Madhya Pradesh Court May 2000 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
R. Rajan Vs. State of M.P.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: May-02-2000
Reported in: 2000(3)MPHT118
ORDERS.S. Saraf, J.1. This petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure has been directed against the judgment dated 14-10-1998 delivered by 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Shahdol in Sessions Trial No. 117/98, whereby strictures have been passed against the petitioner who was Investigating Officer.2. The facts giving rise to this petition are these:-- One Smt. Shivwati @ Shiva was prosecuted for an offence under Sections 302 and 201 Part I of IPC. It was alleged that one Seema was playing in front of her house on the evening of 13-1-1997 and her parents were out of their residence. When her parents returned, they found Seema missing. A search was made and when Seema was not found, a report was lodged in Kotwali, Shahdol which was written in Rojnamcha Sanha pertaining to the missing person. In the next morning the dead body of Seema was found and the matter was again reported to the concerned police. It was alleged that the deceased Seema was died because of attack by so...
Ku. Kalpana Singh Vs. State of M.P. and ors.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: May-02-2000
Reported in: 2000(4)MPHT408; 2000(2)MPLJ599
ORDERBhawani Singh, C.J.1. This Letters Patent Appeal under Clause 10 of the Letters Patent is directed against the Order dated 18-1-2000 passed by the Learned Single Judge, in Writ Petition No. 4616/99, whereby the writ petition has been dismissed.2. Briefly, the material facts of the case may be narrated hereafter. The appellant is seeking direction for declaration of her XIIth Class examination result conducted by the Board of Secondary Education, M.P., Bhopal, through correspondence course and to pay her compensation of Rs. 50,000/- on account of humiliation, harassment and mental agony.3. The appellant submitted examination form for 12th Class Board Examination to be conducted by the Board of Secondary Education, M.P., Bhopal, for academic session 1998-99. She alleges that after scrutiny of form, she was allowed Admission Card, allotted the Roll No. 27186309 and appeared in the examination. The respondents did not declare her result despite several representations. By communicatio...
Rahish Mohammad Qureshi and Others Vs. State of M.P. and Others
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: May-01-2000
Reported in: 2001(1)MPHT123
ORDERS.P. Srivastava, J.1. The controversy involved and the questions raised in both the aforesaid writ petitions are identical and on the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, these writ petitions are being disposed of by a common order.2. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioners as well as the learned Govt. Advocate representing the respondent Nos. 1 to 3 on advance notice and have carefully perused the record.3. The petitioners feels aggrieved by the order dated 5-4-2000 passed by the Commissioner, Gwalior in compliance of the directions issued by this Court in its judgment and order dated 22-12-1999 of the Division Bench disposing of W.P. No. 1678/98 (Smt. Arti Bhatnagar and others v. State of M.P. and others) and the connected Writ Petition No. 1477/98 (Man Singh and others v. State of M.P. and others).4. It may be noticed that the select list in question had been challenged on various grounds including the ground that the Selection Committee whi...
Hemraj and anr. Vs. State of M.P.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: May-01-2000
Reported in: II(2000)DMC415
S.P. Khare, J. 1. Appellants Hemraj and Subhadrabai have been convicted under Sections 498A and 306, I.P.C., and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 and sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for two years, ten years, and two years respectively. They have also been sentenced to pay a fine of Rs. 1,000/-, Rs. 5,000/-, and Rs. 5,000/- each for these offences. The substantive sentences have been ordered to run consecutively.2. Deceased Purnabai was married to appellant Hemraj about three years before her death. Her dead body was recovered from the well behind the house of the accused in village Pusli on 12.11.1997. Appellant Subhadrabai is her mother-in-law. Purnabai lived in the house of her husband for about an year from the date of her marriage and then she was with her parents in village Dharni for about two years. She had come to the house of her husband 15 days before her death as his grand-mother had died. Sodhu (P.W. 6) is father, Dudhnath (P.W. 11) is brother and Phulwati (P...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Next ›