Madhya Pradesh Court July 2001 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Subhash Chand JaIn Vs. Anil Kumar JaIn and ors.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-20-2001
Reported in: 2003ACJ1270; 2001(4)MPHT272
ORDERS.P. Srivastava, J. 1. Feeling aggrieved by the rejection of his claim petition for the award of compensation in the proceedings under the Motor Vehicles Act, the claimant-appellant has now approached this Court seeking redress praying for setting aside of the impugned order and awarding an amount of Rs. 3,70,742/-as compensation along with interest thereon calculated at the rate of 18% per annum. 2. We have heard the learned counsel for the appellant as well as the learned counsel representing the insurer. In spite of service of the notice, none has appeared for the respondent No. 2, the owner and the respondent No. 1, the driver, of the motor vehicle in question. 3. The facts in brief, shorn of details and necessary for the disposal ofthis appeal lie in a narrow compass : A claim petition seeking award of the compensation was filed under Section 140 as well as under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (hereinafter referred to as the Act), on 23-12-1995, by the appellant ...
Babulal Vs. Jagtap Singh and anr.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-20-2001
Reported in: 2003ACJ166; (2002)IILLJ224MP; 2002(1)MPLJ279
C.K. Prasad, J. 1. Appellant being aggrieved by the judgment dated August 4, 1998 passed in Misc. Appeal No. 613/96 by a learned single Judge of this Court whereby the appeal preferred by him under Section 30 of the Workmen's Compensation Act had been dismissed, has preferred this appeal.2. According to the appellant, he was: working as a labourer for digging well in agricultural field of the respondents on May 12, 1987 at the rate of Rs. 10/- per day as wages. According to him, while he was working in the well, it subsided and he got entranged after fall inside the well. He suffered number of injuries and became permanently disabled having lost movability of his legs and had to suffer amputation of toe of one of the legs. He filed application claiming compensation under: Section 23 of the Workmen's Compensation Act, hereinafter referred to as the Act.3. Respondents contested the claim of the appellant and denied that the appellant was, engaged as a labourer on the alleged date of inci...
National Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Kanti Bai and ors.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-20-2001
Reported in: 2003ACJ372
S.P. Srivastava, J.1. Feeling aggrieved by the impugned award of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Guna, holding the insurance company to be liable to pay an amount of Rs. 1,00,000 to the claimants, the heirs of the deceased victim of the motor accident, it has now come up in appeal seeking redress praying for its being exonerated from the liability to pay any amount towards the compensation and modification of the award accordingly.2. We have heard learned Counsel for the appellant as well as the learned Counsel representing the claimants-respondents and have carefully perused the record.3. The facts in brief shorn of details and necessary for the disposal of this appeal lie in a narrow compass: A claim petition had been filed by the claimants-respondents, the legal heirs of the deceased Ramsingh, praying for the award of compensation of an amount of Rs. 12,60,000 along with interest calculated at the rate of 24 per cent per annum on 24.8.1992 specifying clearly therein that the sa...
Pushpa Devi and ors. Vs. Kamal Singh and ors.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-20-2001
Reported in: 2003ACJ383; 2001(3)MPLJ548
S.P. Srivastava, J.1. Feeling aggrieved by an award of Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal under the proceedings under Section 110-A of Motor Vehicles Act, 1939, whereunder as against the claim of compensation to the extent of Rs. 6,88,000 by the present claimants-appellants, they had been awarded an amount of Rs. 2,16,000 and that too against the owner and driver of the offending motor vehicle which was a tractor exonerating the insurer company, they have now come up in appeal praying for modification of the award and grant of the amount of compensation as prayed for against not only the owner and driver but also against the insurer.2. We have heard the learned Counsel for the parties and have carefully perused the record.3. The facts in brief shorn of details and necessary for the disposal of this appeal lie in a narrow compass: Dwarika Prasad the husband of the appellant No. 1 and the father of the other appellants died in an accident involving the offending motor vehicle, tractor beari...
Mst. Puspadevi and ors. Vs. Kamal Singh and ors.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-20-2001
Reported in: 1(2002)ACC616
ORDER1. Feeling aggrieved by an award of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal under the proceedings under Section 110-A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939, whereunder as against the claim of compensation to the extent of Rs. 6,88,000/- by the present claimants/appellants, they had been awarded an amount of Rs. 2,16,000/- and that too against the owner and the driver of the offending motor vehicle which was a tractor exonerating the insurer-Company, they have now come up in appeal praying for modification of the award and grant of the amount of compensation as prayed for against not only the owner and the driver but also against the insurer.2. We have heard the learned Counsel for the parties and have carefully perused the record.3. The facts in brief shorn of details and necessary for the disposal of this appeal lie in a narrow compass: Dwarika Prasad the husband of the appellant No. 1 and the father of the other appellants died in an accident involving the offending motor vehicle, tractor ...
National Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Geetabai and ors.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-20-2001
Reported in: 2003ACJ196; 2001(3)MPLJ573
S.P. Srivastava, J.1. Feeling aggrieved by the impugned award passed by Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Guna, holding the insurer company to be liable to pay an amount of Rs. 1,12,000 to the claimants, heirs of the deceased victim of the motor accident, it has come up in appeal seeking redress praying for its being exonerated from liability to pay any amount towards the compensation and modification of the award accordingly.2. We have heard learned Counsel for the appellant as well as the learned Counsel representing the claimants-respondents and have carefully perused the record.3. The facts, shorn of details and necessary for the disposal of this appeal lie in a narrow compass: A claim petition had been filed by the claimants-respondents, the legal heirs of the deceased, Madanlal, praying for the award as compensation an amount of Rs. 12,60,000 along with interest calculated at the rate of 24 per cent per annum on 10.8.1992 specifying clearly therein that the said petition was being...
Taxation Authority and anr. Vs. Parasmal
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-19-2001
Reported in: 1(2002)ACC384
S.B. Sakrikar, J.1. Appellants-defendants have directed this appeal against the judgment and the decree dated 23rd January, 1990, passed by ADJ, Kukshi, District Dhar in Civil Suit No. 11A/87, thereby decreeing the suit filed by the respondent-plaintiff, for the relief of declaration and permanent injunction.2. Briefly stated the facts of the case are that the respondent-plaintiff is a bus owner and has a permit to ply his buses from Jobat to Kukshi for a distance of 37 kms. This distance of 37 kms. consists of 21 kms. 'Kachhi Sadak' and 16 kms. 'Pakki Sadak' as defined under the M.P. Motor Vehicles Taxation Act, 1947 (for short 'the Taxation Act of 1947'). The plaintiff also has a permit to ply his other bus from Nisarpur to Dhar. The total distance is 115 kms. consists of 29 kms. 'Kachhi Sadak' and 86 kms. 'Pakki Sadak'. The plaintiff is depositing the taxes as per Schedule annexed to the Taxation Act of 1947.3. On 23.1.1987 appellant No. 1 exercising powers under Section '3-A' of th...
Central Ware Housing Corporation Vs. J.S. Brah
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-18-2001
Reported in: 2001(3)MPHT449
ORDERS.P. Srivastava, J. 1. Feeling aggrieved by the judgment and order passed by the learned Single Judge whereunder allowing the writ petition filed by the contesting respondent the punishment of removal from service imposed upon him has been set aside substituting reversion for the same for one step below the post held by him with a further directing requiring the appellant to pay him fifty per cent of the back wages which he would have earned on the reverted post, the employerhas now come up in Letters Patent Appeal seeking redress praying for the reversal of the impugned order. 2. We have heard the learned counsel for the appellant as well as the learned counsel representing the contesting respondent and have carefully perused the record. 3. The facts in brief, shorn of details and necessary for the disposal of this appeal lie in a narrow compass. A common disciplinary proceeding under the provisions of the Central Ware Housing Corporation (Staff) Regulations, 1986, was initiated ...
Kalabai Choubey and ors. Vs. Rajabahadur Yadav and anr.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-18-2001
Reported in: 2003ACJ94; 2001(3)MPLJ554
S.P. Srivastava, J.1. The appellants-claimants had filed an application under Section 110-A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act', for short), for the award of compensation initiating the proceedings arising out of an accident involving a motor vehicle, a tractor bearing registration No. CPW 5418 wherein Chandrabhan Choubey had met his untimely death.2. The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal on consideration of the evidence and the materials brought on record by the various parties had determined that the present appellants, i.e., the wife and children of the deceased were entitled to an amount of Rs. 25,000 towards compensation on the basis of no fault liability from the owner-driver of the motor vehicle in question only; exonerating the insurance company on account of the violation of the terms and conditions of the insurance policy.3. Accordingly, the aforesaid Tribunal granted an award of only Rs. 25,000 under Section 110-B of the Act, specifying that t...
Smt. Shail Kumari Vs. M.P. Electricity Board and anr.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-17-2001
Reported in: 2002ACJ424; AIR2002MP86; 2002(1)MPLJ531
Bhawani Singh, C. J. 1. This appeal arises out of judgment of Addl. District Judge (10th), Bhopal passed in Regular Civil Suit No. 3-B/98 dated 3-5-1999. 2. Before adverting to, the questions which call for consideration and determination in this case, it is desirable that some material facts of the case are narrated. 3. Smt. Shall Kumari (26) is wife of Jogendra Singh (deceased) and Deepak Kumar (7) is son of the deceased. They claimed compensation from the respondents for the death of Jogendra Singh by electrocution. Incident took place on 23-8-1997 when the deceased was going for duty on his bicycle and when he reached Sunder Nagar, naked electricity live wire of Madhya Pradesh Electricity Board (MPEB) was lying on the road and when the deceased got down from his bicycle, he came in contact with it and was electrocuted and died on the spot. Allegation is that Hari Galkwad had been taking illegal electricity connection from the electric pole. It was the duty of the MPEB to maintain t...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 4
- 5
- 6
- Next ›
- Last »