Madhya Pradesh Court February 1987 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Dadamchand Vs. Ramcharansingh Rathode and ors.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-04-1987
Reported in: 1988CriLJ1506
ORDERK.L. Shrivastava, J.1. This revision petition is directed against the order dated 24-4-84 passed by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Thandla in Criminal Case No. 0/83 whereby the petitioner's complaint under Sections 120B, 175, 181, 182 and 500 IPC has been dismissed for want of sanction.2. Non-applicants 1 to 3 are police officers,3. According to the complaint, Popatkumar son of the complainant Dadamchand was the Secretary of the Thandla Vyapari Sangh' and in the year 1980 the 'Sangh' had indulged in strike against police atrocities. Non-applicant No. 1 the Station House Officer had, therefore, become annoyed with the petitioner and his son and wanted to implicate him in some false case. Head Constable Madho Singh non-applicant No. 2 and Circle Inspector Mohammad Fazal Khan were then attached to the police station Thandla.4. When a report under Section 406 IPC was received against the complainant at P.S. Thandla, he applied for anticipatory bail. The police then reported that...
Smt. Shobha Kshirsagar Vs. Smt. Janki Kshirsagar and anr.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-02-1987
Reported in: AIR1987MP145; 1988MPLJ28
T.N. Singh, J. 1. For the determination of the ticklish question of law that has surfaced in this case, no close parallel on facts being found in any reported decision, hearing of this appeal has unfortunately staggered and disposal delayed.2. Contenders for guardianship in this case are threesome, albeit in two proceedings, and the wards also are threesome. The mother alone made an application under the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890, for short GWA, for declaration that she was the guardian of the person and property of her sons, Deepak, Dhananjay and Abhay, while another application was made a few days later for the same purpose jointly by the paternal grandmother of the children along with her daughter. Hearing of the two applications was consolidated. Because the other application was allowed and her application was dismissed, the mother has preferred the instant appeal impugning the decision rendered against her in the common judgment disposing of the two applications.3. Narayanrao...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Next ›