Madhya Pradesh Court June 1979 Judgments
Gopaldas Vs. Buddhsaram
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-27-1979
Reported in: AIR1980MP123; 1980MPLJ258
ORDERA.R. Navkar, J.1. This is a revision petition under Section 25 of the Provincial Small Cause Courts Act (hereinafter referred to as the Act) against the order dated 22-8-1975, passed by the Civil Judge, Class I, Shivpuri in Miscellaneous Civil Case No. 3/74, dismissing the application of the defendant/petitioner for setting aside the ex parte decree.2, The plaintiff/non-petitioner obtained an ex parte decree against the defendant/petitioner on 26-7-1974 in Small Cause Suit No. 785 of 1972. The defendant/petitioner moved an application under Order 9, Rule 13 of the Code of Civil Procedure for setting aside the said ex parte decree. The ground taken for setting aside the decree was that nis uncle was ailing on that date and he had to go to Lashkar to see him in the hospital. Along withthat application, the petitioner/defendant filed a security bond for the due performance of the decree, but it remained unverified. The trial Court registered the application as Miscellaneous Case No. ...
Tag this Judgment!The Bhopal Sugar Industries Ltd. and anr. Vs. the Union of India (Uoi) ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-25-1979
Reported in: AIR1979MP163
G. P. Singh, C.J. 1. Petitioner No. 1, namely, The Bhopal Sugar Industries Limited, Sehore, is a public limited company constituted under the Companies Act, 1956, petitioner No. 2 is the constituted attorney and factory manager of the petitioner company. The petitioner company has a factory situate at Sehore in the State of Madhya Pradesh for manufacture of sugar by vacuum pan process. By this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution, the petitioners challenge the validity of the Sugar (Price Determination for 1977-78 Production) Order, 1977, in relation to the State of Madhya Pradesh. By an amendment, the petitioners also challenge the validity of the Sugar (Price Determination for 1977-78 Production) Amendment Order, 1978, which was made during the pendency of the petition. These orders remained operative till 16th August 1978 when sugar was completely decontrolled.2. Section 3(1) of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') confers power on the...
Tag this Judgment!Brij Gopal Denga and ors. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and anr.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-25-1979
Reported in: AIR1979MP173; 1978MPLJ70
G.P. Singh, C.J.1. This order shall also dispose of Misc, Petition No. 396 of 1977.2. The petitioners in both these petitions which are filed under Article 226 of the Constitution, challenged the constitutional validity of Sub-sections (2) and (3) of Section 19-C of the Madhya Pradesh Co-operative Societies Act, 19.60, hereinafter referred to as the Act.3. Petitioner No. 1 in Misc. Petition No. 342 of 1977 is a citizen of India. Petitioners 2 and 3 in this petition are co-operative societies registered under the provisions of the Act. Petitioner No. 1 is a member of these societies. He is also a member of some other cooperative societies of Chhatarpur District. By order dated 23rd June 1977, passed under Sub-sections (2) and (3) of Section 19-C of the Act, the Registrar, Co-operative Societies, expelled the petitioner No. 1 from all the societies of which he was a member for a period of five years.4. The petitioner in Misc. Petition No. 396 of 1977 was a member of four co-operative soc...
Tag this Judgment!Smt. Mainabai Gour Vs. Controller of Estate Duty
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-25-1979
Reported in: [1980]122ITR650(MP); 1979MPLJ711
G.P. Singh,C.J.1. This is a reference under section 64(1) of the Estate Duty Act, 1953 (hereinafter referred to as ' the Act'), referring for our answer the following questions of law :' (1) Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and on a correct interpretation of Section 27(1) of the Estate Duty Act, 'married daughters ' of the deceased are covered by the definition of ' relative' in Section 27(7)(i)(b) of the Act as being included in the term ' children ' used in that section ? (2) Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in holding that the admission of the two married daughters to a share of profits of the business of the deceased under the style of M/s. Ramchandra Badri Prasad amounted to a ' gift' within the meaning of Section 27(1) of the Act ? (3) Whether the share of profit earned by the daughters subsequent to November 17, 1963 (date of their admission as partners in the said business), constituted ' property ' wit...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- Next ›