and hence, appeal must be dismissed.4. It was a case where the plaintiff (appellant) herein sought adeclara...
Rajkumar Vs. State of M.P. and ors.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-03-2003
Reported in: 2003(3)MPHT108
ORDERS.L. Jain, J.1. Being aggrieved by the order dated 22-3-2002 passed by the learned Single Judge in Writ Petition No. 5647/2001, the appellant has filed this L.P. A. under Clause 10 of Letters Patent.2. The facts, shorn of details and necessary for disposal of thisappeal, are that a meeting of Gram Sabha, Khawasa was called on 26-3-2001but the same was adjourned to 31-3-2001 for want of quorum. On 31-3-2001out of 1800 members only 332 members were present. The appellant who waspresent in the meeting as a member of Gram Sabha, raised an objection thatthe business cannot be transacted for want of quorum but the same was ruledout. In this meeting certain Standing Committees of Gram Sabha were constituted and a cashier was also appointed. Being aggrieved, the appellantmoved the Appellate Committee, Janpad Panchayat, Kurai. Disposing of theappeal under Rules 5 and 7 of the Madhya Pradesh Gram Sabha Appeal Rules,2001, the Appellate Committee vide its order dated 6-11-2001 held that thepr...
Om Prakash Vs. Chhunilal
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-03-2003
Reported in: II(2003)ACC750
ORDERA.K. Gohil, J.1. The claimant has filed this appeal for enhancement of compensation under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The Tribunal has awarded only a compensation of Rs. 5,100.00 for a simple injury suffered by the claimant. It is the submission of the claimant that he received fracture in the hand as well as in the neck and also one fracture in the ring finger of left hand. On the basis of Ex. P/4, which is M.L.C. report, the Tribunal has not accepted that it is a case of fracture because in M.L.C. report (Ex. P/4) it has not been mentioned that he received any fracture. The claimant has also not produced any treatment papers. The incident took place on 24.12.1997. He produced one disability certificate of date 15.10.1999 for these injuries but there is no other evidence on record to accept this contention of the claimant that he received any fracture. In other treatment papers also it has not been mentioned that the claimant suffered any fracture. The claimant h...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- Next ›