Madhya Pradesh Court August 1998 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Neeti Bhan Vs. Miss Hill Education Society and ors.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-06-1998
Reported in: 1999(1)MPLJ23
ORDERS.P. Srivastava, J.1. Feeling aggrieved by the order passed by the Management of the 'Miss Hill School' terminating her service, the petitioner who had been employed in that 'school' as an Assistant Teacher has now approached this Court seeking redress praying for the quashing of the order and for her reinstatement in service with full back wages.2. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel representing the respondents.3. In this case the respondent society running and managing the school as well as the Principal of the School and the State of Madhya Pradesh, who have been arrayed as respondents, have filed separate counter-affidavits/returns in opposition to the writ petition.4. The facts in brief, shorn of details and necessary for the disposal of this case lie in a narrow compass. The petitioner is a graduate from Jaipur University. Applications had been invited by the Management running and managing the school from eligible lady candidates hav...
Siyaram and ors. Vs. State of M.P. and ors.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-05-1998
Reported in: AIR1999MP76; 1999(2)MPLJ714
S.P. Srivastava, J.1. Feeling aggrieved by the order passed by the learned single Judge dated 30-9-1994, declining to quash the notification issued under Section 4(1) read with Section 17 of the I , and Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as the Act), the petitioners/appellants have now come up in this Letters Patent Appeal, seeking redress praying for the reversal of the impugned order.2. We have heard the learned counsel for the appellants as well as me learned counsel representing the respondents, and have carefully perused the record.3. The facts in brief, shorn of details and necessary for ihe disposal of this appeal lie in a narrow compass. A notification dated 18-7-1990. issued under Section 4(1) read with Section 17 of the Act, was published in the Madhya Pradesh Gazette dated 10-8-1990, whereunder an area of 26.146 hectares situated in village Joura, district Morcna, was proposed to be acquired for a public purpose showing it to be 'New Housing Policy.'4. Subsequent...
Mehdibai Foujdar Education Society Vs. State of M.P. and ors.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-05-1998
Reported in: 1998(2)MPLJ698
ORDERR.S. Garg, J.1. This order shall dispose of W.P. No. 3351/96 (Mehdibai v. State of M.P. and Ors.) and W.P. No. 4072/97 (Mohd. Ibrahim Khan v. State of M. P. and Ors.).2. Facts necessary for the disposal of the petition are that the petitioner is a registered society under the Societies Registrikaran Adhiniyam, 1973, known as Mehdibai Fouzdar Education Society. The petitioner is engaged in running a school and imparts education through Urdu medium. The petitioner claims to be belonging to minority. The petitioner submits that respondent No. 3, Joint Director, Public Instructions, Narmada Division, Hoshangabad, has entertained appeals of certain employees whose services were terminated from the school by the petitioner society under the provisions of Section 6(a)(iii) and (iv), (b) and (c) of the M. P. Ashaskiya Shikshan Sanstha (Adhyapakon Tatha Anya Karmachariyon Ka Sandaya), Adhiniyam, 1978, (hereinafter referred to as the 1978 Adhiniyam). According to the petitioner, the Joint D...
Raghvendra Prasad Gautam Vs. Union Bank of India and anr.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-04-1998
Reported in: (1998)IILLJ1135MP
ORDERDipak Misra, J.1. Thus spoke H.G. Wells-'Human history becomes more and more a race between education and catastrophe'. Modern Indian reformers of the later part of 18th century possibly felt that modern education would keep at bay the catastrophe caused due to ignorance of modernism, and British Premier, Macaullay, thought it appropriate to make the Indians educated and learned in English as that would open new vistas of knowledge for them. The saying-learning of a language is sometimes a luxury-was not the motto. It was essential for understanding the world in its expanding modernity, perceiving progress in proper perspective, cultivating culture in serene calmness, training oneself in liberalising political thought and observing advancement of science in composed rationality. However, with the change of time, the ideal of establishing a well-affirmed national identity gained ground. Keeping in mind, the idea of enrichment of self-respect and self-dependence, the constitutional ...
