Madhya Pradesh Court November 2001 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
i.J. Kapani Vs. Uoi
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-05-2001
Reported in: [2002]121TAXMAN229(MP)
ORDERSapre, J. Petitioner claiming to be an industrial consultant by profession and resident of Indore has filed this petition under articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, as Public Interest Litigation (PIL) essentially against the Income Tax Department and also against one individual (who too was added by way of amendment as respondent No. 4 in the writ) - Mr. Gangadhar Verma. By this petition, the grievance of the petitioner is that several persons/ firms /associations /companies, who are engaged in the business of sale, purchase of land and construction of buildings (known as builders in common parlance) in city of Indore, are indulging in tax evasion to the tune of crores of rupees by resorting to several illegal means while carrying on their business activities. It is complained that the modus operandi resorted to by these builders has put the exchequer in loss to a great extent. To support the complaint, the petitioner has impleaded one of the builders as respondent N...
N.D. Grover Vs. State of M.P. and ors.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-02-2001
Reported in: 2002(1)MPHT497; 2002(2)MPLJ295
ORDERDipak Misra, J.1. Invoking the extra-ordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India the petitioner has prayed for issuance of a direction to the respondents to open the tender submitted by the petitioner and further to consider the offer of the petitioner in accordance with law and award the work in his favour as his offer is the lowest. There is a further prayer to conduct an enquiry with regard to the conduct of the respondent No. 5 and to grant any other relief/reliefs as may deemed just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.2. The facts as have been exposited in the writ petition are that the petitioner is a Class V contractor and is registered with the Water Resources Department. The competent authority of the Water Resources Department had published a notice inviting tenders in the month of November, 2000 for the construction of Panda Tank which was valued at Rs. 59.60 lacs. The petitioner participated in the bid a...
Nandlal Khanchand Khatri Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-02-2001
Reported in: [2003]260ITR318(MP)
A.M. Sapre J.1. The decision rendered in this appeal shall govern the disposal of other connected appeals being I. T. A. No. 48 of 2001 (N. Khanchand Khatri v. CIT) I. T. R. No. 49 of 2001 (N. Khanchand Khari v. CIT) and I. T. A. No. 50 of 2001 (N. Khanchand Khatri v. CIT) as all these appeals involve common issues and, secondly, they are filed by the same assessee except the difference being that these appeals arise out of different assessment years and were disposed of by a common order by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Indore. 2. The present appeal is filed under Section 260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961, which arise out of order dated April 12,2001, by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Indore, in I. T. A. Nos. 216, 217 and 218/Ind of 1996.3. They relate to the assessment years 1987-88, 1988-89 and 1991-92. It appears' that on September 13, 1990, a search operation was carried out in the premises of the assessee resulting in seizure of several incriminating documents. This led t...
Nandlal Khanchand Khatri Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-02-2001
Reported in: (2003)185CTR(MP)555
A.M. Sapre, J.1. The decision rendered in this appeal shall govern the disposal of other connected appeals being ITA No. 48 of 2001 (N. Khanchand Khatri v. CJT), IT Ref. No. 49 of 2001 (N. Khanchand Khatri v. CIT) and ITA No. 50 of 2001 (N. Khanchand Khatri v. CIT) as all these appeals involve common issues and, secondly, they are filed by the same assessee except the difference being that these appeals arise out of different assessment years and were disposed of by a common order by the Tribunal, Indore.2. The present appeal is filed under Section 260A of the IT Act, 1961, which arise out of order dt. 12th April, 2001, by the Tribunal, Indore, in ITA Nos. 216, 217 and 218/Ind. of 1996.3. They relate to the asst. yrs. 1987-88, 1988-89 and 1991-92. It appears that on 13th Sept., 1990, a search operation was carried out in the premises of the assessee resulting in seizure of several incriminating documents. This led to issuance of notices to the assessee under Section 148 of the Act by t...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- Next ›