Skip to content

Madhya Pradesh Court September 1977 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

  • AI Brief & Ask
  • Semantic AI Search
  • Devil's Bench

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Sep 21 1977

Ravishanker Vs. Smt. Sharda Vishwakarma

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Decided on: Sep-21-1977

Reported in: AIR1978MP44

J.S. Verma, J.1. This appeal is against the Judgment dated 5th July, 1977, passed by the Fourth Additional District Judge, Jabalpur, in Civil Suit No. 82-A of 1976. By that Judgment, the trial Court dismissed a joint application made by a married couple for grant of a divorce by mutual consent under Section 13B of the Hindu Marriage Act which has been inserted by the Marriage Laws (Amendment) Act, 1976 (No 68 of 1976). The trial Court has held that a divorce by mutual consent in accordance with the newly added Section 13B alone cannot be granted and it is necessary to prove the existence also of some other ground to enable grant of divorce. This has led to the present appeal also filed jointly by the couple.2. There is no controversy about thefacts.3. The facts pleaded and also (adequately proved by evidence adduced in the trial Court are these: The parties were married at Jabalpur on 19th June, 1975. They lived together only for 22 days thereafter and have, since then, been unable to ...


Sep 07 1977

Sohanlal G. Sanghi Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, M. P.

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Decided on: Sep-07-1977

Reported in: [1978]114ITR272(MP)

OZA J. - This is a reference made under section 66(2) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Bombay, in pursuance of an order passed by this court in Misc. Civil Case No. 286 of 1966, decided on September 23, 1968.The assessment year in question is 1958-59, the previous year being the financial year which ended on 31st March, 1958. The dispute pertains to the assessees income in the previous year from various sources including the business run in the name Rewa Transport Services, Rewa. From this head the assessee showed receipts at Rs. 3,23,053. The Income-tax Officer did not accept these receipts of the transport income shown in the assessees account books. He thought that the figure shown by the assessee as his earnings from the transport business against mileage of 3,86,878 was very low as compared to the receipts shown by the assessee himself in earlier years and the mileage covered by the assessee in those years. It was also observed that the rec...


  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial