Madhya Pradesh Court May 1985 Judgments
Central Coalfields Ltd. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and ors.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: May-03-1985
Reported in: AIR1986MP33a; 1986MPLJ255
B.M. Lal, J.1. This petition under Arts. 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, is directed against the order dt. 4-5-81 (Annexure-F), order dt. 30-9-81 (Annexure-J) and order dt. 9-6-82 (Annexure-K), passed by the Chairman, Special Area Development Authority (hereinafter referred to as 'SADA'), Singrauli, District Sidhi, Madhya Pradesh, for seeking directions that the provisions of Madhya Pradesh Nagar Tatha Gram Nivesh Adhiniyam, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Adhiniyam'), are not applicable to the petitioner's property situated in Sidhi District (M.P.).2. Short facts leading to this petition are as under : The petitioner is a subsidiary company of Coal India Limited. This Company, according to the petitioner, is a Government owned company, wholly financed and controlled by the Government of India and is registered under the Indian Companies Act, 1956. This Company, previously was known as National Coal Development Corporation limited. But, this name has been changed and no...
Tag this Judgment!Smt. Sadhana Agrawal and ors. Vs. Indore Development Authority, Indore ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: May-01-1985
Reported in: AIR1986MP88; 1985MPLJ616
R.K. Varma, J.1. This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India filed by the petitioner who have made a grievance against the arbitrary dealings of the Indore Development Authority vis a vis the petitioners and others who are the prospective purchasers of (sic) in Navlakha Complex constructed by the Indore Development Authority in its Scheme No. 31.2. The petitioners have stated in the opening paragraph of their petition that they have filed this petition not only in their presonal capacity as aggrieved parties but also in the capacity of representatives of over 100 other persons aggrieved by the very same conduct/decision/orders of Indore Development Authority, who attended and participated in meetings of such persons as per list Appendix 'A' appended to the petition and have desired to file and support the petition and also in the capacity of responsible citizens agitating against wrongs by a public body and authority, in the public interest. The petitioners have p...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- Next ›