Madhya Pradesh Court August 1965 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ganesh Prasad Dixit Vs. Commissioner of Sales Tax
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-31-1965
Reported in: 1966(17)ELT14(MP); 1965MPLJ971
ORDERP.V. Dixit, C.J.1. This is a reference under Section 44 of the Madhya Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1958, at the instance of the assessee Ganesh Prasad Dixit of Marhatal, Jabalpur. The questions which we have been asked to answer by the Sales Tax Tribunal are :-(1) Whether, in the facts and circumstances of the case, the notice in Form XVI that was served on the applicant was invalid and, therefore, the assessment of the applicant on the basis of that notice was bad in law ?(2) Whether, in the facts and circumstances of the case, the applicant was a dealer during the assessment period under the Act and the imposition of purchase tax on him under Section 7 of the Act was in order ?2. The material facts are that the assessee is a building contractor and registered as a dealer under the Madhya Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1958. In the course of his business he is required to purchase certain goods and materials for the execution of contract works undertaken by him. As he failed to...
Premchand JaIn Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and ors.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-27-1965
Reported in: AIR1966MP117
Pandey, J. 1. This petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution is mainly directed against-(i) an order dated 2nd February 1965 whereby R. S. Shukla, Special Secretary to the State Government in the Home Department, approved under Section 68D (2) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 (hereinafter called the Act), Schemes Nos. 2, 4, 5, 7 and 9 with certain modifications, all these Schemes having been prepared and published earlier under Section 68C of the Act; (ii) the subsequent publication of Scheme No. 2 in the Official Gazette dated 12th February 1965 as required by Section 68D (3) of the Act; and (iii) a notice dated 26th February 1965 Issued under Section 68F (2) of the Act by which certain permits held by the petitioner for some routes covered by Scheme No. 2 were cancelled. 2. In Miscellaneous Petition No. 126 of 1965, some other existing operators have claimed similar reliefs in regard to the same Scheme No. 2. For like reliefs, similar Miscellaneous Petitions, Nos. 129 ...
State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Naraindatta S/O Babulal
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-27-1965
Reported in: AIR1966MP158; 1966CriLJ663; 1965MPLJ964
Shiv Dayal, J. 1. This is an application for revision for enhancement of sentence awarded by the Additional Sessions Judge, Satna, in Sessions Trial No. 8 of 1963. The revision petition was filed on 11th January 1965 in rather peculiar circumstances, while the judgment of the Sessions Court is dated 7 December 1963. The applicant-State has also made an application for condonation of delay.2. The non-applicant and three others were committed to the Court of Session under Section 394/397, Penal Code, for having allegedly committed robbery. So far as the non-applicant is concerned, the Additional Sessions Judge found him guilty and convicted him under Section 394, read with Section 397, Penal Code, (as he used a deadly weapon), and sentenced him to suffer rigorous imprisonment for four years. Two of the other three accused were convicted under Section 394, Penal Code, and sentenced to two years rigorous imprisonment; the third was acquitted.3. Naraindatta (non-applicant) and the other two...
Municipal Council Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and ors.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-26-1965
Reported in: AIR1967MP136
Dixit, C.J. 1. By this application under Article 226 of the Constitution the Municipal Council, Piparia, seeks a writ of certiorari for quashing a notification issued on 16th May, 1951 under Section 6 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, (hereinafter referred to as the Act), for the acquisition of some land belonging to the respondent No. 3 for the benefit of the petitioner-Council and also for quashing an award dated 20th July 1963 of the Land Acquisition Officer, Hoshangabad, giving to the said respondent a total compensation of Rs. 40,250. The petitioner also prays that the order made by the Land Acquisition Officer on 20th July 1964 rejecting its application under Section 18 of the Act for reference he also quashed and that the Land Acquisition Officer be commanded to make a reference to the Court of the District Judge, Hoshangabad.2. Having heard learned counsel for the parties we have reached the conclusion that this application must be dismissed. The petitioner-Council is anxious ...
Gaya Prasad Vs. Mst. Bhagwati
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-26-1965
Reported in: AIR1966MP212
Bhargava. J.1. The appellant Gaya Prasad filed a petition for restitution of conjugal rights in the Court of the District Judge, Hoshangabad, which was dismissed by him. He has, therefore, filed this appeal.2. It is not disputed that the marriage between the parties took place in the year 1959. After the marriage, the respondent-wife Suit. Bhagwati lived with the appellant (petitioner) on two occasions; for the first time, she lived with him immediately after the marriage and then for the second time, after about six months of the marriage. The couple lived in the house of the petitioner at Bankhedi in the Sohagpur tehsil of Hoshangabad district. The petitioner averred in the petition that in June 1962, his father went to Pachmarhi where the respondent was residing with her parents to fetch her but she was not sent on one pretext or another. He urged that later he himself went to fetch her in the month of July 1962 but she refused to go and thus withdrew herself from the society of the...
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›