Madhya Pradesh Court January 1957 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Union of India (Uoi) Vs. Manikchand
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-04-1957
Reported in: AIR1957MP215
Dixit, J.1. This is an appeal by the State under Section 417, Cr. P. C. from an order of the Additional District and Railway Magistrate, Indore City, acquitting the respondent Manikchand under Section 247, Cr. P. C.2. The facts are that on 23rd March, 1955, Shri Ramchandra, an Inspector appointed under Section 19 of the Minimum Wages Act, 1948, filed a complaint against Manikchand under Section 22(2) of the Act. When the case was called on for hearing shortly after 2 P. M. on 12th December, 1955, which was the date fixed for recording the prosecution evidence, the complainant and his counsel were not present in the Court. The accused and his counsel were, however, present. Thereupon the learned Magistrate gave an oral direction that the complaint would be dismissed and the accused would be acquitted.Soon after this direction was given the complainant and his counsel appeared in the Court and presented an application stating that the case was to come up for hearing at 2 P.M. at that tim...
Tejmal Vs. the Collector
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-03-1957
Reported in: AIR1958MP11
Samvatsar, J.1. This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.2. The petitioner's case briefly stated is as follows:--That the petitioner has installed a flour mill in the Bada of one Kesrimal Shivlal situated in Neem Chowk, Mandsaur, in the year 1951, The said flour mill is being run by the petitioner with the help of an oil engine and under the terms of a licence issued by the local Municipal Committee,That in the year 1953 certain complaints were received by the Municipality from the inhabitants of the locality that the working of the flour mill was causing a nuisance to them and was further causing damage to the property in the neighbourhood. These complaints were examined by the then Municipal Authorities and on 7-3-1953 they held that these complaints were inspired by reason of the hostility of the neighbours towards the petitioner and the allegations made therein were not proved.The licence under which the flour mill was run by the petitioner was initially gr...
Harisingh Vijaysingh Vs. Fatehsingh Narayan
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-02-1957
Reported in: AIR1957MP46
ORDERNevaskar, J.1. Plaintiff' Fatehsingh sued defendant Harisingh for the recovery of Rs. 388-10-0. The suit related to the arrears of salary which the plaintiff was entitled to claim from the defendant. These arrears were said to be at the rate of Rs. 150 per month and were in respect of a period of three months. According to the plaintiff Rs. 61-12-0 were received by him towards this amount of Rs. 450-6-0 and the balance of Rs. 388-10-0 is claimed in the suit.2. The defendant denied plaintiff's claim. He denied that he had ever employed the plaintiff as a driver. He owned no truck. According to the defendant the plaintiff was working with one Bharatsingh who has absconded and the plaintiff being unable to recover his money has brought a false suit against him.Before the plaintiff was employed by Bharatsingh he was, according to the defendant, without any work. He requested the defendant to find an employment for him and he had pointed out the name of Eharatsingh to him. For such a s...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- Next ›