Madhya Pradesh Court March 2002 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Nathuram Rakhabdas and ors. Vs. Ramesh Chand
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-05-2002
Reported in: AIR2002MP251; 2002(4)MPLJ146
S.L. Kochar, J.1. These appeals have been directed against the judgment and decree passed by 4th Addl. District Judge, Mandsour in CRA No. 48-A/2000 and 49-A/2000 decided on 4-9-2001 whereby the judgment and decree passed by First Civil Judge, Class-I Mandsour in Civil Original Suit Nos. 13-A/99 and 14-A/99 dated 20-11-2000 has been set aside and the case has been remanded back to the trial Court for pronouncement of judgment afresh on the basis of pleading and evidence available in the said civil suit independently.2. The civil suit filed by Rameshchandra-respondent vide Civil Suit No. 13-A/99, the trial Court has refused to grant permanent injunction in favour of the appellant whose right of easement in a lane (Gallyara) was obstructed by the appellant and accepted the counter claim filed by appellants/defendants Nathuram restraining the respondents/plaintiffs to use disputed passage and imposed damage of Rs. 5,000/- for removal of channel gate installed by appellant/defendant. Anoth...
Nagrik Upbhokta Margdarshak Manch Vs. State of M.P. and ors.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-05-2002
Reported in: 2002CriLJ4215; 2003(1)MPLJ264
ORDER1. There is an age old saying that spiritual growth is not alien or dissociated from bodily health. Fitness of body is as important as alterness of mind which is sometimes comparable to awareness of being. In absence of harmony and compatibility there cannot be a composite projection of the mind body relationship which may lead to serious psychospmatic disorders. He who conceives the idea of the growth of mind can not ostracise the essence of physical growth which is dependent on the atmosphere and grows up. Pollution free atmosphere and hygienic food are essential, nay, preliminary requisite for the growth of Homo sapiens as they stand demarcated and separated from other beings. That is hypostasis of basic existence which has nexus with humane development. Not for nothing it has been said that one day indulge in a religious activity but while so doing he cannot totally abandon the effort or a demand to uplift his physical health. Health does play a paramount role not only in the ...
Om Metals and Minerals Vs. Bansagar Control Board (M.P.) and ors.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-05-2002
Reported in: 2002(5)MPHT537
ORDERArun Mishra, J.1. The petitioner in the instant writ petition seeks issue of writ of mandamous directing the respondents to issue the petitioner, company, tender forms in respect of tender No. 11/2001-2002 11/2001-2002 and to consider the petitioner, company, for participation in the tender process.2. The petitioner alleges that it is a pioneer company in the field of manufacture of Heavy Steel Structural and Hydraulic Gates, Hoist, Gantry Crane, etc. for Hydel and Irrigation Projects. It has completed several projects in Madhya Pradesh successfully. The petitioner further submits that the petitioner, company, was conferred Udyog Patra on behalf of the Institute of Trade and Development in the year 1981. The Chief Engineer, Bansagar Dam Project, Rewa, the respondent No. 1, invited two tenders, one for the work of design, drawing, fabrication, supply erection and testing of 18 nos. Radial Gates alongwith second stage concreting for Bansagar Dam Project vide NIT No. 6 of 1999-2000, ...
Pratipal Singh Vs. State of M.P. and ors.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-04-2002
Reported in: 2002(2)MPHT273
ORDERS.S. Jha, J. 1.This letters patent appeal has been filed against the dismissal of Writ Petition No. 809/1987.2. Brief facts of the case are that appellant was granted licence in Form F.L. 3 of liquor contract for the period between 1-4-1986 to 31-3-1988. Appellant's bid was the highest for Indergarh shop for Indian made foreign liquor for a sum of Rs. 3,15,000/-. Appellant could not run the shop successfully and was not in a position to deposit the monthly instalment of licence-fee everymonth. Appellant was declared defaulter and his licence was cancelled. The show was then re-auctioned on 28-11-1987. In the re-auction, highest bid of Kanhaiyalal of Rs. 2,01,000/- was accepted. Said Kanhaiyalal deposited Rs. 23,000/- and failed to deposit remaining 1/6th amount of bid by 17-3-1987. On failure to deposit the amount, shop was against auctioned on 2-5-1987 and in the auction, the shop was knocked down in favour of Ayub Khan for a sum of Rs. 60,000/- for unexpircd period of licence.3....
Ramdeen Vs. State of M.P. and ors.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-04-2002
Reported in: 2002(3)MPHT180; 2002(3)MPLJ231
ORDERArun Mishra, J. 1. Petitioner is challenging the legality of the order passed by the prescribed authority, SDO, allowing the election petition, Annexure P-6 passed on 5-10-2001 directing recount without recording any evidence.2. Respondent No. 3 Pradip Kumar filed election petition before the SDO challenging the election of Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat, Padkhuri, Block Rampur, District Sidhi. Respondent No. 3 was another candidate. He complained of certain irregularities in the counting. It was alleged that the counting was started late in the night 1.00 a.m. The counting was completed in inadequate light and the votes were illegally counted in favour of the return candidate, Shri Ramdeen.3. Allegations were refuted by the petitioner. It was contended that the counting was properly held. There was no illegality or irregularity whatsoever.4. Respondent No. 3 filed 12 affidavits. An application was filed by the petitioner to call those deponents for cross-examination. The prescribed aut...
State of M.P. Vs. Laxmi Chand Awadhiya and ors.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-01-2002
Reported in: 2002(5)MPHT228; 2002(4)MPLJ343
ORDERDipak Misra, J.1. This batch of writ petitions, being interconnected and interlinked, raising common grounds to assail the orders of the State Administrative Tribunal passed separately in individual cases, was heard together and is disposed of by this common order.2. Ordinarily when the matters are heard analogously the facts in one case are uncurtained and adumbrated but in this batch of cases we are inclined to exposit the facts in each case for the simple reason to a great extent, the facts in each case are similar but thereafter the facts have to be stated separately qua each case, so that the clarity holds sway and one is not compelled to get into a situation of labyrinth or imbroglio. Hence, we proceed to narrate.3. In W.P. No. 5510/2000, the respondent No. 1 Laxmi Chand Awadhiya feeling aggrieved by the order of compulsory retirement passed in accordance with Rule 42 of the Civil Service (Pension) Rules, 1976 (for brevity 'the Rule') read with F.R. 56 on 1-10-97, approached...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- Next ›