Madhya Pradesh Court May 1979 Judgments
State of M.P. and ors. Vs. Smt. Sugandhi and ors.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: May-05-1979
Reported in: AIR1980MP19
Malik, J. 1. The two First Appeals Nos. 213 of 1973 and 49 of 1972 are being disposed of by this common judgment.2. The facts may be briefly stated the Post Master General, Central Circle, Nagpur, wrote to the Collector, Raipur, on 9-11-1961 that land measuring 19500 square feet out of Nazul plots Nos. 2/11 and 2/24 was required for an Auto Exchange building and that steps be taker-for its acquisition. The usual notifies ions under section 4 read with Section 17(4) and section 6 of the Land Acquisition Act were issued on the 20th August, 1962 and 21st December, 1962 respectively. Thereafter, public notices were issued as contemplated by Section 9(1) of the Act on 7-11-1962 (sic) (1963?) and 29-1-1963 (See Ex. P-31 and Ex. P-30). Special notice came to be giver to Radhabai alone vide Ex. P-32 which was served on her through her husband Birdichand on 4-1-1963. Radhabai appeared before the Land Acquisition Officer and objected to acquisition of some portion of the land over which stood a ...
Tag this Judgment!Haru and ors. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: May-05-1979
Reported in: 1980CriLJ762; 1979MPLJ616
ORDERJ.P. Bajpai, J.1. The unusual and peculiar facts giving rise to this revision are that the Sub-Divisional Officer (Civil)', Pichhore. happened to seize the total stock of 101 quintals of wheat from the possession of the present applicants. The seizure was effected in exercise of the powers conferred on the SDO (C) by virtue of the provisions of the Madhya Pradesh Wheat Stock Requisitioning Order, 1973, made by the State Government by virtue of the powers under the Essential Commodities Act. The provisions of the control order referred above authorised the SDO(C) to requisition the stock of wheat which may be in excess of 20 quintals. At the time of seizure of the respective portions of the stock from their possession, each of the applicants made a clear statement before the SDO (C) that the said stock of wheat did not belong to them and actually belonged to one Baijnath who had kept the same in their house. It appears that in order to avoid the requisitioning and the consequences ...
Tag this Judgment!Ramsewak and ors. Vs. State of M.P.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: May-04-1979
Reported in: 1979CriLJ1485
Faizanuddin, JJ.1. This is a reference of the single Bench of this High Court which raises an important and indeed an interesting question relating to the powers of the High Court and the Court of Session to issue directions for grant of anticipatory bail to persons who have been released on bail during committal proceedings and have not yet been committed in custody to the Court of Session for trial, but who apprehend that they may at the time of committing the case to the Court of Session be remanded to custody by the committing Magistrate.2. In this reference we are not much concerned about the facts as they exist before the trial Court, but it would be appropriate to refer and state the essential part of the relevant facts in brief so as to appreciate the points at issue, properly and effectively.3. The factual aspect of this case which emerges out, giving rise to this reference is that one Keshev Ram Dubey lodged a report in the Police Station, Pawai against the four accused/appli...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- Next ›