Madhya Pradesh Court January 1972 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Rajaram (Dead) and ors. Vs. Ganpatlal Vaishya and anr.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-10-1972
Reported in: AIR1973MP268; 1973MPLJ510
Shiv Dayal, J. 1. This second appeal arises from a suit for ejectment and arrears of rent inter alia on the grounds that the tenant did not pay or tender arrears of rent within one month of the receipt of notice of damand within the meaning of Section 4 (a) of the M. P. Accommodation Control Act, 1955 (hereinafter called the Act), which was then in force and which governs the suit, and also on the ground that the landlord genuinely requires the accommodation for his own business and residence within the meaning of Section 4 (1) (g) of the Act.2. The suit was resisted by the appellants contending that they had been sending money orders one after another to the plaintiff, who went on refusing them. They sent a money order after receipt of notice also. That too came back from the post office with the endorsement of refusal as before. They further contended that the plaintiff did not genuinely require the suit accommodation for his business or residence.3. The trial Court dismissed the sui...
Mahila Krishna Kumari Vs. Mahila Sakun Bhatnagar and ors.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-05-1972
Reported in: AIR1972MP155
S.M.N. Raina, J.1. This is a revision petition under Section 26 of the M. P. Municipalities Act, 1961, (hereinafter referred to as the Act).2. After the election of the elected Councillors of the Municipal Council, Morena, in 1968, a meeting was held for the selection of the selected Councillors. At the said meeting, there were two candidates, namely, Manila Krishna Kumari and Mahila Sakun Bhatnagar for the seat to be filled by a woman candidate. Mahila Krishna Kumari (petitioner before this Court) was selected. Her selection was, however, challenged by an election petition filed by Rajaram (non-applicant No. 2) before the District Judge, Morena. The contention of Rajaram was that the nomination paper of Mahila Krishna Kumari was wrongly accepted as she failed to express her willingness in writing to serve as a Councillor, to the Chairman of the meeting as required by Rule 49 of the M. P. Municipalities (Preparation, Revision and Publication of Electoral Rolls. Election and Selection o...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- Next ›