Madhya Pradesh Court June 2000 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
E.S.i. Corporation Vs. Dave Griha Udyog
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-19-2000
Reported in: [2000(86)FLR875]; (2001)ILLJ42MP
A.M. Sapre, J.1. This appeal is preferred by Employees' State Insurance Corporation under Section 82 of the Employees' State insurance Act, 1948 (hereinafter referred to Act for brevity) against an order dated December 6, 1997, passed by Presiding Officer (Labour Court, indorc) in case No. 1/ESI/1992. By impugned order, the learned Presiding Officer has allowed the application made by the respondent under Section 75 of the Act and has held that respondents are not liable to make any contribution under the Act and that demand dated July 17, 1991 raised by the appellant on respondent to comply with the provisions of Act is bad in law. Facts in brief to appreciate the issue involved in this appeal need mention.2. A show cause notice under Section 45A of the Act was issued to the respondent alleging inter alia therein that respondent is a factory falling within the meaning of the word factory defined in Section 2(12) of the Act and hence, it was necessary for them (respondent) to make cont...
Manaklal and anr. Vs. Nandlal and ors.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-19-2000
Reported in: 2000(3)MPHT443
ORDERJ.G. Chitre, J.1. The grievance made by the petitioners is that the Court was pleased to re-call the defendant Manaklal for the purpose of his examination in respect of some documents. However, a request was made for the purpose of re-calling the petitioner for asking him some questions in respect of mutation entries, effected in the property register maintained by the Municipal Council, Mandsaur. Shri Bhatnagar submitted that on account of this order, injustice is being caused to the present petitioners as it is studded with discrimination.2. I do not find any substance in the submissions because the Court has pointed out in its Order that there was sufficient opportunity for the petitioners to get the certified copies of the said register and put the questions when he was examined. By pointing out this, the Court has said that the Court did not feel it necessary to call the concerned clerk of the Municipal Council, Mandsaur with such documents and the attesting witnesses of the ...
Chandmal and ors. Vs. Jhamaklal and anr.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-19-2000
Reported in: 2000(4)MPHT35; 2000(3)MPLJ637
ORDERA.M. Sapre, J.1. Could the surviving arbitrator deliver an award on the death of co-arbitrator which occurred pending arbitration reference before them and whether such an award delivered by surviving arbitrator be made rule of Court under the repealed Arbitration Act was the question posed by the learned trial Judge while deciding the Us that was before him and out of which this appeal eminates. By impugned order, the learned trial Judge has answered the aforementioned question in affirmative and accordingly made the award rule of Court. The impugned order was rendered on 23-12-96 by 1st ADJ, Ratlam in Civil Suit No. 18-A/88. It is this order which is impugned by the appellants in this appeal filed under Section 39 of the Arbitration Act. To appreciate the grievance urged by the appellants few relevant facts need mention.2. Parties to this appeal (litigation) are real brothers all being sons of late Dhanraj who owned extensive immovable properties. On his death, presumably intest...
Sameeran Roy Vs. Smt. Leena Roy
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-19-2000
Reported in: 2000(4)MPHT269
ORDERDipak Misra, J.1. Marriage has a different concept in Hindu religion and philosophy. It is a sacrament and not a contract. Two souls unite into one and a complete whole is created. The union of two hearts makes marriage a success. A successful marriage is built upon the infrastructure of mutual trust, respect, love, sacrifice and service. Once this infrastructure is shaken or dwindled the equilibrium is disturbed and the relationship between spouses results into one of misery and gives rise to inferior endowments of nature. The private secrets become public and abuses are hurled in law Courts. Tie and the bond become weaker day by day and the protagonists behave as characters of a drama full of emotions which are some times uncontrollable. The case at hand depicts a picture of perverse anger and an attempt to slap the other at the most delicate spot. The couple have converted the Court room to a stage and conceived of dialogues according to their insensitive feelings. The scene is...
National Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Tarabai and ors.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-19-2000
Reported in: 2002ACJ732
A.M. Sapre, J.1. Insurance company has felt aggrieved by two orders passed by the learned Member of Tribunal and has accordingly questioned their legality by filing this one appeal under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act. The impugned orders are dated 4.8.1997 and 3.9.1997, passed by 2nd M.A.C.T., Indore, in Claim Case No. 5 of 1997. In order to appreciate the entire factual controversy involved in the appeal, it is necessary to state the relevant facts.2. Respondent No. 1 is the claimant. She is widow of one Dinesh Joshi who died in an accident that occurred on 14.10.1995 while driving truck bearing No. MP 09-D 7479 near Korba. The respondent No. 1, widow, then on 8.4.1996 made an application under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act before 2nd M.A.C.T., Indore, out of which this appeal arises claiming compensation for the death of her husband. The owner of truck as also the insurance company, appellant herein were arrayed as non-applicants. The respondent No. 1, i.e., claimant also mad...
Procter and Gamble Home Products Ltd. Vs. C.C. and C. Ex.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-10-2000
Reported in: 2001(128)ELT330(MP)
ORDERDipak Misra, J.1. The factual matrix, the questions raised, the points of law urged and the relief claimed being interlinked, both the writ petitions were heard analogously and are disposed of by this common order. For the sake of convenience and clarity the factual matrix in each of the writ petition shall be separately dealt with. As the counsel for the parties addressed this Court in Writ Petition No. 1233/99 at length, I will advert; to the factual backdrop of the said writ petition first.2. Before uncurtaining the factual backdrop it is worthwhile to mention that invoking extraordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India the petitioner in Writ Petition No. 1233/99 has prayed for quashment of the show cause notice, Annexure P-2 dated, 23-12-1998 passed by the Commissioner of Customs and Excise, the sole respondent.3. The facts as have been unfolded are that the petitioner Company is a limited Company under the provisions of the Companies A...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Next ›