Madhya Pradesh Court September 1971 Judgments
Ramsingh Vs. Shankarlal
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-24-1971
Reported in: AIR1974MP90
S.R. Vyas, J. 1. The following question has been referred to this Bench for opinion (by a Division Bench):-- 'whether Ikramuddin v. Gulabkhan, (1966 Revenue Nirnaya 1) was correctly decided when it held that a holding means a plot held by a Bhumiswami separatelyassessed to land revenue ?' 2. Briefly stated the facts giving rise to the present reference are these:--Respondent Shankarlal held a decree for money against the appellant Ramsingh. In execution of this decree, he attached certain agricultural lands held by Ramsingh in Bhumiswami rights under three different survey Nos. respectively measuring 17.19,6.63 and 11.89 acres. These lands were sold one by one by public auction and, with the leave wanted by (the Executing Court, the decree-holder purchased all the lands, 3. The judgment-debtor, after the sales were confirmed, challenged the sales on grounds with which we are presently not concerned. After these objections were disallowed he, for the first time in an appeal (Misc. Appea...
Tag this Judgment!Madhya Pradesh Electricity Board, Jabalpur Vs. the Central India Elect ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-14-1971
Reported in: AIR1972MP47; 1972MPLJ199
A.P. Sen, J.1. This order will dispose of Misc. (First) Appeal No. 34 of 1970 (The Central India Electric Supply Co., Ltd. v. Madhya Pradesh Electricity Board).These are appeals under Section 39(1)(iii) of the Arbitration Act, 1940, directed against an order of the District Judge, Jabal-pur, making an award the rule of the Court subject to a variation in the date from which the interest is to run.2. The Central India Electric Supply Co. Ltd., held a licence for the supply or electric energy for the Bilaspur region w. e. f. 1st May, 1934. On the expiry of the licence, the Madhya Pradesh Electricity Board purchased the undertaking under Section 6 of the Electricity Act, 1910. There was a dispute between the parties as regards the purchase price and, therefore, the dispute was referred to arbitration under Section 7A(1) of the Act.3. Shri B. P. Sinha, former Chief Justice of India, was the Umpire in the arbitration under Section 7A(1) of the Indian Electricity Act, 1910.4. By an award dat...
Tag this Judgment!Ramdhani Pande Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-02-1971
Reported in: 1973CriLJ1880
T.P. Naik, J.1. This accused-appellant Ramdhani Pandey has been convicted by the Third Additional Sessions Judge. Jabalpur, under Section 330 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for a period of three years together with a fine of Rs. 100/- or, in default of payment of the fine, further rigorous imprisonment for a period of one month. He has also been convicted in the same trial under Section 348 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for a period of one year together with a fine of Rs. 100/- or, in default of the payment of the fine, further rigorous imprisonment for a period of one month. The substantive terms of imprisonment have been ordered to runconcurrently.2. The prosecution case, in short, is as follows. The accused-appellant, who was a Sub-Inspector of Police, was posted as Station Officer, Police Station, Shahnagar, district Panna. in November and December 1966. A corpse was found near & place called 'Dana Baba Ki Bhatia' i...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- Next ›