Madhya Pradesh Court May 1974 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Smt. Vidya Devi and anr. Vs. Madhya Pradesh State Road Transport Corpo ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: May-02-1974
Reported in: AIR1975MP89; 1974MPLJ573
G.P. Singh, J. 1. This is an appeal under Section 110-D of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939. On 24th July, 1968 there was an accident in Jabalpur at the crossing of two roads which will be referred to as Katni road and Stadium road. Katni road goes from bus stand to Katni and Stadium road from Shahid Smarak to the Stadium. The vehicles involved in the accident were Bus No. M. P. K. 5033 owned by the Madhya Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation and a motor-cycle driven by Inderjeet Singh. The bus, which at the relevant time was driven by Corporation's driver Abdul Bashir, came from the bus-stand and was proceeding towards Katni. The motor-cycle came from Shahid Smarak side. It collided with the front portion of the bus on the right hand side. Inderjeet Singh sustained fracture of the skull in this accident and died soon thereafter in the hospital. The deceased's widow Vidya Devi and infant son Amarjeet Singh applied to the Claims Tribunal, Jabalpur, for award of compensation. The Tribuna...
Umraosingh and Co., Mahanagar, Lucknow (U.P.) Vs. the State of Madhya ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: May-01-1974
Reported in: AIR1976MP126
Singh, J.1. This judgment shall also dispose of Miscellaneous (First) Appeal No. 60 of 1965.2. The facts giving rise to these appeals are that on 14th April, 1952 contract for construction of a bridge on Narmada near Mortakka was granted by the Government to M/s. Umraosingh and Company, which is a partnership firm and Shall hereinafter be referred to as the contractors. The contract was for a lump sum payment of Rs. 23,49,000/-. According to Clause (13) of the Contract, the works were to be completed within 24 months. Extension of time was, however, contemplated on account of works being altered, varied or added to or on account of any delay by reason of inclement weather or causes beyond the control of the contractors. The contract contained an arbitration Clause which reads as follows:'17. Provided always that in case any question, dispute or difference shall arise between the E. E. and the contractors: as to what additions, if any, ought in fairness to be made to the amount of the c...
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›