Madhya Pradesh Court January 1963 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Seth Fida HussaIn Vs. Fazal HussaIn and ors.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-09-1963
Reported in: AIR1963MP232; 1963MPLJ243
Dixit, C.J.1. This civil revision has come up before us for dispose on a reference by Shiv Dayal J. before whom a first came up for hearing.2. The material facts are that the opponents Nos. 1 to 4 instituted a suit in the Court of the Civil Judge, Class 1, Khandwa, against the petitioner Fida Hussain and the opponents Nos. 5 and 6 Gehimal and Totaram for possession of a plot described in Schedule A attached to the plaint. It was alleged by the plaintiffs that they were the owners of the plot, and that on or about 5th March 1957 Gehimal and Tolaram wrongfully and forcibly took possession of the plot; and that when they were asked to restore the possession of the land, they refused to do so according that they had taken it on rent from the petitioner Fida Hussain.3. Gehimal and Tolaram contested the suit by pleading that Fida Hussain was the owner of the land and that no had let out the property to them. The petitioner also cent-ed the plaintiffs' title. He, however, added that he has le...
Deviden Chenaji Vs. Mankibai Devideen
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-08-1963
Reported in: 1966CriLJ1089
ORDERS.B. Sen, J.1. For disposing of this reference it is necessary to give out the facts which are not disputed.2. An application was made by Nankibai w/o. Devidelen under Section 488, Criminal P.C. An order for maintenance was passed some time in 1953 (31.7.53) for payment of Rs. 14 per month to her. On the basis of this order payments were made by the husband for some months but he soon made some defaults. So an application was made by Nankibai on 26.7.59 for recovery of arrears due then. This application was resisted by the husband on various grounds including his offer to maintain his wife on condition of her living with him and also his inability to pay the maintenance amount. The matter dragged on for a long time and ultimately this application was decided against the husband on 25.2.59. In the said order recovery for the seven months which was due on the date of the application was passed. A fresh application was moved on 11.6.59 but the same was dismissed for default on 21.7.5...
Commissioner of Sales Tax Vs. Ram Dulare Balkishan and Bros.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-02-1963
Reported in: 1963MPLJ256; [1963]14STC202(MP)
ORDER1. In this reference under Section 44 of the Madhya Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1958, read with Section 23(1) of the Central Provinces and Berar Sales Tax Act, 1947, the question which we have been asked to answer is-Whether under the facts and circumstances of the case, the nonapplicant can be regarded as a dealer under Section 2(c) of the C.P. and Berar Sales Tax Act, 1947, in respect of the sales of used up motor vehicles and used up parts like tyres and tubes ?2. Ramdulare Balkishan and Brothers of Balaghat are bus operators and carry on the business of providing transport. They own several buses and trucks. During the period from 1st January, 1957, to 31st March, 1959, the assessee sold unserviceable cars, trucks, tyres, and other used motor accessories to various persons. The value of all these sales amounted to Rs. 6,154-12-0. The Assistant Sales Tax Officer, Chhindwara, held that the assessee was a 'dealer' as defined in Section 2(c) of the Act of 1947 and accordingly a...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- Next ›