Allwyn, a Unit of Voltas Ltd. and ors. Vs. Deputy Labour Commissioner ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-03-1998
Reported in: [2000]100CompCas694(MP); 1999(1)MPLJ195
Dipak Misra, J. 1. Invoking the extraordinary jurisdiction of this court the petitioner, an industrial concern, has challenged the sustainability of the orders passed by the Deputy Labour Commissioner, Indore, respondent No. 1 herein, on December 7, 1997 (annexure P-l), and order dated August 12, 1997, {annexure P-2), whereby the said authority has directed the Collector, Bhopal to recover a sum of Rs. 4,67,286.95 as land revenue.2. A brief reference to the factual matrix would suffice. The petitioner, Hyderabad Allwyn Ltd., became sick and had accumulated a loss of Rs. 180 crores as on March 31, 1993. The matter was referred to the Board for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction (in short 'BIFR') under the provisions of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'). The Board in its meeting held in January, 1993, appointed the Industrial Development Bank of India as the operating agency to prepare the rehabilitation scheme. The G...
Rameshwari Devi and ors. Vs. State of M.P.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-03-1998
Reported in: II(1998)DMC672
J.G. Chitre, J.1. This revision petition assails the order which has been Passed by the Addl. Sessions Judge, Indore in Sessions Trial No. 362/92 dated 22.6.1998 by which the learned trial Judge has rejected the prayer made by the petitioners for exemption in context with the attendance before the Court at the time of trial.2. The matter revolves around a short point which needs to be adjudicated and, therefore, with the consent of the parties, this revision petition is decided a the motion hearing stage itself.3. The petitioners are facing a prosecution since 1991 and as submitted by Mr. Jaisingh, they are attending the Court at lndore from Village Chakla, P.S. Jahangirabad Pilakhwa P.S. Pilakhwa, District Ghaziabad and Lakhxar, PS Lakhxar, Distrct Haridwar, all situated in Uttar Pradesh. The prosecution has alleged that the wife of the co-accused Rajiv committed suicide at Indore. The petitioner Nos. 1 and happened to be the parents of said Rajiv Petitioner No. 3 happens to be the si...
Rameshwari Devi and ors. Vs. the State
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-03-1998
Reported in: 1998CriLJ4339
ORDERJ.G. Chitre, J.1. This revision petition assails the order which has been passed by the Addl. Sessions Judge, Indore in Sessions trial No. 362/92 dated 22-6-98 by which, the learned Trial Judge has rejected the prayer made by the petitioners for exemption in context with the attendance before the Court at the time of trial.2. The matter revolves around a short point which needs to be adjudicated and, therefore, with the consent of the parties, this revision petition is decided at the motion hearing stage itself.3. The petitioners are facing a prosecution since 1991 and as submitted by Shri Jaisingh, they are attending the Court at Indore from village Chakla, P.S. Jahangirabad, PilakhwaPS Pilakhwa District Gaziabad and Lakhxar, PS Lakhxar District Haridwar, all situate in Uttar Pradesh. The prosecution has alleged that the wife of the co-accused Rajiv committed suicide at Indore. The petitioner No. 1 and 2 happen to be the parents of said Rajiv. Petitioner No. 3 happens to be the s...
Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Mulayam Bai and ors.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-03-1998
Reported in: 1999ACJ727; 1998(2)MPLJ33
S.C. Pandey, J.1. Counsel for the applicant/ petitioner is heard on the question of admission.2. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that there is omission in the impugned order dated 9.7.1998, passed in Civil Revision No. 83 of 1998 because it was not put to the court that the Licensing Authority, Alwar is also sought to be examined for proving that no such licence was issued by it as was sought to be proved by the driver of the vehicle. The learned Counsel for the applicant/petitioner does not dispute the fact that the licensing authority itself has issued a certificate to the effect that no such licence, as filed in the case by the driver of the vehicle, exists in the record of the Licensing Authority, Alwar. Such a certificate is admissible in evidence as a public document under Section 74(1)(iii) of the Evidence Act. The certificate is the record of the act done by the public officer, who has found, after examining itself its own record, that the licence does not exist. This...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- Next ›