Madhya Pradesh Court October 1972 Judgments
The State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Padam Singh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-31-1972
Reported in: 1973CriLJ877; 1973MPLJ129
S.M.N. Raina, J.1. This is an appeal by the State Government against an order of acquittal.2. The respondent Padamsingh (hereinafter referred to as 'the accused') was tried on a charge under Section 419 of the Indian Penal Code by the Additional District Magistrate, Gwalior. After trial he was acquitted. This appeal is directed against the said order of acquittal.3. The case of the prosecution is that on 12th December, 1966 when the Company Commandant. Home Guards was recruiting some Home Guard Sainiks the accused submitted an application for the said post evince out his name as Ramsingh son of Hiralal. The accused was recruited as Home Guard Sainik and received uniform and other emoluments admissible to a Home Guard Sainik. After the lapse of a few months it was discovered that the name of the accused was Padamsingh and he had got himself recruited as a Home Guard Sainik by giving a false name. He was. therefore, prosecuted for an offence under Section 419 of the Indian Penal Code. He...
Tag this Judgment!Sidha Ahir Vs. DevidIn and ors.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-25-1972
Reported in: AIR1973MP161; 1973MPLJ429
Tare, C.J. 1. This order shall also govern the disposal of Miscellaneous Petition No. 80 of 1970 (Deonath v. Devidin and Ors). In these Writ Petitions the two petitioners challenge the order, dated 19-7-1969, passed by the learned Member of the Board of Revenue, Gwalior, allowing the revision of the first respondent and dismissing the petitioner's application for allotment of land under Section 162 of the M. P. Land Revenue Code, 1959, which was deleted from the statute book with effect from 23-4-1964, vide Amendment Act No. 25 of 1964. 2-3. The petitioner, Sidha applied for allotment of Khasra Nos. 305, 409, 436 and 600, while the petitioner, Deonath applied for allotment of Khasra Nos. 168, 169, 174, 175 and 465 under Section 162 of the M. P. Land Revenue Code, 1959. The first respondent, Devidin, who was a former Pavaidar, claimed that land to be his on the basis that it was his Sir land and asserted that he had been in possession. An application to the Tahsildar was made on behalf ...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- Next ›