Madhya Pradesh Court April 1989 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ramlalli Vs. Soneylal
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-10-1989
Reported in: I(1990)DMC518
S. Awasthy, J.1. This appeal has been directed against the judgment dated the 6th May, 1987, passed by the Fourth Additional Judge to the Court of District Judge, Jabalpur in Civil Suit No. 82-A of 1984, granting a decree of divorce.2. The appellant was married to the respondent in the year 1969. A daughter Kumari Maya and a son were born to them during their wedlock. The son has died during the period the appellant (herein) was serving the jail sentence for causing the murder of her mother-in-law on 8-3-1980.3. The respondent had filed a petition under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') on the ground of cruelty as well as desertion. The trial Court found the allegation of cruelty proved, while the ground of desertion was held not proved.4. It is well settled that the desertion must be with intention to leave the matrimonial home for good. In the present case, it is not so. The appellant has been made to remain away from her husband due to the o...
Balkishan S/O Kanhiyalal Vs. Nagar Palika Nigam
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-10-1989
Reported in: 1991(0)MPLJ573
ORDERK.M. Agarwal, J.1. This is a revision by the owner of a building against assessment of property tax by the non-applicant.2. The applicant is the owner of a double storied building situated in Daulatganj, Lashkar, i.e. within the limits of Municipal Corporation, Gwalior (in short, the 'Corporation'). By a notification published in M. P. Rajpatra dated 12-12-1980, the Corporation proposed to have survey for the purpose of assessment of each part of the city for the purpose of property tax in accordance with Section 143(3) of the M. P. Municipal Corporation Act, 1956 (in short, the 'Act'). Accordingly in January 1983 proceedings were initiated for assessment of property tax in respect of the locality in which the applicant's aforesaid building was located. On the basis of the report by the Property Tax Inspector of the Corporation annual letting value of the building was assessed at Rs. 6,480/- by the Property Tax Officer, by treating monthly rent of the ground floor to be Rs. 250/- ...
Chhaganlal H. Mittal Vs. Commissioner of Sales Tax
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-06-1989
Reported in: [1989]74STC290(MP)
G.G. Sohani, Ag. C.J.1. By this reference under Section 44(1) of the M.P. General Sales Tax Act, 1958 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'), the Board of Revenue has referred the follo ing question of law to this Court for its opinion :Whether, in the facts and circumstances of the case, the Tribunal as justified in holding that conversion of G.I. ires into G.I. barbed ires as a process of manufacture and G.I. barbed ires ere commercial commodity other than G.I. ires and ere not covered by item No. (xv) of Clause (iv) of Section 14 of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 ?2. The material facts giving rise to this reference, briefly, are as follows :The assessee is engaged in the manufacture of G.I. barbed ire. The assessee as assessed to tax under the Act for the period from 8th November, 1980 to 27th October, 1981. The turnover of the assessee on account of G.I. barbed ire as determined at Rs. 50,602. The sales made to the Government Departments amounted to Rs. 42,977 and the balance as a...
Munna Singh Tomar Vs. State of M.P.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-04-1989
Reported in: 1990CriLJ49; 1989MPLJ414
K.K. Varma, J.1. In Criminal Miscellaneous case No. 14 of 1989, Munna Singh Tomar v. The State of M.P., the learned single Judge, R. C. Lahoti, J., referred two questions of law for determination by a Division Bench, Hon'ble the Chief Justice has constituted a Division Bench for answering the questions which are as follows :--(i) Whether in view of the dictum of the Apex Court in Shahzad Hasan Khan v. Ishtiaq Hasan Khan, AIR 1987 SC 1613 : (1987 Cri LJ 1872) a subsequent application for bail should be placed for hearing before the same Judge be for whom an earlier application for bail of the same applicant was dismissed as not pressed, so long as he is available.(ii) Would it make any difference if the earlier application for bail dismissed withdrawn or not pressed was at the stage of motion hearing and/or before a Vacation Judge?'.2. The context is as follows :Applicant Munna Singh Tomar filed a bail application under Section 439, Cr.P.C. in the High Court on 19-12-1988. The case was ...
Dhar Cement Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-04-1989
Reported in: 1991(54)ELT178(MP)
ORDERA.G. Qureshi J.1. This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus and for incidental and consequential relief against the respondents, on the ground that the respondents have wrongly withdrawn the rebate in Central Excise duty to which the mini cement plant of the petitioner No. 1 company is entitled.2. The petitioner No. 1 M/s. Dhar Cement Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the Company) is a public limited company duly registered with the Registrar of Companies M.P. Gwalior under the Companies Act, 1956 and has its registered office at 50, Sitlamata Bazar, Indore, The Company is carrying on the business of manufacture of cement in its mini cement plant situated at village Karondiya, District Dhar, M.P. The petitioner No. 2 is one of the promoters as well as share holder of the Company and has also been appointed its Managing Director. According to the petitioners, on the representation, assurances and pr...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- Next ›