Madhya Pradesh Court February 1972 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Radhika Prasad Vs. State of M.P., Bhopal and ors.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-08-1972
Reported in: AIR1972MP124; 1972MPLJ530
A.P. Sen, J. 1. This is a petition by Radhika Prasad directed against the orders of the Board of Revenue, Madhya Pradesh and the revenue authorities subordinate to it rejecting his claim to settlement of khasra No. 194, area 1.55 acres, situate in village Karela, under Section 5 (h) of the M.P. Abolition of Proprietary Rights Act, 1950.2. The relevant facts are these. During the Chakbandi proceedings of the year 1937, old khasra Nos. 1172/2 and 1195/2, area 1.55 acres which were then recorded as bagicha, were renumbered as khasra No. 194 and entered as khudkasht as presumably the land had been brought under cultivation. In the subsequent years, the land was apparently allowed to be fallow. So, in the annual papers for the years 1950-51 and onwards, the land was recorded as grass. It was, therefore, treated as having vested in the Stats under Section 4 of the Act.3. After a lapse of 16 years from the date of vesting, the petitioner on 13-2-1967. applied to the Sub-Divisional Officer und...
Suresh Chand Vs. Principal, Government Girls Degree College and anr.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-07-1972
Reported in: (1972)IILLJ363MP; 1972MPLJ481
ORDERBishambhar Dayal, C.J.1. This is a petition by Suresh Chand Choubey who was employed on a temporary post of a laboratory assistant in a Government Girls Degree College. His services were terminated at first by an order, dated 7th July, 1970 (Annexure P-2 to the petition). In this order it was mentioned that after search some facts had come to knowledge which indicated that the petitioner took out acid belonging to the college and threw it on a co-employee and that his conduct also was otherwise unsuitable for employment in a girls college. His services were, therefore, terminated. Subsequently, this order was withdrawn and another order (Annexure P-3) was served on the petitioner which merely stated that his services were no more required by the college and were, therefore, terminated with effect from 31st July, 1970. This order itself was dated 31st July, 1970.2. Learned Counsel appearing for the applicant has contended that the applicant's services were not temporary because in ...
Bajranglal and anr. Vs. Purushottamdas Puranlal Narele
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-02-1972
Reported in: AIR1972MP137; 1972MPLJ555
Singh, J.1. This is an appeal by the defendants in a suit for specific performance of a contract for reconveyance.2. The facts now no longer in dispute are that Purushottamdas owned a house (No. 443 old No. 88) in Miloniguni, Jabalpur. He sold this house for a sum of Rs. 10,000/- on December 2, 1963, to Bajranglal. An agreement for reconveyance of the house on payment of Rs. 10,000/- within two years was executed by Bajranglal in favour of Purushottamdas. The agreement bears the date December 3, 1963, but the finding of the trial Court, which has not been challenged before us, is that it was executed on December 2, 1963 and the sale and agreement constituted one transaction. Possession of the house was not delivered to Bajranglal and Purushottamdas continued to be in possession. He, however, executed a rent-note agreeing to pay rent at the rate of Rs. 120/-per month. Previously, the same house was mortgaged on December 7. 1960, in favour of Firm Fatehchand Shrinivas for a sum of Rs. 1,...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- Next ›