Madhya Pradesh Court September 1994 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Dr. Dharmendra Jhavar Vs. State of M.P. and anr.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-01-1994
Reported in: AIR1995MP97; 1995(0)MPLJ233
ORDERA.R. Tiwari, J.1. This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.2. The petitioner claims that he was eligible and entitled for being placed in the waiting list for Second Counselling and on superior merit seeks issuance of writ for his admission in P. G. Medical Course M. S. General Surgery in MGM Medical College, Indore via creation of additional seat or in Medical Course M. D. Medicine on the seat vacated or abandoned by Dr. Sudhir Mungi on movement to foreign Country for further study.3. Facts are jejeune. The petitioner obtained MBBS degree in I Division with eleventh position in merit list (Annexure P/1). Internship and Registration are evidenced by Annexure P/2 and P/3. He appeared in PPG (Second) entrance examination in January, 94 and secured 478 marks out of 900 i.e. 53.1.% (Annexure P/4). In waiting list, he was positioned at serial No. 15. On 7-4-94 in pursuance of Letter dated 7-3-94 (Annexure P/5) he appeared at Bhopai for counselling. On interview...
Bhoomandal Singh Vs. State of M.P. and ors.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-01-1994
Reported in: 1997(1)MPLJ547
ORDERT.S. Doabia, J.1. This is a petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. This writ petition should succeed on the short ground that the State took almost one year to decide as to whether the land belonging to the petitioner should be acquired or not but did not think it proper to afford hearing under Section 5A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as the Act') to the land owner. The petition arises out of the following facts.2. The petitioner is the owner of the land. His land was sought to be acquired for providing an approach road to a Kabristan. For this purpose, the Municipal Council made a request to the State Government for acquiring the land under Section 4 of the Act for the benefit of the Municipal Council (hereinafter referred to as the 'Council'). In this petition it has been stated the Council felt the necessity of this land in the year 1983 but the final order with a view to acquire the land was taken in 1985. The averments m...
Taramati Nandkishore Sharma Vs. Cantonment Board and anr.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-01-1994
Reported in: 1995(0)MPLJ159
ORDERA.R. Tiwari, J.1. This order shall also govern the disposal of connected petitions M.P. No. 1078/93 - Smt. Prabha Rathore v. The Cantonment Board and another; M.P. No. 1365/93 - Mrs. R. Amit v. The Cantonment Board and another; M. P. No. 1015/93 - Smt. Shakuntala Shrivas v. The Cantonment Board; and M. P. No. 1414/94 - Smt. Dulari Jaiswal v. The Cantonment Board and another.2. In all these petitions, the core question involved is whether petitioners, teachers/lecturers, in school managed by the Cantonment Board, Mhow (Respondent No. 1) are liable to be superannuated at the age of 58 years or whether they are entitled to continue till attainment of the age of 60 or 62 years and alternatively whether the Officer Commanding-in-Chief, Lucknow (respondent No. 2) is under obligation to sanction retention in service in terms of Rule 22(1) of the Cantonment Fund Servants Rules, 1937 (for short, 'Rules'), framed under Section 280 of the Cantonment Act, 1924 (for short, 'Act') till the atta...
Rajesh Amarsinh Rajpoot Vs. State of M.P.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-01-1994
Reported in: 1995(0)MPLJ831
ORDERJ.G. Chitre, J.1. Heard Shri R. S. Kushwaha counsel for the petitioner. Shri Desai Dy. G. A. for the State.The present applicant is facing prosecution for offences punishable under Sections 420, 467, 468 of Indian Penal Code which was being investigated into by police Kotwali, Ujjain. The applicant was arrested on 3-5-1994 in respect of Crime No. 86/94. The charge sheet has been filed in the Court of Judicial Magistrate, First Class Ujjain on 10-8-1994. The applicant accused had moved an application for bail before the same Court on 8-8-1994. The learned Magistrate posted that application for hearing on 9-8-1994. On 9-8-1994 the argument was heard and the matter was posted for decision on 10-8-1994. Meanwhile the investigating agency submitted the charge sheet against the present applicant on 10-8-1994. On 10-8-1994 the learned Magistrate passed an order rejecting the bail application of the applicant by holding that the bail application has been dismissed as charge-sheet has been...
Babloo Alias Sujeet Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-01-1994
Reported in: 1995CriLJ3534
D.P.S. Chauhan, J.1. Appellant Babloo alias Sujeet, after having been convicted in S. T. No. 195/91 under Section 307, I.P.C., wherein he was awarded R. I. for 5 years together with a fine of Rs. 500/- and under Section 324, I.P.C. for causing injuries to two persons, namely Motilal and Ganesh and sentenced to 4-4 months' R. I. on the said counts together with a fine of Rs. 100-100/-, approached this Court by means of present appeal for setting aside the conviction and sentence.2. The appellant is resident of village Madhia. district Sagar and appears to be a religious person as the occurrence in question look place when theappellant, complainant Shuilendra, Motilal and Ganesh were participating in a Keertan. The alleged incident took place on 24th August, 1990 in village Madhia during the night hours while the Keertan at the resident of Rama (P.W. 10) was going on. The report of the occurrence was lodged by Shailendra (P.W. 11) at about 2.00 a.m. in the night the same day at P.S. Cant...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Next ›