Madhya Pradesh Court October 2000 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Jagdish Chandra Khandelwal Vs. Smt. Kulveer Kaur
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-04-2000
Reported in: 2001(3)MPHT418; 2001(2)MPLJ361
ORDERFakhruddin, J. 1. This revision petition is directed against the order passed by the Rent Controlling Authority, Gwalior dated 21-6-1999, in Case No. 37/86-87/907, whereby the Authority directed that the tenant (non-applicant before the Authority) shall handover the vacant possession of the suit-property to the landlady/applicant, within a period of two months, failing which, it is open for the landlady/applicant to get the recovery of the possession, in accordance with law. It was further directed that the tenant/non- applicant shall pay the rent atthe rate of Rs. 400/- per month to the landlady/applicant till the date of handing over the possession. By the aforesaid impugned order, the Authority also directed the payment of Rs. 9,600/- to be made to the tenant/non-applicant, as compensation, by the landlady/applicant, at the time of taking over the possession from the tenant.2. The brief facts giving rise to the case arc that the landlady/applicant has a non-residential accommod...
P.S. Metal Works Vs. Rezwan Ali and anr.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-04-2000
Reported in: 2002ACJ1495
Dipak Misra, J.1. Invoking the extraordinary jurisdiction of this court under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India the petitioner has prayed for issue of a writ of certiorari for quashment of order dated 8.6.2000 passed in 9/97/WC/NF by the Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation, Shazanabad, Bhopal.2. The facts as have been unfolded are that the respondent No. 1 claiming himself to be an employee of the petitioner's establishment filed an application under the provisions of Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') contending, inter alia, that he is employed by the petitioner as welder on monthly wages of Rs. 3,000 and while he was discharging his duties on 24.8.1995 in the evening an accident took place by which he sustained serious injuries. He claimed an amount of Rs. 6,03,200 towards compensation from the petitioner. While the main case was pending before the Commissioner, the respondent No. 2 herein, an application was moved on 6.10.1998...
Azeem Vs. Badri Prasad and Others
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-03-2000
Reported in: 2001(2)MPHT135; 2001(2)MPLJ2
ORDERBhawani Singh, C.J. This appeal is directed against the award dated 6-1-1999 passed by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Jabalpur, in Claim Case No. 73/94.1. On 16-6-1990 when the claimant was going towards Adhartal Police Station from his house, truck No. M.P.K. 8965, driven rashly and negligently by the driver, hit the knee of his left leg, as a result of which his leg broke. The case was registered under Sections 279/337 of the Indian Penal Code. The claimant was admitted in the hospital where skin grafting was undertaken. He was helping his father in pushing the hand-cart. Claim for Rs. 2,78,000/- has been made.2. The respondents have stated that the claimant suffered minor bruises and was treated only for a day. He was not earning anything nor he has suffered permanent disablement. The truck was driven slowly and carefully, but the claimant was driving the cycle rashly as a result of which he struck against the truck, fell down and suffered injuries.3. The Insurance Compan...
Manjula and ors. Vs. Bombay Transport Service and ors.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-03-2000
Reported in: 2002ACJ1607
A.K. Gohil, J.1. Claimants-appellants have preferred this appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act for enhancement of compensation against the award dated 13.12.1995 passed by II M.A.C.T., Dhar in Claim Case No. 66 of 1993.2. Facts of the case in brief are that on 9.12.1990 deceased Mahesh was going to Kerwa from Dhamnod on his motor cycle and when he was crossing Sanjay Bridge, respondent No. 2 Rafiq Khan, who was the driver of the truck No. MP 09-3001 drove the truck rashly and negligently and dashed Mahesh resulting in his death. Appellant No. 1 Manjula is widow of the deceased. Appellant Nos. 2 and 3 Nirmala and Pinky are the minor daughters of the deceased. Modilal and Dwarkabai are the father and mother of the deceased Mahesh. All the claimants-appellants filed claim petition before the Claims Tribunal for a claim of Rs. 5,00,000 towards the compensation. The Tribunal by impugned award dated 13.12.1995 awarded a sum of Rs. 1,34,000 towards compensation taking into consi...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next ›