Madhya Pradesh Court October 1980 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Bhure Vs. Gomatibai
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-07-1980
Reported in: 1981CriLJ789
ORDERM.D. Bhatt, J.1. The applicant-husband, being aggrieved by the trial Magistrate's Order dated 2-9-78, passed under Section 125(3) of the Cr. P.C. directing his imprisonment for a period of 12 months due to his default in payment of maintenance amount, has preferred the revision against the same,2. Consequent to the Magistrate's Order dated 10-1-76 granting monthly maintenance to the non-applicant wife and the child, at the rate of Rs. 150/-in total, from the date of the application for maintenance, the non-applicant wife moved the Court for enforcement of the maintenance Order in the matter of recovery of the arrears of maintenance amount of Rs. 3,000/-. The applicant husband, after avoiding his appearance for long, finally appeared and apprised the Court that he did not want to pay any maintenance amount and nor would he pay the same, (see Order-sheet dated 30-9-77). Considering the recalcitrant attitude of the applicant-husband, the learned Magistrate, vide the Order impugned be...
Jhalkan Singh and anr. Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-06-1980
Reported in: 1981CriLJ1230
ORDERM.D. Bhat, J.1. The applicant-accused Jhalkansingh having been convicted under Section 39 of the Indian Electricity Act read with Section 379 of the IPC and the other applicant-accused Sumer, having been convicted under Section 39 of the Electricity Act read with Section 379/109 of the I.P.C. and each having been sentenced to pay the fine of Rs. 250/- and in default of fine, one month's S.I. by both the Courts below, present revision is now preferred against the same.2. On 14-1-1976. meter reader Bhandari hd gone to the tube well of the applicant-accused Jhalkansingh. In the cover of the meter, a hole was found and one wooden piece was found inserted and meter at that time was not recording the consumption of energy, although the tube well, at the relevant time, was in operation. At the relevant time. Jhalkansingh was not present, but the other applicant-accused Sumer was present who took out the inserted piece of wood and threw it away. Seizures were duly made and on the written ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- Next ›