Madhya Pradesh Court May 1989 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Devendra Kumar Kesharvani Vs. Satyanarayan Singh Thakur and ors.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: May-02-1989
Reported in: 1990MPLJ168
ORDERY.B. Suryavanshi, J.1. The petitioner Devendra Kumar in this petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is challenging the legality of the impugned orders, dated 7-5-1989 (Annexure-I), passed by the Addl. Collector, Sagar in appeal No. 19-B/128-year 1985-86 holding, that on scrutiny of the nomination paper of Devendra Kumar on 17-10-1985 it was found that he was not holding licences from the Market Committee for a period of two successive years as required under section 11 (i)(b) of the M. P. Krishi Upaj Mandi Adhiniyam, 1973 (hereinafter, called the Adhiniyam), Act No. 24/73, because he held licences only for the year 1984-85, and not for the year 1983-84, though he had subsequently obtained a licence for the year 1985-86. He was ineligible for election and accordingly, his election to the Market Committee of the said Mandi has been declared illegal and void.2. Chapter III of the Adhiniyam relates to constitution of Market Committees. Section 7 of the Adhiniyam ...