Madhya Pradesh Court August 2002 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Abdul Hamid Vs. Ku. Gazala Parveen
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-02-2002
Reported in: 2002(5)MPHT283
ORDERAjit Singh, J.1. This revision is directed against the order dated 12-5-1998 passed by the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Rewa in M.J.C. No. 19/98 (old No. 9/97) whereby relief for grant of maintenance at the rate of Rs. 400/- per month from 8-2-1997 has been allowed in favour of respondent till she is married.2. The respondent is daughter of petitioner. Her date of birth is 9-2-72 and she completed the age of 18 years on 8-2-1997. She filed an application under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Code') for grant of maintenance allowance after attaining majority on 8-2-1997 claiming that she was entitled for maintenance till she is married. The petitioner opposed the application on the ground that the day the respondent attained her age of majority, his liability to maintain her ceased under Section 125 of the Code. The Court below placing reliance on the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Noor Saba Khatoon v. Mohd. Qu...
Amrit Singh Yadav Vs. State Transport Appellate Tribunal and ors.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-01-2002
Reported in: 2002(4)MPHT518
ORDERRajendra Menon, J. 1. By this petition the petitioner has challenged the order dated 10-7-2002 (Annexure P-1). The aforesaid order has been passed in a revision pending before the respondent No. 1 Tribunal in Revision No. 661/2001.2. The order is passed staying the operation of the petitioner's vehicle and the revision is pending adjudication on merit before the Tribunal. It is the case of that he was granted permit No. 286/STA/96 on route Bhander to Salethara via Bichhodama, Chirgaon, Simthari in the year 1996 valid upto 31-5-2001. Thereafter permit was renewed vide order dated 7-6-2001 (Annexure P-3) for the period 26-5-2001 to 25-5-2006. Being aggrieved by the aforesaid order of renewal respondent No. 3 has filed the said Revision No. 661/2001 which is pending before the Appellate Tribunal. On an application for stay being moved by respondent No. 3, the Tribunal vide order dated 19-3-2002 directed for survey of the route and called for report however once survey was conducted t...
Santosh Kumar Chopda Vs. State of M.P. and ors.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-01-2002
Reported in: 2003(1)MPHT343; 2002(4)MPLJ440
ORDERArun Mishra, J.1. Petitioner in this writ petition is challenging the demand notices P-20 and P-14 and the orders passed by the Recovery Officer P-15 and P-16.2. Petitioner submitted the tender for purchase of Tendu leaves for 1984 season; tenders were called for auction of Tendu leaves on 3-8-1985 at Divisional Forest Office, Seoni for Unit No. 3, Lot Nos. 1 and 2 of 1121.305 standard bags and 1122 standard bags respectively. Petitioner had offered his bid for Unit No. 3, Lot No. 1, Lakhnadone, at the rate of Rs. 125/- per standard bag and for Lot No. 2 of Unit No. 3 at the rate of Rs. 127/- per standard bag. Total price for Lot No. 1 was Rs. 1,63,212.95 paisa and for Lot No. 2 Rs. 1,65,927/-. As per terms and conditions of the tender notice before bidding, earnest money to the tune of Rs. 6,000/- was to be deposited for each lot thereafter the bid sheet was to be signed on offering the bid. Thereafter 25% of the amount was to be deposited on making of the said bid. The amount of...
State of Madhya Pradesh and anr. Vs. Latha Kumaran and ors.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-01-2002
Reported in: 2004ACJ1622; 2003(4)MPLJ7
Bhawani Singh, C.J.1. Through this appeal, award of Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Bhopal, dated 25.10.1994, passed in Claim Case No. 103 of 1993, has been challenged.2. Shortly stated, Latha Kumaran (the claimant) was a nurse in Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd. (BHEL) Hospital, Bhopal. On 12.6.1991 she was being taken to hospital by ambulance No. MKC 299 at 11.30 p.m. by Vedpal Bhasin (driver). The ambulance was going on the main road from Sector A to Sector B. When it reached at intersection near Piplani Police Station, the vehicle No. MPP 3655 of Police Department came from side road resulting in collision of both the vehicles. As a result of this accident, the front portion of ambulance and the side portion between front and rear wheels of the police vehicle were damaged. The claimant suffered injuries to her spinal cord and became paralytic.3. The claimant filed a claim petition for compensation of Rs. 7,40,000 alleging, inter alia, that both the drivers were liable for the acciden...
New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Vinod and Two ors.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-01-2002
Reported in: I(2004)ACC592
ORDER1. The applicant-respondent No. 1, who was driver of a Matador No. CPG-8309, received injuries in the accident caused by rash and negligent driving of a Bus No. MBW-1368.2. Learned third Additional Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Morena in Claim Case No. 151/96 vide the award dated 4.12.1996 came to the conclusion that respondent No. 1-applicant suffered injuries on account of negligent driving of the bus and consequently granted compensation of Rs. 1,15,000/- against which the present appeal has been filed on behalf of Insurance Company.3. The learned Counsel of respondent No. 1, has raised a preliminary objection regarding maintainability of the appeal in absence of permission to defend on other ground envisaged under Section 149(2) of the Motor Vehicles Act. However, this controversy has been set at rest by the Hon'ble Apex Court by its decision in the case of United India Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Bhushan Sachdeva and Ors. reported on 2002 ACJ 333, holding that Insurance Company f...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- Next ›