Madhya Pradesh Court March 1989 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Latabai and anr. Vs. Vedprakash and ors.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-02-1989
Reported in: 1990ACJ594
R.K. Varma, J. 1. This is an appeal filed by the claimants, namely, surviving widow and minor daughter of the deceased Amritlal, against the award dated 1.5.1984 made by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Jhabua in Claim Case No. 35 of 1983 whereby the learned Tribunal has awarded Rs. 30,000/- as compensation in respect of the death of the deceased as a result of a motor accident caused due to rash and negligent driving of the truck bearing registration No. UTG 6209 owned by the respondent No. 1 and driven by the respondent No. 2, the respondent No. 3, insurance company, being the insurer in respect of the vehicle at the material time.2. The facts giving rise to this appeal, briefly stated, are as follows:During the night intervening between 29.4.1983 and 30.4.1983 while the deceased Amritlal was driving the tanker bearing registration No. MBF 914 on Indore-Baroda Road, the offending truck bearing registration No. UTG 6209, being driven rashly and negligently by the respondent No. 2,...
Latabai and anr. Vs. Vedparkash and ors.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-02-1989
Reported in: I(1991)ACC166; (1991)L.R.1I.A.166
R.K. Varma, J.1. This is an appeal filed by the claimants, namely, surviving widow and minor daughter of the deceased Amritlal, against the award dated 1.5.1984 made by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Jhabua in Claim Case No. 35 of 1983 whereby the learned Tribunal has awarded Rs. 30, 000/- as compensation in respect of the death of the deceased as a result of a motor accident caused due to rash and negligent driving of the truck bearing registration No. UTG 6209 owned by the respondent No. 1 and driven by the respondent No. 2, the respondent No. 3, insurance company, being the insurer in respect of the vehicle at the material lime.2. The facts giving rise to this appeal, briefly staled, are as follows:During the night intervening between 29.4.1983 and 30.4.1983 while the deceased Amritlal was driving the tanker bearing registration No. MBF 914 on Indore-Baroda Road, the offending truck bearing registration No. UTG 6209, being driven rashly and negligently by the respondent No. 2,...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next ›