Madhya Pradesh Court May 1988 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Smt. Radhabai Vs. Arjundas
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: May-03-1988
Reported in: AIR1989MP73; 1988MPLJ342
ORDERK.L. Shrivastava, J. 1. This revision petition Under Section 23-E of the M. P. Accommodation Control Act, 1961 (for short 'the Act') is directed against the order dated 14-7-87 passed by the Rent Controlling Authority, Indore (for short 'the authority').2. Circumstances giving rise to this petition are these. Smt. Radhabai, the petitioner on 15-1-86 filed an application Under Section 23-A of the Act against the non-applicant before the authority for his eviction from the accommodation situate at Indore. She had let out the same to him after her widowhood.3. By the impugned order the learned Authority has held that the application has to be transferred to the Civil Court of competent jurisdiction on the ground that the petitioner is not included in the category of the 'landlord' contemplated in Section 23-J of the Act as the accommodation had been let out to the non-applicant after she had become a widow. Reliance for this view was placed on the decision in Badri Prasad's case (198...
Bapu Singh Vs. Pyaribai and ors.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: May-03-1988
Reported in: (1990)IILLJ311MP
K.L. Srivastava, J. 1. This appeal under Section 30 of the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 (for short 'the Act') is against the award dated 10th December 1982 made by the Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation, Indore.2. It is not in dispute that the deceased Gumansingh, husband of the respondent No. 1 and the father of respondent Nos. 2 and 3, was employed as an agricultural labourer by the appellant in his farm which has a well fitted with an electric motor. It was on 27th June 1977 at about 8.30 P.M. that deceased Gumansingh received electric shock there and died in consequence.3. The respondents filed an application for compensation alleging that the death of Gumansingh occurred due to employment injury received during the course of employment and claimed Rs.11,520/- as compensation under the Act.4. The appellant resisted the application contending that Gumanshingh's employment is not governed by Clause (xxix) of Schedule II of the Act.5. The learned Commissioner relying on the D...
Haji Abdul Sattar Vs. M.P. State Minor Forest Produce (Trading and Dev ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: May-02-1988
Reported in: AIR1989MP70a; 1988MPLJ810
ORDER1. The order of the Court was delivered by C.P. Sen. J. -- By this Order Misc. Petition Nos. 516. 517, 518, 522, 523. 561, 570, 575, 592, 593. 727, 728, 741. 745, 781, 783, 801, 837 and 878, all of 1988, are also disposed of as similar questions are involved and all these petitions were heard together. The petitioners are aggrieved by rejection of their tenders and want to challenge the same as being arbitrary and discriminatory.2. The M. P. Tendu Patta (Vyapar Viniyaman) Adhiniyam, 1964, was enacted to make provision for regulating in the public interest the trade of Tendu leaves by creation of State monopoly in such trade. Tendu trees are in abundance in the State and Tendu leaves are natural growth. There is a fresh flush of Tendu leaves in each year from April and new and better crop can be obtained by process of pruning to be completed by 15th March. Under Section 4(1) of the Adhiniyam, the State Government has been empowered to appoint agents for the purpose of purchase of, ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- Next ›