Madhya Pradesh Court February 1959 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
K.C. Sharma S/O Tarachand Vs. Krishi Pandit Rishab Kumar and ors.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-02-1959
Reported in: AIR1960MP27
Pandey, J.1. This is an appeal under Section 116A of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 (hereinafter called the Act against the order of the Election Tribunal, Chhatarpur, dated 16-7-1958 by which the appellant's election petition under Section 81 of the Act calling in question the election of the respondents 1; and 2 from the Khurai Rural Constituency to the Slate Legislative Assembly was dismissed.2. The constituency in this case is a double- member constituency, one of the seats being reserved for a member of the Scheduled Castes. The polling took place on 9-3-1957 and the respondents 1 and 2, who secured the largest number of votes, were declared elected to the general and the reserved seat respectively. On 25-4-1957, the appellant, who contested the election for the general seat, filed his election petition alleging that the respondent 1, and others acting for the respondents 1 and 2, had committed a number of corrupt practices detailed in schedules A and B and that the re...
Firm Kanhaiyalal Vs. Dineshchandra
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-02-1959
Reported in: AIR1959MP234
ORDERP.V. Dixit, J. 1. The question raised in this revision petition is as to the jurisdiction of the Court of the Civil Judge, First Class, Ratlam, to try a suit instituted by the opponent for damages for breach of a contract to sell and deliver five wagons of Makka. 2. In his suit, the plaintiff has alleged that on 23-3-1955 the petitioner firm doing business at Ramganj Mandi, Rajasthan, made an offer to him on phone for the sale of five wagons of Makka at a certain rate; that the goods were to be delivered at Asarwa; and that subsequently the defendant failed to deliver the .stipulated Makka to the plaintiff-firm. On these allegations the plaintiff averred that the defendant had committed a breach of the contract and claimed damages to the extent of Es. 6,845-0-6. The plaintiff further pleaded that the contract was concluded in Ratlam and the payment in respect of the goods was also to be made in Ratlam and, therefore, the Ratlam Court had jurisdiction to try the suit. The defendant...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- Next ›