Madhya Pradesh Court January 1997 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Manwani Steels (P) Ltd. and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-13-1997
Reported in: 1997(70)LC250(MP)
ORDERN.K. Jain, J.1. This order shall dispose of all the four aforesaid petitions made under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India.2. Briefly stated the facts common to all these petitions are that the petitioners are partnership firms carrying on business of manufacturing twisted bars falling under Chapter 72 of the Central Excise and Tariff Act. The respondent No. 2, after show-cause notice passed identical orders dated 5.8.1993 (Annexure P/9 in the petitions No. 2074/93, 2106/93 and 2126/93 and P/8 in petition No. 2183/93) against the petitioners demanding a particular sum as excise duty and also imposing penalty with a direction to confiscate the seized goods with liberty to obtain redemption on payment of fine. These orders are challenged in these petitions on the ground that the petitioners are illegally denied the benefit of the exemption available through Notifications 90/88 and 202/88.3. The respondents have filed the returns opposing the petitions and taken preliminary...
Bandhan Vs. State of M.P.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-10-1997
Reported in: II(1997)DMC19
S.K. Kulshrestha, J.1. The appellant has preferred this appeal against the judgment dated 20.11.1987 of the learned Second Additional Sessions Judge, Ambikapur, in Sessions Trial No. 59/87, by which he has been convicted for offences punishable under Sections 302 and 201 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced, respectively, to imprisonment for life and R.I. for 7 years; both sentences to run concurrently. Co-accused Heera son of Dhani has also preferred a separate appeal being Criminal Appeal No. 1274/87 against his conviction recorded in the said judgment for offence under Section 201,1.P.C. and sentence of 7 years' R.I. awarded to him thereunder. Both the appeals are, therefore, being disposed of by this common judgment.2. The two appellants were prosecuted for offences under Sections 302 and 201 of the Indian Penal Code, alternatively under Section 302 read with Section 34, I.P.C. and Section 201 of the Indian Penal Code for the murder of Kuntibai, wife of the appellant Bandhan, and...
Manoj Singh @ Vishvanath Singh Vs. State of M.P.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-10-1997
Reported in: I(1999)DMC47
D.M. Dharmadhikari, J.1. The appellant has been convicted under Section 302, Indian Penal Code and sentenced to life imprisonment by judgment dated 4th August, 1992 of 3rd Additional Sessions Judge, Bilaspur for committing murder of his wife Malti Singh on 27th March, 1991.2. The factual background of the commission of the crime as brought out in the evidence produced by the prosecution is as under :The accused was living with his wife separately from other members of the family, in village Torva. According to Smt. Devki Singh (PW 1) wife of Deepak Singh (PW 3 brother of the accused), the accused came to her at about 9.00 or 10.00 a.m. to tell her at the house of Mrs. Banerjee where the former had gone for a visit, that health of his wife has gone bad (Malti Ki Tabiyat Kharab Ho Gai Hai), When witness Smt. Devki Singh (PW 1) went to the house of the accused, she found that the deceased was lying on a bed and her husband (PW 3) Deepak Singh had called an auto-riksha for taking her to th...
Gyaso Bai and anr. Vs. Mahendra Singh and ors.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-09-1997
Reported in: 1999ACJ1594
Tej Shankar, J.1. This appeal arising out of claim petition filed by the appellants Gyaso Bai and Pratap Singh raises a short question.2. It appears that on 23.9.1991 the deceased Kamal Singh was going on the tractor-trolley Nos. HMT 3511 and 6167 to offer prayer at Karehwale Baba. Other persons were also sitting in the trolley which belonged to respondent No. 2. It was being driven by respondent No. 1 Mahendra Singh. The respondent No. 3 was the insurer. On the way, at the curve of Girwai Naka due to rash and negligent driving of the driver the tractor-trolley overturned as a result of which Kamal Singh died. A report was lodged at P.S. Janak Ganj, Gwalior and a case was got registered. Kamal Singh was a student of 12th class at the time of his death. The claimants being parents of the deceased claimed a total sum of Rs. 8,52,000 as compensation. The defendant Nos. 1 and 2 absented and the case was contested by the insurance company, defendant No. 3. The defendant admitted the acciden...
In Re: Nilnita Chemicals Ltd.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-06-1997
Reported in: [1999]96CompCas66(MP)
Deepak Verma, J. 1. The petitioner-company has filed this petition under Section 391 read with Section 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'), for sanctioning the scheme of amalgamation with another company known as Nirma Ltd. The petitioner-company shall hereinafter be referred to as N. C. L., i.e., the transferor-company and Nirma Ltd., shall be referred to as N. L., i.e., the transferee-company. In the said petition, prayer has also been made for fixing date, time and place for calling the meetings of shareholders and creditors of N. C. L., the transferor-company, and to appoint a chairman for calling such meetings.2. This court passed an order on February 3, 1995, appointing Madam Vandana Kasrekar, advocate, as chairperson to convene the meetings as mentioned above.3. Accordingly, Madam Vandana Kasrekar acting as chairman, convened meetings of shareholders, secured and unsecured creditors of the company on March 11, 1995, at its registered office. As ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- Next ›