Madhya Pradesh Court March 1999 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Satrupa Vs. Basant Kumar
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-04-1999
Reported in: II(2000)DMC109
S.C. Pandey, J. 1.This is an appeal filed by the wife against the judgment and decree dated 31st of October, 1995 in Civil Suit No. 51-A/94 decided by the learned Special Judge, Marriage and Family Dispute, Sagar. The respondent filed an application under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, registered as Civil Suit No. 51-A/94, against the appellant on the ground of desertion and cruelty.2. The case of the respondent was that after marriage on 9.2.1989 in village Kesli, the appellant came to her matrimonial home at village Chandpur. Thereafter, on 12.2.1989 she went to village Kesli. It was claimed that the respondent and the appellant did not cohabit together as husband and wife for two days when the appellant remained with her at Kesli between the period of 10.2.1989 to 12.2.1989. The respondent claimed that the appellant did not allow sexual contact with her on the ground that she was having manstrul discharge during that period. Thereafter, the appellant was not sent back b...
Bateshi Bai and anr. Vs. Udayraj Singh Baghel and ors.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-04-1999
Reported in: 2001ACJ1034
Dipak Misra, J. 1. In this appeal preferred under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (hereinafter referred to as 'Act') the claimants have called in question the propriety of the award passed by the Second Additional Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Chhindwara, dated 2.5.94, in Claim Case No. 33 of 1991.2. The facts as have been unfolded are that the husband of the claimant-appellant No. 1, Rehemansha was working as a labourer in the truck bearing No. MPJ 7284 owned by respondent No. 1. On 12.2.91, the aforesaid vehicle was driven by respondent No. 2 in a rash and negligent manner as a result of which it met with an accident in which the husband of the appellant No. 1 sustained injuries and ultimately met his end. It has been stated that the vehicle was insured with respondent No. 3, Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. The present appellant No. 1 along with her minor daughter preferred an application for compensation pleading, inter alia, that the deceased was earning Rs. 20 per day a...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Next ›